mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	david.kaplan@amd.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 02/11] stop_machine: Accumulate error code rather than overwrite
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 01:42:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331014251.86353-3-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331014251.86353-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

cpu_stopper_thread() invokes a stop function and collects its error code
in struct cpu_stop_done. In the multi stop-machine case, it is shared
data, but currently an arbitrary error is recorded as overwriting.

With different errors, accumulating error code instead can distinguish a
multi-error condition as bits are cumulatively set.

Convert the error recoding to accumulate return values.

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260304163335.GDaahe3wdnqxSC2yfw@fat_crate.local
---
V1 -> V2: New patch

While tried to explain its benefit here, I considered this change
deserves more discussions to ensure its impact, so RFC.
---
 include/linux/stop_machine.h | 12 ++++++------
 kernel/stop_machine.c        | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
index c753dd53e79d..2f986555113a 100644
--- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
+++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
@@ -124,9 +124,9 @@ static inline void print_stop_info(const char *log_lvl, struct task_struct *task
  * the possibility of blocking in cpus_read_lock() means that the caller
  * cannot usefully rely on this serialization.
  *
- * Return: 0 if all invocations of @fn return zero.  Otherwise, the
- * value returned by an arbitrarily chosen member of the set of calls to
- * @fn that returned non-zero.
+ * Return: 0 if all invocations of @fn return zero.  Otherwise, an
+ * accumulated return value from all invocation of @fn that returned
+ * non-zero.
  */
 int stop_machine(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data, const struct cpumask *cpus);
 
@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ int stop_machine_cpuslocked(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data, const struct cpumask *
  *
  * Context: Must be called from within a cpus_read_lock() protected region.
  *
- * Return: 0 if all invocations of @fn return zero.  Otherwise, the
- * value returned by an arbitrarily chosen member of the set of calls to
- * @fn that returned non-zero.
+ * Return: 0 if all invocations of @fn return zero.  Otherwise, an
+ * accumulated return value from all invocation of @fn that returned
+ * non-zero.
  */
 int stop_core_cpuslocked(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data);
 
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 822cf56fdc81..15268f1207e9 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
  * RETURNS:
  * -ENOENT if @fn(@arg) was not executed at all because all cpus in
  * @cpumask were offline; otherwise, 0 if all executions of @fn
- * returned 0, any non zero return value if any returned non zero.
+ * returned 0, the accumulated value of all non-zero @fn returns.
  */
 static int stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
 {
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void cpu_stopper_thread(unsigned int cpu)
 		ret = fn(arg);
 		if (done) {
 			if (ret)
-				done->ret = ret;
+				done->ret |= ret;
 			cpu_stop_signal_done(done);
 		}
 		preempt_count_dec();
@@ -674,8 +674,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stop_core_cpuslocked);
  * Local CPU is inactive.  Temporarily stops all active CPUs.
  *
  * RETURNS:
- * 0 if all executions of @fn returned 0, any non zero return value if any
- * returned non zero.
+ * 0 if all executions of @fn returned 0, otherwise the accumulated value
+ * of all non-zero @fn returns.
  */
 int stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
 				  const struct cpumask *cpus)
@@ -705,5 +705,5 @@ int stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
 		cpu_relax();
 
 	mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
-	return ret ?: done.ret;
+	return ret | done.ret;
 }
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  1:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] stop_machine: Clarify @cpus == NULL semantics Chang S. Bae
2026-07-23  4:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-31  1:42 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-08-09  2:04   ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/11] stop_machine: Accumulate error code rather than overwrite Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11  6:02     ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] stop_machine: Refactor multi-CPU stop glue code Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] stop_machine: Add NMI-based execution path Chang S. Bae
2026-04-01  2:57   ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] stop_machine: Introduce stop_machine_nmi_cpuslocked() Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/apic: Implement self-NMI support Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/nmi: Support NMI stop-machine handler Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/microcode: Distinguish NMI control path on stop-machine callback Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/microcode: Use stop-machine NMI facility Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/nmi: Simplify offline microcode handler invocation Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31  1:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/microcode: Remove microcode_nmi_handler_enable Chang S. Bae
2026-08-09  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11  6:02   ` Chang S. Bae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331014251.86353-3-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®