From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
david.kaplan@amd.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] stop_machine: Refactor multi-CPU stop glue code
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 01:42:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331014251.86353-4-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331014251.86353-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
stop_machine_cpuslocked() currently configures struct multi_stop_data and
invokes the multi-stop operation. An upcoming stop_machine() variant will
have different configurations but the latter part will be shareable.
Extract the common part into stop_multi_cpus() to highlight each unique
front-end.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
---
V1 -> V2: New patch
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 15268f1207e9..092c65c002ff 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -584,18 +584,8 @@ static int __init cpu_stop_init(void)
}
early_initcall(cpu_stop_init);
-int stop_machine_cpuslocked(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
- const struct cpumask *cpus)
+static int stop_multi_cpus(struct multi_stop_data *msdata)
{
- struct multi_stop_data msdata = {
- .fn = fn,
- .data = data,
- .num_threads = num_online_cpus(),
- .active_cpus = cpus,
- };
-
- lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
-
if (!stop_machine_initialized) {
/*
* Handle the case where stop_machine() is called
@@ -605,19 +595,34 @@ int stop_machine_cpuslocked(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(msdata.num_threads != 1);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(msdata->num_threads != 1);
local_irq_save(flags);
hard_irq_disable();
- ret = (*fn)(data);
+ ret = msdata->fn(msdata->data);
local_irq_restore(flags);
return ret;
}
/* Set the initial state and stop all online cpus. */
- set_state(&msdata, MULTI_STOP_PREPARE);
- return stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask, multi_cpu_stop, &msdata);
+ set_state(msdata, MULTI_STOP_PREPARE);
+ return stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask, multi_cpu_stop, msdata);
+}
+
+int stop_machine_cpuslocked(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
+ const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+ struct multi_stop_data msdata = {
+ .fn = fn,
+ .data = data,
+ .num_threads = num_online_cpus(),
+ .active_cpus = cpus,
+ };
+
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+ return stop_multi_cpus(&msdata);
}
int stop_machine(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data, const struct cpumask *cpus)
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 1:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] stop_machine: Clarify @cpus == NULL semantics Chang S. Bae
2026-07-23 4:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/11] stop_machine: Accumulate error code rather than overwrite Chang S. Bae
2026-08-09 2:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11 6:02 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] stop_machine: Add NMI-based execution path Chang S. Bae
2026-04-01 2:57 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] stop_machine: Introduce stop_machine_nmi_cpuslocked() Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/apic: Implement self-NMI support Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/nmi: Support NMI stop-machine handler Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/microcode: Distinguish NMI control path on stop-machine callback Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/microcode: Use stop-machine NMI facility Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/nmi: Simplify offline microcode handler invocation Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/microcode: Remove microcode_nmi_handler_enable Chang S. Bae
2026-08-09 2:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11 6:02 ` Chang S. Bae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331014251.86353-4-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®