From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 18/27] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch()
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:58:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251121015851.3672073-19-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121015851.3672073-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reduce overhead when completing multiple requests in batch I/O mode by
accumulating them in an io_comp_batch structure and completing them
together via blk_mq_end_request_batch(). This minimizes per-request
completion overhead and improves performance for high IOPS workloads.
The implementation adds an io_comp_batch pointer to struct ublk_io and
initializes it in __ublk_fetch(). For batch I/O, the pointer is set to
the batch structure in ublk_batch_commit_io(). The __ublk_complete_rq()
function uses io->iob to call blk_mq_add_to_batch() for batch mode.
After processing all batch I/Os, the completion callback is invoked in
ublk_handle_batch_commit_cmd() to complete all accumulated requests
efficiently.
So far just covers direct completion. For deferred completion(zero copy,
auto buffer reg), ublk_io_release() is often delayed in freeing buffer
consumer io_uring request's code path, so this patch often doesn't work,
also it is hard to pass the per-task 'struct io_comp_batch' for deferred
completion.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 90cd1863bc83..a5606c7111a4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct ublk_batch_io_data {
struct io_uring_cmd *cmd;
struct ublk_batch_io header;
unsigned int issue_flags;
+ struct io_comp_batch *iob;
};
/*
@@ -642,7 +643,12 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod_zoned(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
#endif
static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
- bool need_map);
+ bool need_map, struct io_comp_batch *iob);
+
+static void ublk_complete_batch(struct io_comp_batch *iob)
+{
+ blk_mq_end_request_batch(iob);
+}
static dev_t ublk_chr_devt;
static const struct class ublk_chr_class = {
@@ -912,7 +918,7 @@ static inline void ublk_put_req_ref(struct ublk_io *io, struct request *req)
return;
/* ublk_need_map_io() and ublk_need_req_ref() are mutually exclusive */
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, false);
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, false, NULL);
}
static inline bool ublk_sub_req_ref(struct ublk_io *io)
@@ -1251,7 +1257,7 @@ static inline struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(
/* todo: handle partial completion */
static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
- bool need_map)
+ bool need_map, struct io_comp_batch *iob)
{
unsigned int unmapped_bytes;
blk_status_t res = BLK_STS_OK;
@@ -1288,8 +1294,11 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
if (blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_OK, io->res))
blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true);
- else if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q)))
+ else if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q))) {
+ if (blk_mq_add_to_batch(req, iob, false, ublk_complete_batch))
+ return;
__blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_OK);
+ }
return;
exit:
@@ -2249,7 +2258,7 @@ static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_io *io,
blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
else {
io->res = -EIO;
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub));
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub), NULL);
}
}
@@ -2986,7 +2995,7 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)
req->__sector = addr;
if (compl)
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub));
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(ub), NULL);
if (ret)
goto out;
@@ -3321,11 +3330,11 @@ static int ublk_batch_commit_io(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)
req->__sector = ublk_batch_zone_lba(uc, elem);
if (compl)
- __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(data->ub));
+ __ublk_complete_rq(req, io, ublk_dev_need_map_io(data->ub), data->iob);
return 0;
}
-static int ublk_handle_batch_commit_cmd(const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data)
+static int ublk_handle_batch_commit_cmd(struct ublk_batch_io_data *data)
{
const struct ublk_batch_io *uc = &data->header;
struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = data->cmd;
@@ -3334,10 +3343,15 @@ static int ublk_handle_batch_commit_cmd(const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data)
.total = uc->nr_elem * uc->elem_bytes,
.elem_bytes = uc->elem_bytes,
};
+ DEFINE_IO_COMP_BATCH(iob);
int ret;
+ data->iob = &iob;
ret = ublk_walk_cmd_buf(&iter, data, ublk_batch_commit_io);
+ if (iob.complete)
+ iob.complete(&iob);
+
return iter.done == 0 ? ret : iter.done;
}
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 1:58 [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 01/27] kfifo: add kfifo_alloc_node() helper for NUMA awareness Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:12 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 5:58 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 02/27] ublk: add parameter `struct io_uring_cmd *` to ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 03/27] ublk: add `union ublk_io_buf` with improved naming Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 04/27] ublk: refactor auto buffer register in ublk_dispatch_req() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 05/27] ublk: pass const pointer to ublk_queue_is_zoned() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 06/27] ublk: add helper of __ublk_fetch() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 07/27] ublk: define ublk_ch_batch_io_fops for the coming feature F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 08/27] ublk: prepare for not tracking task context for command batch Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 09/27] ublk: add new batch command UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS & UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 10/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:47 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 19:25 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 10:25 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 16:43 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 12/27] ublk: add io events fifo structure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:53 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 3:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 13/27] ublk: add batch I/O dispatch infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 19:24 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 21:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 14/27] ublk: add UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS for batch I/O processing Ming Lei
2025-12-01 5:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 9:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:51 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 1:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 15:20 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 15/27] ublk: abort requests filled in event kfifo Ming Lei
2025-12-01 18:52 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:29 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 19:00 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 16/27] ublk: add new feature UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:16 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 16:05 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03 2:21 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 17/27] ublk: document " Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:46 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:55 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-01 21:55 ` [PATCH V4 18/27] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 19/27] selftests: ublk: fix user_data truncation for tgt_data >= 256 Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 20/27] selftests: ublk: replace assert() with ublk_assert() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 21/27] selftests: ublk: add ublk_io_buf_idx() for returning io buffer index Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 22/27] selftests: ublk: add batch buffer management infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 23/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 24/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 25/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 26/27] selftests: ublk: add --batch/-b for enabling F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 27/27] selftests: ublk: support arbitrary threads/queues combination Ming Lei
2025-11-28 11:59 ` [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-28 19:07 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-29 1:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:22 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251121015851.3672073-19-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®