* [PATCH v1] perf parse-events: Make X modifier more respectful of groups
@ 2025-10-17 16:57 Ian Rogers
2025-10-17 17:54 ` Falcon, Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-10-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers,
Adrian Hunter, Thomas Falcon, Dapeng Mi, linux-perf-users,
linux-kernel
Events with an X modifier were reordered within a group, for example
slots was made the leader in:
```
$ perf record -e '{cpu/mem-stores/ppu,cpu/slots/uX}' -- sleep 1
```
Fix by making `dont_regroup` evsels always use their index for
sorting. Make the cur_leader, when fixing the groups, be that of
`dont_regroup` evsel so that the `dont_regroup` evsel doesn't become a
leader.
On a tigerlake this patch corrects this and meets expectations in:
```
$ perf stat -e '{cpu/mem-stores/,cpu/slots/uX}' -a -- sleep 0.1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
83,458,652 cpu/mem-stores/
2,720,854,880 cpu/slots/uX
0.103780587 seconds time elapsed
$ perf stat -e 'slots,slots:X' -a -- sleep 0.1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
732,042,247 slots (48.96%)
643,288,155 slots:X (51.04%)
0.102731018 seconds time elapsed
```
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/18f20d38-070c-4e17-bc90-cf7102e1e53d@linux.intel.com/
Fixes: 035c17893082 ("perf parse-events: Add 'X' modifier to exclude an event from being regrouped")
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 3aec86aebdc6..1a5da93f4094 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1973,14 +1973,18 @@ static int evlist__cmp(void *_fg_idx, const struct list_head *l, const struct li
* event's index is used. An index may be forced for events that
* must be in the same group, namely Intel topdown events.
*/
- if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) {
+ if (lhs->dont_regroup) {
+ lhs_sort_idx = lhs_core->idx;
+ } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) {
lhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx;
} else {
bool lhs_has_group = lhs_core->leader != lhs_core || lhs_core->nr_members > 1;
lhs_sort_idx = lhs_has_group ? lhs_core->leader->idx : lhs_core->idx;
}
- if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) {
+ if (rhs->dont_regroup) {
+ rhs_sort_idx = rhs_core->idx;
+ } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) {
rhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx;
} else {
bool rhs_has_group = rhs_core->leader != rhs_core || rhs_core->nr_members > 1;
@@ -2078,10 +2082,10 @@ static int parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list)
*/
idx = 0;
list_for_each_entry(pos, list, core.node) {
- const struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos);
+ struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos);
const char *pos_pmu_name = pos->group_pmu_name;
const char *cur_leader_pmu_name;
- bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 &&
+ bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 && !pos->dont_regroup &&
arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(pos);
/* Reset index and nr_members. */
@@ -2095,8 +2099,8 @@ static int parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list)
* groups can't span PMUs.
*/
if (!cur_leader || pos->dont_regroup) {
- cur_leader = pos;
- cur_leaders_grp = &pos->core;
+ cur_leader = pos_leader;
+ cur_leaders_grp = &cur_leader->core;
if (pos_force_grouped)
force_grouped_leader = pos;
}
--
2.51.0.858.gf9c4a03a3a-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] perf parse-events: Make X modifier more respectful of groups 2025-10-17 16:57 [PATCH v1] perf parse-events: Make X modifier more respectful of groups Ian Rogers @ 2025-10-17 17:54 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-10-17 21:53 ` Ian Rogers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-10-17 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: alexander.shishkin, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, peterz, acme, mingo, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung, jolsa, dapeng1.mi, irogers On Fri, 2025-10-17 at 09:57 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > Events with an X modifier were reordered within a group, for example > slots was made the leader in: > ``` > $ perf record -e '{cpu/mem-stores/ppu,cpu/slots/uX}' -- sleep 1 > ``` > > Fix by making `dont_regroup` evsels always use their index for > sorting. Make the cur_leader, when fixing the groups, be that of > `dont_regroup` evsel so that the `dont_regroup` evsel doesn't become > a > leader. > > On a tigerlake this patch corrects this and meets expectations in: > ``` > $ perf stat -e '{cpu/mem-stores/,cpu/slots/uX}' -a -- sleep 0.1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 83,458,652 cpu/mem-stores/ > 2,720,854,880 cpu/slots/uX > > 0.103780587 seconds time elapsed > > $ perf stat -e 'slots,slots:X' -a -- sleep 0.1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 732,042,247 slots (48.96%) > 643,288,155 slots:X (51.04%) > > 0.102731018 seconds time elapsed > ``` > Hi Ian, just confirming the results on an Alder Lake: % sudo ./perf stat -e '{cpu_core/mem-stores/,cpu_core/slots/uX}' -a -- sleep 0.1 Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 23,097,346 cpu_core/mem-stores/ 666,910,974 cpu_core/slots/uX 0.101369982 seconds time elapsed % sudo ./perf stat -e 'slots,slots:X' -a -- sleep 0.1 Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 1,775,555,180 cpu_core/slots/ (50.08%) 1,910,073,872 cpu_core/slots/X (49.92%) 0.101368283 seconds time elapsed Tested-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> Thanks, Tom > Closes: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/18f20d38-070c-4e17-bc90-cf7102e1e53d@linux.intel.com/ > Fixes: 035c17893082 ("perf parse-events: Add 'X' modifier to exclude > an event from being regrouped") > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > --- > tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse- > events.c > index 3aec86aebdc6..1a5da93f4094 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > @@ -1973,14 +1973,18 @@ static int evlist__cmp(void *_fg_idx, const > struct list_head *l, const struct li > * event's index is used. An index may be forced for events > that > * must be in the same group, namely Intel topdown events. > */ > - if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) { > + if (lhs->dont_regroup) { > + lhs_sort_idx = lhs_core->idx; > + } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) { > lhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx; > } else { > bool lhs_has_group = lhs_core->leader != lhs_core || > lhs_core->nr_members > 1; > > lhs_sort_idx = lhs_has_group ? lhs_core->leader->idx > : lhs_core->idx; > } > - if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) { > + if (rhs->dont_regroup) { > + rhs_sort_idx = rhs_core->idx; > + } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) { > rhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx; > } else { > bool rhs_has_group = rhs_core->leader != rhs_core || > rhs_core->nr_members > 1; > @@ -2078,10 +2082,10 @@ static int > parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list) > */ > idx = 0; > list_for_each_entry(pos, list, core.node) { > - const struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos); > + struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos); > const char *pos_pmu_name = pos->group_pmu_name; > const char *cur_leader_pmu_name; > - bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 && > + bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 && > !pos->dont_regroup && > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(pos); > > /* Reset index and nr_members. */ > @@ -2095,8 +2099,8 @@ static int > parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list) > * groups can't span PMUs. > */ > if (!cur_leader || pos->dont_regroup) { > - cur_leader = pos; > - cur_leaders_grp = &pos->core; > + cur_leader = pos_leader; > + cur_leaders_grp = &cur_leader->core; > if (pos_force_grouped) > force_grouped_leader = pos; > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf parse-events: Make X modifier more respectful of groups 2025-10-17 17:54 ` Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-10-17 21:53 ` Ian Rogers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-10-17 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Falcon, Thomas Cc: alexander.shishkin, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, peterz, acme, mingo, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung, jolsa, dapeng1.mi On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:55 AM Falcon, Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2025-10-17 at 09:57 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > Events with an X modifier were reordered within a group, for example > > slots was made the leader in: > > ``` > > $ perf record -e '{cpu/mem-stores/ppu,cpu/slots/uX}' -- sleep 1 > > ``` > > > > Fix by making `dont_regroup` evsels always use their index for > > sorting. Make the cur_leader, when fixing the groups, be that of > > `dont_regroup` evsel so that the `dont_regroup` evsel doesn't become > > a > > leader. > > > > On a tigerlake this patch corrects this and meets expectations in: > > ``` > > $ perf stat -e '{cpu/mem-stores/,cpu/slots/uX}' -a -- sleep 0.1 > > > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > > > 83,458,652 cpu/mem-stores/ > > 2,720,854,880 cpu/slots/uX > > > > 0.103780587 seconds time elapsed > > > > $ perf stat -e 'slots,slots:X' -a -- sleep 0.1 > > > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > > > 732,042,247 slots (48.96%) > > 643,288,155 slots:X (51.04%) > > > > 0.102731018 seconds time elapsed > > ``` > > > > Hi Ian, just confirming the results on an Alder Lake: > > % sudo ./perf stat -e '{cpu_core/mem-stores/,cpu_core/slots/uX}' -a -- > sleep 0.1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 23,097,346 cpu_core/mem-stores/ > 666,910,974 cpu_core/slots/uX > > 0.101369982 seconds time elapsed > > % sudo ./perf stat -e 'slots,slots:X' -a -- sleep 0.1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 1,775,555,180 cpu_core/slots/ > (50.08%) > 1,910,073,872 cpu_core/slots/X > (49.92%) > > 0.101368283 seconds time elapsed > > Tested-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> I found an issue when the slots event is injected and will look at it in v2: ``` $ perf stat -v -e 'topdown-retiring' -a -- sleep 0.1 Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-8D-1 topdown-retiring -> cpu/topdown-retiring/ WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs evlist after sorting/fixing: '{slots,topdown-retiring}' Control descriptor is not initialized perf: util/evsel.c:2028: get_group_fd: Assertion `!(!leader->core.fd)' failed. Aborted ``` Thanks, Ian > Thanks, > Tom > > > Closes: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/18f20d38-070c-4e17-bc90-cf7102e1e53d@linux.intel.com/ > > Fixes: 035c17893082 ("perf parse-events: Add 'X' modifier to exclude > > an event from being regrouped") > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > --- > > tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse- > > events.c > > index 3aec86aebdc6..1a5da93f4094 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c > > @@ -1973,14 +1973,18 @@ static int evlist__cmp(void *_fg_idx, const > > struct list_head *l, const struct li > > * event's index is used. An index may be forced for events > > that > > * must be in the same group, namely Intel topdown events. > > */ > > - if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) { > > + if (lhs->dont_regroup) { > > + lhs_sort_idx = lhs_core->idx; > > + } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs)) { > > lhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx; > > } else { > > bool lhs_has_group = lhs_core->leader != lhs_core || > > lhs_core->nr_members > 1; > > > > lhs_sort_idx = lhs_has_group ? lhs_core->leader->idx > > : lhs_core->idx; > > } > > - if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) { > > + if (rhs->dont_regroup) { > > + rhs_sort_idx = rhs_core->idx; > > + } else if (*force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs)) { > > rhs_sort_idx = *force_grouped_idx; > > } else { > > bool rhs_has_group = rhs_core->leader != rhs_core || > > rhs_core->nr_members > 1; > > @@ -2078,10 +2082,10 @@ static int > > parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list) > > */ > > idx = 0; > > list_for_each_entry(pos, list, core.node) { > > - const struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos); > > + struct evsel *pos_leader = evsel__leader(pos); > > const char *pos_pmu_name = pos->group_pmu_name; > > const char *cur_leader_pmu_name; > > - bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > + bool pos_force_grouped = force_grouped_idx != -1 && > > !pos->dont_regroup && > > arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(pos); > > > > /* Reset index and nr_members. */ > > @@ -2095,8 +2099,8 @@ static int > > parse_events__sort_events_and_fix_groups(struct list_head *list) > > * groups can't span PMUs. > > */ > > if (!cur_leader || pos->dont_regroup) { > > - cur_leader = pos; > > - cur_leaders_grp = &pos->core; > > + cur_leader = pos_leader; > > + cur_leaders_grp = &cur_leader->core; > > if (pos_force_grouped) > > force_grouped_leader = pos; > > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-17 21:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-10-17 16:57 [PATCH v1] perf parse-events: Make X modifier more respectful of groups Ian Rogers 2025-10-17 17:54 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-10-17 21:53 ` Ian Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®