* [PATCH] ocfs2: validate dx extent list bounds during lookup
@ 2026-04-01 1:39 ZhengYuan Huang
2026-04-03 8:30 ` Joseph Qi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: ZhengYuan Huang @ 2026-04-01 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mark, jlbec, joseph.qi
Cc: ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6, zzzccc427,
ZhengYuan Huang
[BUG]
A corrupted indexed directory can trigger a KASAN use-after-free in
ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() when the dx root or leaf extent list carries
an out-of-range l_count or l_next_free_rec value.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec+0x6f7/0x880 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:813
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888043b7b0e0 by task syz.0.3467/8031
Call Trace:
<TASK>
...
ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec+0x6f7/0x880 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:813
ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup+0x100/0x5d0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:868
ocfs2_dx_dir_search+0x7bc/0x11c0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:928
ocfs2_find_entry_dx fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1042 [inline]
ocfs2_find_entry+0x97e/0xce0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1079
ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0xa9/0x2f0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2002
ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0xae/0x110 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2024
ocfs2_lookup+0x45e/0x860 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:122
lookup_open.isra.0+0x4a2/0x1460 fs/namei.c:3774
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3895 [inline]
path_openat+0x11fe/0x2ce0 fs/namei.c:4131
do_filp_open+0x1f6/0x430 fs/namei.c:4161
do_sys_openat2+0x117/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1437
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1468 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1463 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x15b/0x220 fs/open.c:1463
...
[CAUSE]
ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() only checked for an empty extent list before
iterating over the directory index records. It did not verify that the
root dx list fits within a dx root block, or that the leaf list fits
within an extent block.
Comparing l_next_free_rec only against the on-disk l_count is also not
enough because l_count itself can be corrupted.
[FIX]
Validate both the dx root list and the leaf extent list against their
physical record capacities before indexing into l_recs[]. Use
ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root() for the root and
ocfs2_extent_recs_per_eb() for the leaf block so the bounds check does
not trust on-disk sizing fields.
Fixes: 9b7895efac90 ("ocfs2: Add a name indexed b-tree to directory inodes")
Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index b82fe4431eb1..3403c0d3810e 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -790,15 +790,25 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
struct buffer_head *eb_bh = NULL;
struct ocfs2_extent_block *eb;
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *rec = NULL;
+ unsigned int max_recs;
- if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) !=
- ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb)) {
+ max_recs = ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb);
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) != max_recs) {
ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
"Inode %llu has invalid extent list length %u\n",
inode->i_ino, le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
goto out;
}
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) > max_recs) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
+ "Inode %llu has invalid dx root next free %u, max %u\n",
+ inode->i_ino,
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
+ max_recs);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (el->l_tree_depth) {
ret = ocfs2_find_leaf(INODE_CACHE(inode), el, major_hash,
&eb_bh);
@@ -817,6 +827,27 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
(unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr);
goto out;
}
+
+ max_recs = ocfs2_extent_recs_per_eb(inode->i_sb);
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) != max_recs) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
+ "Inode %llu has invalid tree block %llu list count %u, max %u\n",
+ inode->i_ino,
+ (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr,
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_count),
+ max_recs);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) > max_recs) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
+ "Inode %llu has invalid tree block %llu next free %u, max %u\n",
+ inode->i_ino,
+ (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr,
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
+ max_recs);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: validate dx extent list bounds during lookup
2026-04-01 1:39 [PATCH] ocfs2: validate dx extent list bounds during lookup ZhengYuan Huang
@ 2026-04-03 8:30 ` Joseph Qi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2026-04-03 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang
Cc: ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6, zzzccc427,
Mark Fasheh, Joel Becker
This makes ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() messy.
And I think the right place to do this check is ocfs2_validate_dx_root()
and ocfs2_validate_extent_block() during read from disk.
I'll rework it and send out later.
Thanks,
Joseph
On 4/1/26 9:39 AM, ZhengYuan Huang wrote:
> [BUG]
> A corrupted indexed directory can trigger a KASAN use-after-free in
> ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() when the dx root or leaf extent list carries
> an out-of-range l_count or l_next_free_rec value.
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec+0x6f7/0x880 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:813
> Read of size 4 at addr ffff888043b7b0e0 by task syz.0.3467/8031
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ...
> ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec+0x6f7/0x880 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:813
> ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup+0x100/0x5d0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:868
> ocfs2_dx_dir_search+0x7bc/0x11c0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:928
> ocfs2_find_entry_dx fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1042 [inline]
> ocfs2_find_entry+0x97e/0xce0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1079
> ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0xa9/0x2f0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2002
> ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0xae/0x110 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2024
> ocfs2_lookup+0x45e/0x860 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:122
> lookup_open.isra.0+0x4a2/0x1460 fs/namei.c:3774
> open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3895 [inline]
> path_openat+0x11fe/0x2ce0 fs/namei.c:4131
> do_filp_open+0x1f6/0x430 fs/namei.c:4161
> do_sys_openat2+0x117/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1437
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
> __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1468 [inline]
> __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1463 [inline]
> __x64_sys_openat+0x15b/0x220 fs/open.c:1463
> ...
>
> [CAUSE]
> ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() only checked for an empty extent list before
> iterating over the directory index records. It did not verify that the
> root dx list fits within a dx root block, or that the leaf list fits
> within an extent block.
>
> Comparing l_next_free_rec only against the on-disk l_count is also not
> enough because l_count itself can be corrupted.
>
> [FIX]
> Validate both the dx root list and the leaf extent list against their
> physical record capacities before indexing into l_recs[]. Use
> ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root() for the root and
> ocfs2_extent_recs_per_eb() for the leaf block so the bounds check does
> not trust on-disk sizing fields.
>
> Fixes: 9b7895efac90 ("ocfs2: Add a name indexed b-tree to directory inodes")
> Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index b82fe4431eb1..3403c0d3810e 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -790,15 +790,25 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
> struct buffer_head *eb_bh = NULL;
> struct ocfs2_extent_block *eb;
> struct ocfs2_extent_rec *rec = NULL;
> + unsigned int max_recs;
>
> - if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) !=
> - ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb)) {
> + max_recs = ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb);
> + if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) != max_recs) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> "Inode %llu has invalid extent list length %u\n",
> inode->i_ino, le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) > max_recs) {
> + ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> + "Inode %llu has invalid dx root next free %u, max %u\n",
> + inode->i_ino,
> + le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
> + max_recs);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (el->l_tree_depth) {
> ret = ocfs2_find_leaf(INODE_CACHE(inode), el, major_hash,
> &eb_bh);
> @@ -817,6 +827,27 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
> (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr);
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + max_recs = ocfs2_extent_recs_per_eb(inode->i_sb);
> + if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) != max_recs) {
> + ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> + "Inode %llu has invalid tree block %llu list count %u, max %u\n",
> + inode->i_ino,
> + (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr,
> + le16_to_cpu(el->l_count),
> + max_recs);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) > max_recs) {
> + ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> + "Inode %llu has invalid tree block %llu next free %u, max %u\n",
> + inode->i_ino,
> + (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr,
> + le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
> + max_recs);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-03 8:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-01 1:39 [PATCH] ocfs2: validate dx extent list bounds during lookup ZhengYuan Huang
2026-04-03 8:30 ` Joseph Qi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome