From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch V4 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus()
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 21:48:51 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251104075427.221776184@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104075053.700034556@linutronix.de>
Reevaluating num_possible_cpus() over and over does not make sense. That
becomes a constant after init as cpu_possible_mask is marked ro_after_init.
Cache the value during initialization and provide that for consumption.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
V4: Add comment why this is not marked __init ....
V2: New patch
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 10 ++++++++--
kernel/cpu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
#define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
extern atomic_t __num_online_cpus;
+extern unsigned int __num_possible_cpus;
extern cpumask_t cpus_booted_once_mask;
@@ -1152,13 +1153,13 @@ void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpum
#define __assign_cpu(cpu, mask, val) \
__assign_bit(cpumask_check(cpu), cpumask_bits(mask), (val))
-#define set_cpu_possible(cpu, possible) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_possible_mask, (possible))
#define set_cpu_enabled(cpu, enabled) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_enabled_mask, (enabled))
#define set_cpu_present(cpu, present) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_present_mask, (present))
#define set_cpu_active(cpu, active) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_active_mask, (active))
#define set_cpu_dying(cpu, dying) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_dying_mask, (dying))
void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
+void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
/**
* to_cpumask - convert a NR_CPUS bitmap to a struct cpumask *
@@ -1211,7 +1212,12 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int num_
{
return raw_atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus);
}
-#define num_possible_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
+
+static __always_inline unsigned int num_possible_cpus(void)
+{
+ return __num_possible_cpus;
+}
+
#define num_enabled_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_enabled_mask)
#define num_present_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask)
#define num_active_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask)
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -3108,6 +3108,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_dying_mask);
atomic_t __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
+unsigned int __num_possible_cpus __ro_after_init = NR_CPUS;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_possible_cpus);
+
void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
{
cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
@@ -3116,6 +3119,7 @@ void init_cpu_present(const struct cpuma
void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src)
{
cpumask_copy(&__cpu_possible_mask, src);
+ __num_possible_cpus = cpumask_weight(&__cpu_possible_mask);
}
void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
@@ -3139,6 +3143,21 @@ void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bo
}
}
+/*
+ * This should be marked __init, but there is a boatload of call sites
+ * which need to be fixed up to do so. Sigh...
+ */
+void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
+{
+ if (possible) {
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask))
+ __num_possible_cpus++;
+ } else {
+ if (cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask))
+ __num_possible_cpus--;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Activate the first processor.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-16 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 20:48 [patch V4 00/20] sched: Rewrite MM CID management Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 01/20] sched/mmcid: Revert the complex " Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 02/20] sched/mmcid: Use proper data structures Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 03/20] sched/mmcid: Cacheline align MM CID storage Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 04/20] sched: Fixup whitespace damage Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 05/20] sched/mmcid: Move scheduler code out of global header Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 16:17 ` Yury Norov
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 06/20] sched/mmcid: Prevent pointless work in mm_update_cpus_allowed() Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 07/20] cpumask: Introduce cpumask_weighted_or() Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 08/20] sched/mmcid: Use cpumask_weighted_or() Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-19 16:20 ` Yury Norov
2025-11-16 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-11-17 16:48 ` [patch V4 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus() Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-18 4:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 10/20] sched/mmcid: Convert mm CID mask to a bitmap Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 11/20] signal: Move MMCID exit out of sighand lock Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 12/20] sched/mmcid: Move initialization out of line Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:48 ` [patch V4 13/20] sched/mmcid: Provide precomputed maximal value Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 16:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 14/20] sched/mmcid: Serialize sched_mm_cid_fork()/exit() with a mutex Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 15/20] sched/mmcid: Introduce per task/CPU ownership infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 19:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 16/20] sched/mmcid: Provide new scheduler CID mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 19:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 17/20] sched/mmcid: Provide CID ownership mode fixup functions Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 19:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 18/20] irqwork: Move data struct to a types header Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 19/20] sched/mmcid: Implement deferred mode change Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 20:49 ` [patch V4 20/20] sched/mmcid: Switch over to the new mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-17 19:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251104075427.221776184@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mjeanson@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®