From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk_legacy_map: use LD_WAIT_CONFIG instead of LD_WAIT_SLEEP
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 21:14:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023191442.Uu0mD_Nq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023154657.GD26461@redhat.com>
On 2025-10-23 17:46:58 [+0200], Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Again, quite possibly I am wrong. please see my reply in another thread,
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251023152942.GC26461@redhat.com/
>
> On 10/23, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > This does not matter. My point is that there no need for this ifdefery.
>
> I disagree. Rightly or not. To me this ifdefery in printk.c make the intent
> more clear.
>
> I am still thinking about the possible cleanup of the current usage of
> DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(), but I think that, whatever we do, this cleanup
> should take CONFIG_RT into account.
Right. Please just do s/SLEEP/CONFIG as discussed. Please leave
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING out of it while arguing why this change is
correct.
> Oleg.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 15:41 [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 7:49 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-23 8:58 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 10:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 9:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-23 15:06 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 15:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-23 15:46 ` John Ogness
2025-10-23 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-23 19:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-10-24 9:35 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-24 10:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-24 12:57 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-24 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-24 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-24 10:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-24 11:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-10-27 8:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-10-27 8:37 ` John Ogness
2025-10-29 13:15 ` Petr Mladek
2025-10-29 17:00 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251023191442.Uu0mD_Nq@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®