mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
To: slava@dubeyko.com, zippel@linux-m68k.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de,
	frank.li@vivo.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	janak@mpiricsoftware.com, shardulsb08@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] hfsplus: return error when node already exists in hfs_bnode_create
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 20:43:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224151347.1861896-3-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224151347.1861896-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>

When hfs_bnode_create() finds that a node is already hashed (which should
not happen in normal operation), it currently returns the existing node
without incrementing its reference count. This causes a reference count
inconsistency that leads to a kernel panic when the node is later freed
in hfs_bnode_put():

    kernel BUG at fs/hfsplus/bnode.c:676!
    BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&node->refcnt))

This scenario can occur when hfs_bmap_alloc() attempts to allocate a node
that is already in use (e.g., when node 0's bitmap bit is incorrectly
unset), or due to filesystem corruption.

Returning an existing node from a create path is not normal operation.

Fix this by returning ERR_PTR(-EEXIST) instead of the node when it's
already hashed. This properly signals the error condition to callers,
which already check for IS_ERR() return values.

Reported-by: syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa
Fixes: 634725a92938 ("[PATCH] hfs: cleanup HFS+ prints")
Signed-off-by: Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
---
 v2:
 - Return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST) for already-hashed nodes, per Slava's suggestion.
 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
index 191661af9677..250a226336ea 100644
--- a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_create(struct hfs_btree *tree, u32 num)
 	if (node) {
 		pr_crit("new node %u already hashed?\n", num);
 		WARN_ON(1);
-		return node;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
 	}
 	node = __hfs_bnode_create(tree, num);
 	if (!node)
-- 
2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-24 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24 15:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus: avoid re-allocating header node 0 and stop on already-hashed nodes Shardul Bankar
2025-12-24 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: skip node 0 in hfs_bmap_alloc Shardul Bankar
2025-12-25  4:02   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-25  6:32     ` Shardul Bankar
2025-12-29 20:12       ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-24 15:13 ` Shardul Bankar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251224151347.1861896-3-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --to=shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=janak@mpiricsoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shardulsb08@gmail.com \
    --cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+1c8ff72d0cd8a50dfeaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®