From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 04/27] ublk: refactor auto buffer register in ublk_dispatch_req()
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:58:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251121015851.3672073-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121015851.3672073-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Refactor auto buffer register code and prepare for supporting batch IO
feature, and the main motivation is to put 'ublk_io' operation code
together, so that per-io lock can be applied for the code block.
The key changes are:
- Rename ublk_auto_buf_reg() as ublk_do_auto_buf_reg()
- Introduce an enum `auto_buf_reg_res` to represent the result of
the buffer registration attempt (FAIL, FALLBACK, OK).
- Split the existing `ublk_do_auto_buf_reg` function into two:
- `__ublk_do_auto_buf_reg`: Performs the actual buffer registration
and returns the `auto_buf_reg_res` status.
- `ublk_do_auto_buf_reg`: A wrapper that calls the internal function
and handles the I/O preparation based on the result.
- Introduce `ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io` to encapsulate the logic for
preparing the I/O for completion after buffer registration.
- Pass the `tag` directly to `ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback` to avoid
recalculating it.
This refactoring makes the control flow clearer and isolates the different
stages of the auto buffer registration process.
Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f1fa5ceacdf6..b36cd55eceb0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1168,17 +1168,37 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
}
static void
-ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io)
+ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned tag)
{
- unsigned tag = io - ubq->ios;
struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod = ublk_get_iod(ubq, tag);
iod->op_flags |= UBLK_IO_F_NEED_REG_BUF;
}
-static bool ublk_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
- struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
- unsigned int issue_flags)
+enum auto_buf_reg_res {
+ AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL,
+ AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK,
+ AUTO_BUF_REG_OK,
+};
+
+static void ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
+ struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
+ struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+ enum auto_buf_reg_res res)
+{
+ if (res == AUTO_BUF_REG_OK) {
+ io->task_registered_buffers = 1;
+ io->buf_ctx_handle = io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd);
+ io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
+ }
+ ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
+ __ublk_prep_compl_io_cmd(io, req);
+}
+
+static enum auto_buf_reg_res
+__ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
+ struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+ unsigned int issue_flags)
{
int ret;
@@ -1186,29 +1206,27 @@ static bool ublk_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
io->buf.auto_reg.index, issue_flags);
if (ret) {
if (io->buf.auto_reg.flags & UBLK_AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK) {
- ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(ubq, io);
- return true;
+ ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(ubq, req->tag);
+ return AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK;
}
blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
- return false;
+ return AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL;
}
- io->task_registered_buffers = 1;
- io->buf_ctx_handle = io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd);
- io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
- return true;
+ return AUTO_BUF_REG_OK;
}
-static bool ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
- struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
- struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
- unsigned int issue_flags)
+static void ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
+ struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+ unsigned int issue_flags)
{
- ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
- if (ublk_support_auto_buf_reg(ubq) && ublk_rq_has_data(req))
- return ublk_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, cmd, issue_flags);
+ enum auto_buf_reg_res res = __ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, cmd,
+ issue_flags);
- return true;
+ if (res != AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL) {
+ ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io(ubq, req, io, cmd, res);
+ io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, issue_flags);
+ }
}
static bool ublk_start_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
@@ -1281,8 +1299,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
if (!ublk_start_io(ubq, req, io))
return;
- if (ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, io->cmd, issue_flags))
+ if (ublk_support_auto_buf_reg(ubq) && ublk_rq_has_data(req)) {
+ ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, io->cmd, issue_flags);
+ } else {
+ ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, req, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, issue_flags);
+ }
}
static void ublk_cmd_tw_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 1:58 [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 01/27] kfifo: add kfifo_alloc_node() helper for NUMA awareness Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:12 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 5:58 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 02/27] ublk: add parameter `struct io_uring_cmd *` to ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 03/27] ublk: add `union ublk_io_buf` with improved naming Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 05/27] ublk: pass const pointer to ublk_queue_is_zoned() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 06/27] ublk: add helper of __ublk_fetch() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 07/27] ublk: define ublk_ch_batch_io_fops for the coming feature F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 08/27] ublk: prepare for not tracking task context for command batch Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 09/27] ublk: add new batch command UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS & UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 10/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:47 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 19:25 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 10:25 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 16:43 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 12/27] ublk: add io events fifo structure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:53 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 3:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 13/27] ublk: add batch I/O dispatch infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 19:24 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 21:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 14/27] ublk: add UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS for batch I/O processing Ming Lei
2025-12-01 5:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 9:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:51 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 1:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 15:20 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 15/27] ublk: abort requests filled in event kfifo Ming Lei
2025-12-01 18:52 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:29 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 19:00 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 16/27] ublk: add new feature UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:16 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 16:05 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03 2:21 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 17/27] ublk: document " Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:46 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02 1:55 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 18/27] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch() Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 19/27] selftests: ublk: fix user_data truncation for tgt_data >= 256 Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 20/27] selftests: ublk: replace assert() with ublk_assert() Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 21/27] selftests: ublk: add ublk_io_buf_idx() for returning io buffer index Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 22/27] selftests: ublk: add batch buffer management infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 23/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 24/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 25/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 26/27] selftests: ublk: add --batch/-b for enabling F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21 1:58 ` [PATCH V4 27/27] selftests: ublk: support arbitrary threads/queues combination Ming Lei
2025-11-28 11:59 ` [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-28 19:07 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-29 1:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:22 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251121015851.3672073-5-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®