mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
	"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 08/11] futex: Add robust futex unlock IP range
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:24:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327132455.e0PX5nfN@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319231239.682582451@kernel.org>

On 2026-03-20 00:24:46 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/futex_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/futex_types.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ struct futex_sched_data {
>  
> +struct futex_unlock_cs_range {
> +	unsigned long	       start_ip;
> +	unsigned long	       end_ip;
> +	unsigned int	       pop_size32;
> +};
> +
> +#define FUTEX_ROBUST_MAX_CS_RANGES	2
> @@ -50,6 +68,10 @@ struct futex_mm_data {
>  	atomic_long_t			phash_atomic;
>  	unsigned int			__percpu *phash_ref;
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
> +	unsigned int			unlock_cs_num_ranges;
> +	struct futex_unlock_cs_range	unlock_cs_ranges[FUTEX_ROBUST_MAX_CS_RANGES];
> +#endif
>  };

While looking at this from an economic point of view, we get:
|        unsigned int *             phash_ref;            /*    80     8 */
|        unsigned int               unlock_cs_num_ranges; /*    88     4 */
|
|        /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
|
|        struct futex_unlock_cs_range unlock_cs_ranges[2]; /*    96    48 */
|}
|struct futex_unlock_cs_range {
|        long unsigned int          start_ip;             /*     0     8 */
|        long unsigned int          end_ip;               /*     8     8 */
|        unsigned int               pop_size32;           /*    16     4 */
|
|        /* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
|        /* padding: 4 */
|        /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
|};

end_ip could be replaced with a u16 size. There is no need to have
pop_size32 as u32, it could be a u16 filling the gap.
On the other hand, pop_size32 could be passed by the caller since it is
known if it is the first or the second member / the 64bit or 32bit case.

unlock_cs_num_ranges could probably go because if start_ip == NULL then
there is no mapping since it can't be mapped at 0x0. Worst case would be
to check two variables vs NULL.

And if we replace end_ip with size then we could remove it because vdso
is known at compile so we should know the size at compile time.

Sebastian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19 23:24 [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 01/11] futex: Move futex task related data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 14:59   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 02/11] futex: Move futex related mm_struct " Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:00   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 03/11] futex: Provide UABI defines for robust list entry modifiers Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:01   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 04/11] uaccess: Provide unsafe_atomic_store_release_user() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20  9:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:07   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 05/11] x86: Select ARCH_STORE_IMPLIES_RELEASE Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:08   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 06/11] futex: Cleanup UAPI defines Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:09   ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 07/11] futex: Add support for unlocking robust futexes Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 17:14   ` André Almeida
2026-03-26 22:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27  0:48       ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 08/11] futex: Add robust futex unlock IP range Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20  9:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 13:24   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-03-27 16:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 09/11] futex: Provide infrastructure to plug the non contended robust futex unlock race Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 13:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 10/11] x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:25 ` [patch v2 11/11] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20  7:14   ` Uros Bizjak
2026-03-20 12:48     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 21:59 ` [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 22:08   ` Rich Felker
2026-03-27  3:42     ` André Almeida
2026-03-27 10:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 16:50       ` Rich Felker
2026-03-28 12:41         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260327132455.e0PX5nfN@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=triegel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome