Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 05:08:19PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use

Please write out "wq" - the commit message should be for humans and not
contain variables or entities from the code.

> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to

s/cpu/CPU/

> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> 
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
> 
> This patch continues the effort to refactor worqueue APIs, which has begun

Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is
tautologically useless.

Also, do

$ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process

for more details.

> with the change introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> Replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, keeping the old behavior.

What is the new behavior?

Should this driver be converted to it?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette