From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] perf: arm_spe: Add support for filtering on data source
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:48:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110154827.GA278048@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029-james-perf-feat_spe_eft-v9-2-d22536b9cf94@linaro.org>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:46:02PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> SPE_FEAT_FDS adds the ability to filter on the data source of packets.
> Like the other existing filters, enable filtering with PMSFCR_EL1.FDS
> when any of the filter bits are set.
>
> Each bit maps to data sources 0-63 described by bits[0:5] in the data
> source packet (although the full range of data source is 16 bits so
> higher value data sources can't be filtered on). The filter is an OR of
> all the bits, so for example clearing bits 0 and 3 only includes packets
> from data sources 0 OR 3.
>
> Invert the filter given by userspace so that the default value of 0 is
> equivalent to including all values (no filtering). This allows us to
> skip adding a new format bit to enable filtering and still support
> excluding all data sources which would have been a filter value of 0 if
> not for the inversion.
So from that I'm reading the config4 field will only have like 16 bits,
but here:
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_data_src_filter_CFG config4 /* inverse of PMSDSFR_EL1 */
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_data_src_filter_LO 0
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_data_src_filter_HI 63
you claim all 64 bits.
Also, afaict:
#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_CFG config2 /* PMSLATFR_EL1.MINLAT */
#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_LO 0
#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_HI 11
Still has more than 16 bits left.
So why exactly are we needing config4? Can we please get a more solid
argument?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 15:46 [PATCH v9 0/5] perf: arm_spe: Armv8.8 SPE features James Clark
2025-10-29 15:46 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] perf: Add perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-11-03 14:33 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-11 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-29 15:46 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] perf: arm_spe: Add support for filtering on data source James Clark
2025-11-10 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-11-11 10:51 ` James Clark
2025-11-11 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-29 15:46 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/perf_event.h with the kernel sources James Clark
2025-10-29 15:46 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] perf tools: Add support for perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-10-29 15:46 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] perf docs: arm-spe: Document new SPE filtering features James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110154827.GA278048@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®