mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf: Validate sleepable context during restrictred pointer formatting
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:41:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317-restricted-pointers-final-v1-1-b4dca0ed6483@linutronix.de> (raw)

Depending on the system configuration, the restricted pointer formatting
might call into the security subsystem which might sleep.
As %pK is intended to be only used from read handlers of virtual files,
which always run in task context, this should never happen in practice.
However, developers have used %pK before from atomic context without
realizing this restriction. While all existing user of %pK through
printk() have been removed, new ones might be reintroduced accidentally
in the future.

Add a might_sleep(), so that misuse of %pK from atomic context is
detected right away.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250113171731-dc10e3c1-da64-4af0-b767-7c7070468023@linutronix.de/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241217142032.55793-1-acarmina@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
---
This depends on commit 5886cc8f895b ("drm/msm/dpu: Don't use %pK through
printk (again)"), which was merged in v7.0-rc2.
---
 lib/vsprintf.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 800b8ac49f53..eb9dbb28fb9b 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -862,6 +862,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack
 char *restricted_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
 			 struct printf_spec spec)
 {
+	/* Only usable from task context, The call to has_capability_noaudit() might sleep. */
+	might_sleep();
+
 	switch (kptr_restrict) {
 	case 0:
 		/* Handle as %p, hash and do _not_ leak addresses. */

---
base-commit: 2d1373e4246da3b58e1df058374ed6b101804e07
change-id: 20260107-restricted-pointers-final-cd24979fd752

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 11:41 Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2026-03-17 14:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-17 14:26   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-17 17:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-18  8:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-18 11:01   ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-18 11:03   ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-18 13:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 14:45       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-18 14:57         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 15:10           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-19  8:17             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-20  1:53 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260317-restricted-pointers-final-v1-1-b4dca0ed6483@linutronix.de \
    --to=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®