mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: fix wrong LCN in run_remove_range() when splitting a run
Date: Fri,  8 May 2026 17:52:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508095245.78254-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com> (raw)

When run_remove_range() removes a middle portion of a non-sparse run,
it splits the run into head and tail parts.  The tail is inserted via
run_add_entry() but uses the original r->lcn as its starting LCN
instead of advancing it by the split offset.

For example, removing VCN range [10, 20) from a run
{vcn=0, lcn=100, len=30} should produce:
  {vcn=0,  lcn=100, len=10}   (head)
  {vcn=20, lcn=120, len=10}   (tail, lcn advanced by 20)

But the current code produces:
  {vcn=0,  lcn=100, len=10}
  {vcn=20, lcn=100, len=10}   (wrong: points to same physical clusters)

This creates overlapping physical mappings in the in-memory run tree,
which can corrupt cluster allocation decisions and lead to data
corruption.

The correct pattern is already used in run_insert_range():
  CLST lcn2 = r->lcn == SPARSE_LCN ? SPARSE_LCN : (r->lcn + len1);

Apply the same logic in run_remove_range().

Fixes: 10d7c95af043 ("fs/ntfs3: add delayed-allocation (delalloc) support")
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
---
 fs/ntfs3/run.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/run.c b/fs/ntfs3/run.c
index 1ce7d92fb274..cca6bdf2e7aa 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/run.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/run.c
@@ -1292,9 +1292,12 @@ bool run_remove_range(struct runs_tree *run, CLST vcn, CLST len, CLST *done)
 
 		if (r_end > end) {
 			/* Remove a middle part, split. */
+			CLST tail_lcn = r->lcn == SPARSE_LCN ?
+					SPARSE_LCN : (r->lcn + (end - r->vcn));
+
 			*done += len;
 			r->len = d;
-			return run_add_entry(run, end, r->lcn, r_end - end,
+			return run_add_entry(run, end, tail_lcn, r_end - end,
 					     false);
 		}
 		/* Remove tail of run .*/
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08  9:52 Zhan Xusheng [this message]
2026-05-26 10:02 ` Konstantin Komarov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508095245.78254-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    --to=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®