From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/14] reset: use lock guards in reset core
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:06:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223-reset-core-refactor-v2-7-5e5a7289190c@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223-reset-core-refactor-v2-0-5e5a7289190c@oss.qualcomm.com>
Simplify the locking code in reset core by using lock guard from
linux/cleanup.h.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/reset/core.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
index 025004989595ac60381804a7705a1eb584b63326..9fef9f972e93fb7388f27ac3bbdf68c884b72ff5 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/core.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ int reset_controller_register(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rcdev->reset_control_head);
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
list_add(&rcdev->list, &reset_controller_list);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -143,9 +143,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_controller_register);
*/
void reset_controller_unregister(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
{
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
list_del(&rcdev->list);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_controller_unregister);
@@ -646,25 +646,20 @@ int reset_control_acquire(struct reset_control *rstc)
if (reset_control_is_array(rstc))
return reset_control_array_acquire(rstc_to_array(rstc));
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
- if (rstc->acquired) {
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ if (rstc->acquired)
return 0;
- }
list_for_each_entry(rc, &rstc->rcdev->reset_control_head, list) {
if (rstc != rc && rstc->id == rc->id) {
- if (rc->acquired) {
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ if (rc->acquired)
return -EBUSY;
- }
}
}
rstc->acquired = true;
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_control_acquire);
@@ -1064,27 +1059,28 @@ __of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node, const char *id, int index,
ret = __reset_add_reset_gpio_device(node, &args);
if (ret) {
- rstc = ERR_PTR(ret);
- goto out_put;
+ of_node_put(args.np);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
}
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
rcdev = __reset_find_rcdev(&args, gpio_fallback);
if (!rcdev) {
rstc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_put;
}
if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells)) {
rstc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_put;
}
rstc_id = rcdev->of_xlate(rcdev, &args);
if (rstc_id < 0) {
rstc = ERR_PTR(rstc_id);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_put;
}
flags &= ~RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_OPTIONAL;
@@ -1092,8 +1088,6 @@ __of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node, const char *id, int index,
/* reset_list_mutex also protects the rcdev's reset_control list */
rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev, rstc_id, flags);
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
out_put:
of_node_put(args.np);
@@ -1135,10 +1129,11 @@ int __reset_control_bulk_get(struct device *dev, int num_rstcs,
return 0;
err:
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
while (i--)
__reset_control_put_internal(rstcs[i].rstc);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
+
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__reset_control_bulk_get);
@@ -1147,10 +1142,10 @@ static void reset_control_array_put(struct reset_control_array *resets)
{
int i;
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
for (i = 0; i < resets->num_rstcs; i++)
__reset_control_put_internal(resets->rstc[i]);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
kfree(resets);
}
@@ -1168,9 +1163,9 @@ void reset_control_put(struct reset_control *rstc)
return;
}
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
__reset_control_put_internal(rstc);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_control_put);
@@ -1181,10 +1176,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_control_put);
*/
void reset_control_bulk_put(int num_rstcs, struct reset_control_bulk_data *rstcs)
{
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
while (num_rstcs--)
__reset_control_put_internal(rstcs[num_rstcs].rstc);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_control_bulk_put);
@@ -1403,10 +1398,10 @@ of_reset_control_array_get(struct device_node *np, enum reset_control_flags flag
return &resets->base;
err_rst:
- mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
+
while (--i >= 0)
__reset_control_put_internal(resets->rstc[i]);
- mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
kfree(resets);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 10:06 [PATCH v2 00/14] reset: major reset core refactoring Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] reset: gpio: remove unneeded OF-node put Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] reset: gpio: add a devlink between reset-gpio and its consumer Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] reset: gpio: simplify fallback device matching Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 16:07 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] reset: gpio: remove unneeded auxiliary_set_drvdata() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] reset: warn on reset-gpio release Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 16:07 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] reset: fold ida_alloc() into reset_create_gpio_aux_device() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2026-02-23 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] reset: use lock guards in reset core Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] reset: handle removing supplier before consumers Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 10:56 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-03-05 11:11 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] reset: protect struct reset_controller_dev with its own mutex Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 10:56 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] reset: protect struct reset_control " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 10:57 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] reset: convert of_reset_control_get_count() to using firmware nodes Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 11:05 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] reset: convert the core API " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 11:10 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] reset: convert reset core " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 11:34 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-02-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] reset: gpio: make the driver fwnode-agnostic Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-04 11:34 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-03-03 8:55 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] reset: major reset core refactoring Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260223-reset-core-refactor-v2-7-5e5a7289190c@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®