From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf/x86: Move event pointer setup earlier in x86_pmu_enable()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 03:13:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310-perf-v2-1-4a3156fce43c@debian.org> (raw)
A production AMD EPYC system crashed with a NULL pointer dereference
in the PMU NMI handler:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000198
RIP: x86_perf_event_update+0xc/0xa0
Call Trace:
<NMI>
amd_pmu_v2_handle_irq+0x1a6/0x390
perf_event_nmi_handler+0x24/0x40
The faulting instruction is `cmpq $0x0, 0x198(%rdi)` with RDI=0,
corresponding to the `if (unlikely(!hwc->event_base))` check in
x86_perf_event_update() where hwc = &event->hw and event is NULL.
drgn inspection of the vmcore on CPU 106 showed a mismatch between
cpuc->active_mask and cpuc->events[]:
active_mask: 0x1e (bits 1, 2, 3, 4)
events[1]: 0xff1100136cbd4f38 (valid)
events[2]: 0x0 (NULL, but active_mask bit 2 set)
events[3]: 0xff1100076fd2cf38 (valid)
events[4]: 0xff1100079e990a90 (valid)
The event that should occupy events[2] was found in event_list[2]
with hw.idx=2 and hw.state=0x0, confirming x86_pmu_start() had run
(which clears hw.state and sets active_mask) but events[2] was
never populated.
Another event (event_list[0]) had hw.state=0x7 (STOPPED|UPTODATE|ARCH),
showing it was stopped when the PMU rescheduled events, confirming the
throttle-then-reschedule sequence occurred.
The root cause is commit 7e772a93eb61 ("perf/x86: Fix NULL event access
and potential PEBS record loss") which moved the cpuc->events[idx]
assignment out of x86_pmu_start() and into step 2 of x86_pmu_enable(),
after the PERF_HES_ARCH check. This broke any path that calls
pmu->start() without going through x86_pmu_enable() -- specifically
the unthrottle path:
perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events()
-> perf_event_unthrottle_group()
-> perf_event_unthrottle()
-> event->pmu->start(event, 0)
-> x86_pmu_start() // sets active_mask but not events[]
The race sequence is:
1. A group of perf events overflows, triggering group throttle via
perf_event_throttle_group(). All events are stopped: active_mask
bits cleared, events[] preserved (x86_pmu_stop no longer clears
events[] after commit 7e772a93eb61).
2. While still throttled (PERF_HES_STOPPED), x86_pmu_enable() runs
due to other scheduling activity. Stopped events that need to
move counters get PERF_HES_ARCH set and events[old_idx] cleared.
In step 2 of x86_pmu_enable(), PERF_HES_ARCH causes these events
to be skipped -- events[new_idx] is never set.
3. The timer tick unthrottles the group via pmu->start(). Since
commit 7e772a93eb61 removed the events[] assignment from
x86_pmu_start(), active_mask[new_idx] is set but events[new_idx]
remains NULL.
4. A PMC overflow NMI fires. The handler iterates active counters,
finds active_mask[2] set, reads events[2] which is NULL, and
crashes dereferencing it.
Move the cpuc->events[hwc->idx] assignment in x86_pmu_enable() to
before the PERF_HES_ARCH check, so that events[] is populated even
for events that are not immediately started. This ensures the
unthrottle path via pmu->start() always finds a valid event pointer.
Fixes: 7e772a93eb61 ("perf/x86: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes in v2:
- Move event pointer setup earlier in x86_pmu_enable() (peterz)
- Rewrote the patch title, given the new approach
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309-perf-v1-1-601ffb531893@debian.org
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 03ce1bc7ef2ea..54b4c315d927f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
else if (i < n_running)
continue;
+ cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = event;
+
if (hwc->state & PERF_HES_ARCH)
continue;
@@ -1379,7 +1381,6 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* if cpuc->enabled = 0, then no wrmsr as
* per x86_pmu_enable_event()
*/
- cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = event;
x86_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
}
cpuc->n_added = 0;
---
base-commit: 0bcac7b11262557c990da1ac564d45777eb6b005
change-id: 20260309-perf-fd32da0317a8
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 10:13 Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-03-11 2:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-11 16:37 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-11 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-11 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 2:53 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-13 13:23 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-13 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-13 16:57 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-16 9:50 ` [tip: perf/urgent] x86/perf: Make sure to program the counter value for stopped events on migration tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 1:46 ` [PATCH v2] perf/x86: Move event pointer setup earlier in x86_pmu_enable() Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-11 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 1:05 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-16 9:50 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260310-perf-v2-1-4a3156fce43c@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome