mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
To: corey@minyard.net
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ipmi: Fix the race between __scan_channels() and deliver_response()
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 15:42:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930074239.2353-2-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930074239.2353-1-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>

The race window between __scan_channels() and deliver_response() causes
the parameters of some channels to be set to 0.

1.[CPUA] __scan_channels() issues an IPMI request and waits with
         wait_event() until all channels have been scanned.
         wait_event() internally calls might_sleep(), which might
         yield the CPU. (Moreover, an interrupt can preempt
         wait_event() and force the task to yield the CPU.)
2.[CPUB] deliver_response() is invoked when the CPU receives the
         IPMI response. After processing a IPMI response,
         deliver_response() directly assigns intf->wchannels to
         intf->channel_list and sets intf->channels_ready to true.
         However, not all channels are actually ready for use.
3.[CPUA] Since intf->channels_ready is already true, wait_event()
         never enters __wait_event(). __scan_channels() immediately
         clears intf->null_user_handler and exits.
4.[CPUB] Once intf->null_user_handler is set to NULL, deliver_response()
         ignores further IPMI responses, leaving the remaining
	 channels zero-initialized and unusable.

CPUA                             CPUB
-------------------------------  -----------------------------
__scan_channels()
 intf->null_user_handler
       = channel_handler;
 send_channel_info_cmd(intf,
       0);
 wait_event(intf->waitq,
       intf->channels_ready);
  do {
   might_sleep();
                                 deliver_response()
                                  channel_handler()
                                   intf->channel_list =
				         intf->wchannels + set;
                                   intf->channels_ready = true;
                                   send_channel_info_cmd(intf,
                                         intf->curr_channel);
   if (condition)
    break;
   __wait_event(wq_head,
          condition);
  } while(0)
 intf->null_user_handler
       = NULL;
                                 deliver_response()
                                  if (!msg->user)
                                   if (intf->null_user_handler)
                                    rv = -EINVAL;
                                  return rv;
-------------------------------  -----------------------------

Fix the race between __scan_channels() and deliver_response() by
deferring both the assignment intf->channel_list = intf->wchannels
and the flag intf->channels_ready = true until all channels have
been successfully scanned or until the IPMI request has failed.

Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 8e9050f99e9e..a6e2e8246ab1 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -3406,8 +3406,6 @@ channel_handler(struct ipmi_smi *intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg)
 			intf->channels_ready = true;
 			wake_up(&intf->waitq);
 		} else {
-			intf->channel_list = intf->wchannels + set;
-			intf->channels_ready = true;
 			rv = send_channel_info_cmd(intf, intf->curr_channel);
 		}
 
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-30  7:42 [PATCH v2 0/3] ipmi: Close " Jinhui Guo
2025-09-30  7:42 ` Jinhui Guo [this message]
2025-09-30  7:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ipmi: Fix __scan_channels() failing to rescan channels Jinhui Guo
2025-09-30  7:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ipmi: Skip channel scan if channels are already marked ready Jinhui Guo
2025-10-03 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ipmi: Close the race between __scan_channels() and deliver_response() Corey Minyard
2025-12-05  8:01   ` Jinhui Guo
2025-12-05 13:05     ` Corey Minyard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250930074239.2353-2-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com \
    --to=guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com \
    --cc=corey@minyard.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®