From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, kdasu.kdev@gmail.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-mem: fallback to using transfers when CS gpios are used
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 18:29:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327-renewal-poking-7ae0f0345cb9@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107044235.4864-3-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:42:35PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> Devices with chip selects driven via GPIO are not compatible with the
> spi-mem operations. Fallback to using standard spi transfers when the
> device is connected with a gpio CS.
Bitta necromancy, but why are they not compatible?
Couldn't you have just done an if/else in your driver to call
gpiod_set_value(spi_get_csgpiod())?
For some context, I've been trying to resolve some issues with using
the standard transfers code when used with flash devices in the
microchip-core-qspi driver, but if I delete this !mem->spi->cs_gpiod
check, and add the aforementioned if/else in my driver, the mem ops
work fine.
What am I missing that makes them incompatible?
Cheers,
Conor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> index 9f0fa9f3116d..e5a46f0eb93b 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> if (!spi_mem_internal_supports_op(mem, op))
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> - if (ctlr->mem_ops) {
> + if (ctlr->mem_ops && !mem->spi->cs_gpiod) {
> ret = spi_mem_access_start(mem);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 4:42 [PATCH 0/2] spi: more GPIO CS work Chris Packham
2019-11-07 4:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: bcm-qspi: Convert to use CS GPIO descriptors Chris Packham
2019-11-07 13:13 ` Applied "spi: bcm-qspi: Convert to use CS GPIO descriptors" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2019-11-07 4:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-mem: fallback to using transfers when CS gpios are used Chris Packham
2019-11-07 13:13 ` Applied "spi: spi-mem: fallback to using transfers when CS gpios are used" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2026-03-27 18:29 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-03-29 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-mem: fallback to using transfers when CS gpios are used Chris Packham
2026-03-31 2:21 ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-31 2:35 ` Chris Packham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260327-renewal-poking-7ae0f0345cb9@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®