mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] driver core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:19:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024101904.146351-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024101904.146351-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.

This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.

This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue()
to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.

With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.

Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 3c533dab8fa5..4dd264207a82 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -4138,7 +4138,7 @@ int __init devices_init(void)
 	sysfs_dev_char_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("char", dev_kobj);
 	if (!sysfs_dev_char_kobj)
 		goto char_kobj_err;
-	device_link_wq = alloc_workqueue("device_link_wq", 0, 0);
+	device_link_wq = alloc_workqueue("device_link_wq", WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	if (!device_link_wq)
 		goto wq_err;
 
-- 
2.51.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-24 10:19 [PATCH 0/3] WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue(), old wqs replaced Marco Crivellari
2025-10-24 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] driver core: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-24 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] devcoredump: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-24 10:19 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251024101904.146351-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®