[PATCH v2 01/14] reset: gpio: remove unneeded OF-node put

[Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>]

priv->rc.of_node is never set in reset core. Even if it were: tasking
the reset-gpio driver with controlling the reference count of an OF node
set up in reset core is a weird inversion of responsability. But it's
also wrong in that the underlying device never actually gets removed so
the node should not be put at all and especially not at driver detach.
Remove the devres action.

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/reset/reset-gpio.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-gpio.c b/drivers/reset/reset-gpio.c
index 0a1610d9e78a3f1db8f523654a548fbba6087106..ad5bfe27aaef7de57f9566330253333aa2b1253f 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-gpio.c
@@ -52,18 +52,12 @@ static int reset_gpio_of_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 	return reset_spec->args[0];
 }
 
-static void reset_gpio_of_node_put(void *data)
-{
-	of_node_put(data);
-}
-
 static int reset_gpio_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
 			    const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
 	struct of_phandle_args *platdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
 	struct reset_gpio_priv *priv;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (!platdata)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -83,10 +77,6 @@ static int reset_gpio_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
 	priv->rc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
 	priv->rc.dev = dev;
 	priv->rc.of_args = platdata;
-	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, reset_gpio_of_node_put,
-				       priv->rc.of_node);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
 
 	/* Cells to match GPIO specifier, but it's not really used */
 	priv->rc.of_reset_n_cells = 2;

-- 
2.47.3