From: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: fix wrong LCN in run_remove_range() when splitting a run
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <796d10d5-7aef-470d-a2fb-3d5d70a95805@paragon-software.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508095245.78254-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
On 5/8/26 11:52, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> When run_remove_range() removes a middle portion of a non-sparse run,
> it splits the run into head and tail parts. The tail is inserted via
> run_add_entry() but uses the original r->lcn as its starting LCN
> instead of advancing it by the split offset.
>
> For example, removing VCN range [10, 20) from a run
> {vcn=0, lcn=100, len=30} should produce:
> {vcn=0, lcn=100, len=10} (head)
> {vcn=20, lcn=120, len=10} (tail, lcn advanced by 20)
>
> But the current code produces:
> {vcn=0, lcn=100, len=10}
> {vcn=20, lcn=100, len=10} (wrong: points to same physical clusters)
>
> This creates overlapping physical mappings in the in-memory run tree,
> which can corrupt cluster allocation decisions and lead to data
> corruption.
>
> The correct pattern is already used in run_insert_range():
> CLST lcn2 = r->lcn == SPARSE_LCN ? SPARSE_LCN : (r->lcn + len1);
>
> Apply the same logic in run_remove_range().
>
> Fixes: 10d7c95af043 ("fs/ntfs3: add delayed-allocation (delalloc) support")
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/ntfs3/run.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/run.c b/fs/ntfs3/run.c
> index 1ce7d92fb274..cca6bdf2e7aa 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/run.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/run.c
> @@ -1292,9 +1292,12 @@ bool run_remove_range(struct runs_tree *run, CLST vcn, CLST len, CLST *done)
>
> if (r_end > end) {
> /* Remove a middle part, split. */
> + CLST tail_lcn = r->lcn == SPARSE_LCN ?
> + SPARSE_LCN : (r->lcn + (end - r->vcn));
> +
> *done += len;
> r->len = d;
> - return run_add_entry(run, end, r->lcn, r_end - end,
> + return run_add_entry(run, end, tail_lcn, r_end - end,
> false);
> }
> /* Remove tail of run .*/
Hello,
Queued for the next merge window, thank you.
Regards,
Konstantin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 9:52 Zhan Xusheng
2026-05-26 10:02 ` Konstantin Komarov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=796d10d5-7aef-470d-a2fb-3d5d70a95805@paragon-software.com \
--to=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®