[PATCH] ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

[PATCH] ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

[Kery Qi]

The davinci_evm_probe() function calls of_parse_phandle() to acquire
device nodes for "ti,audio-codec" and "ti,mcasp-controller". These
functions return device nodes with incremented reference counts.

However, in several error paths (e.g., when the second of_parse_phandle(),
snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(), or devm_snd_soc_register_card() fails),
the function returns directly without releasing the acquired nodes,
leading to reference leaks.

This patch adds an error handling path 'err_put' to properly release
the device nodes using of_node_put() and clean up the pointers when
an error occurs.

Signed-off-by: Kery Qi <qikeyu2017@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
index 3848766d96c3..ad514c2e5a25 100644
--- a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
@@ -194,27 +194,32 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	dai->cpus->of_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,mcasp-controller", 0);
-	if (!dai->cpus->of_node)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!dai->cpus->of_node) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_put;
+	}
 
 	dai->platforms->of_node = dai->cpus->of_node;
 
 	evm_soc_card.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(&evm_soc_card, "ti,model");
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		goto err_put;
 
 	mclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mclk");
 	if (PTR_ERR(mclk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
-		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		goto err_put;
 	} else if (IS_ERR(mclk)) {
 		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "mclk not found.\n");
 		mclk = NULL;
 	}
 
 	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!drvdata)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!drvdata) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_put;
+	}
 
 	drvdata->mclk = mclk;
 
@@ -224,7 +229,8 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (!drvdata->mclk) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 				"No clock or clock rate defined.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_put;
 		}
 		drvdata->sysclk = clk_get_rate(drvdata->mclk);
 	} else if (drvdata->mclk) {
@@ -240,8 +246,25 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(&evm_soc_card, drvdata);
 	ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &evm_soc_card);
 
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "snd_soc_register_card failed (%d)\n", ret);
+		goto err_put;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+
+err_put:
+	dai->platforms->of_node = NULL;
+
+	if (dai->cpus->of_node) {
+		of_node_put(dai->cpus->of_node);
+		dai->cpus->of_node = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (dai->codecs->of_node) {
+		of_node_put(dai->codecs->of_node);
+		dai->codecs->of_node = NULL;
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 23:48:37 +0800, Kery Qi wrote:
> The davinci_evm_probe() function calls of_parse_phandle() to acquire
> device nodes for "ti,audio-codec" and "ti,mcasp-controller". These
> functions return device nodes with incremented reference counts.
> 
> However, in several error paths (e.g., when the second of_parse_phandle(),
> snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(), or devm_snd_soc_register_card() fails),
> the function returns directly without releasing the acquired nodes,
> leading to reference leaks.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe
      commit: 5b577d214fcc109707bcb77b4ae72a31cfd86798

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark