From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 11/11] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:14:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4Y8dFE20o52bOr9Emr+1QwWCc-ghJCR4Pq2ex1ZVrR_Vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319231239.882002347@kernel.org>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:25 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> wrote:
> mov %esi,%eax // Load TID into EAX
> xor %ecx,%ecx // Set ECX to 0
> lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%rdi) // Try the TID -> 0 transition
> .Lstart:
> jnz .Lend
> movq %rcx,(%rdx) // Clear list_op_pending
> .Lend:
> ret
[...]
> + * Assembly template for the try unlock functions. The basic functionality is:
> + *
> + * mov esi, %eax Move the TID into EAX
> + * xor %ecx, %ecx Clear ECX
> + * lock_cmpxchgl %ecx, (%rdi) Attempt the TID -> 0 transition
> + * .Lcs_start: Start of the critical section
> + * jnz .Lcs_end If cmpxchl failed jump to the end
> + * .Lcs_success: Start of the success section
> + * movq %rcx, (%rdx) Set the pending op pointer to 0
> + * .Lcs_end: End of the critical section
> + *
> + * .Lcs_start and .Lcs_end establish the critical section range. .Lcs_success is
> + * technically not required, but there for illustration, debugging and testing.
> + *
> + * When CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled then the 64-bit VDSO provides two functions.
> + * One for the regular 64-bit sized pending operation pointer and one for a
> + * 32-bit sized pointer to support gaming emulators.
> + *
> + * The 32-bit VDSO provides only the one for 32-bit sized pointers.
> + */
> +#define __stringify_1(x...) #x
> +#define __stringify(x...) __stringify_1(x)
> +
> +#define LABEL(name, which) __stringify(name##_futex_try_unlock_cs_##which:)
> +
> +#define JNZ_END(name) "jnz " __stringify(name) "_futex_try_unlock_cs_end\n"
> +
> +#define CLEAR_POPQ "movq %[zero], %a[pop]\n"
> +#define CLEAR_POPL "movl %k[zero], %a[pop]\n"
> +
> +#define futex_robust_try_unlock(name, clear_pop, __lock, __tid, __pop) \
> +({ \
> + asm volatile ( \
> + " \n" \
> + " lock cmpxchgl %k[zero], %a[lock] \n" \
> + " \n" \
> + LABEL(name, start) \
> + " \n" \
> + JNZ_END(name) \
> + " \n" \
> + LABEL(name, success) \
> + " \n" \
> + clear_pop \
> + " \n" \
> + LABEL(name, end) \
> + : [tid] "+&a" (__tid) \
> + : [lock] "D" (__lock), \
> + [pop] "d" (__pop), \
> + [zero] "S" (0UL) \
[zero] represents an internal register, so the above constraint can be
"r" (*). If it remains a hard register constraint (%rsi) for some
reason then the above two comments should be updated to reflect the
new constraint.
With the constraint changed to "r":
Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> (for asm template)
(*) "r" allows the compiler some more freedom. The compiler tracks the
values in registers, so it can reuse zero from an unrelated register
without moving it to the %rsi and without clobbering the source
register. In non-trivial functions, there is a high chance that needed
value is already available in some register.
Uros.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 23:24 [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 01/11] futex: Move futex task related data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 14:59 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 02/11] futex: Move futex related mm_struct " Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:00 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 03/11] futex: Provide UABI defines for robust list entry modifiers Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:01 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 04/11] uaccess: Provide unsafe_atomic_store_release_user() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:07 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 05/11] x86: Select ARCH_STORE_IMPLIES_RELEASE Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:08 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 06/11] futex: Cleanup UAPI defines Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:09 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 07/11] futex: Add support for unlocking robust futexes Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 17:14 ` André Almeida
2026-03-26 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 0:48 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 08/11] futex: Add robust futex unlock IP range Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 13:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-27 16:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 09/11] futex: Provide infrastructure to plug the non contended robust futex unlock race Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 10/11] x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:25 ` [patch v2 11/11] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 7:14 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2026-03-20 12:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 21:59 ` [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 22:08 ` Rich Felker
2026-03-27 3:42 ` André Almeida
2026-03-27 10:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 16:50 ` Rich Felker
2026-03-28 12:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFULd4Y8dFE20o52bOr9Emr+1QwWCc-ghJCR4Pq2ex1ZVrR_Vw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=triegel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox