mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
To: slava@dubeyko.com, zippel@linux-m68k.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de,
	frank.li@vivo.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	janak@mpiricsoftware.com, shardulsb08@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus: avoid re-allocating header node 0 and stop on already-hashed nodes
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 20:43:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224151347.1861896-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com> (raw)

Hi,

syzbot reported a warning and crash when mounting a corrupted HFS+ image where
the on-disk B-tree bitmap has node 0 (header node) marked free. In that case
hfs_bmap_alloc() can try to allocate node 0 and reach hfs_bnode_create() with
an already-hashed node number.

Patch 1 prevents allocating the reserved header node (node 0) even if the bitmap
is corrupted.

Patch 2 follows Slava's review suggestion and changes the "already hashed" path
in hfs_bnode_create() to return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST) instead of returning the existing
node pointer, so we don't continue in a non-"business as usual" situation.

v2 changes:
  - Implement Slava's suggestion: return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST) for already-hashed nodes.
  - Keep the node-0 allocation guard as a minimal, targeted hardening measure.

Reported-by: syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251213233215.368558-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com/

Shardul Bankar (2):
  hfsplus: skip node 0 in hfs_bmap_alloc
  hfsplus: return error when node already exists in hfs_bnode_create

 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c | 2 +-
 fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-24 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24 15:13 Shardul Bankar [this message]
2025-12-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: skip node 0 in hfs_bmap_alloc Shardul Bankar
2025-12-25  4:02   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-25  6:32     ` Shardul Bankar
2025-12-29 20:12       ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfsplus: return error when node already exists in hfs_bnode_create Shardul Bankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251224151347.1861896-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --to=shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=janak@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shardulsb08@gmail.com \
    --cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®