[PATCH v3 0/3] gpio: add kunit tests for GPIO core

[PATCH v3 0/3] gpio: add kunit tests for GPIO core

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

This series adds a first batch of kunit tests for GPIO core. I intend to
gradually add more coverage for functionalities that can't really be
tested from user-space with the existing kernel selftests or libgpiod
tests.

Merging strategy: with an Ack from kunit maintainers, this can go
through the GPIO tree for v7.2.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Make kunit_platform_device_unregister() handle both cases of platform
  devices created with kunit_platform_device_alloc() +
  kunit_platform_device_add() and kunit_platform_device_register_full()
  (sashiko)
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520-gpiolib-kunit-v2-0-cc9db39881da@oss.qualcomm.com

Changes in v2:
- Remove cases of kunit killing a thread on test failure with device lock
  taken
- Fix a platform device leak on test failure
- New patch: provide kunit_platform_device_unregister()
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260518-gpiolib-kunit-v1-0-131ec646c4df@oss.qualcomm.com

---
Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
      kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_register_full()
      kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_unregister()
      gpio: add kunit test cases for the GPIO subsystem

 drivers/gpio/Kconfig            |   8 +
 drivers/gpio/Makefile           |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c    | 358 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/kunit/platform_device.h |   6 +
 lib/kunit/platform.c            |  64 +++++++
 5 files changed, 437 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 80dd246accce631c328ea43294e53b2b2dd2aa32
change-id: 20260326-gpiolib-kunit-d7f1b5541ffa

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>

[PATCH v3 1/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_register_full()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

Provide a kunit-managed variant of platform_device_register_full().

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 include/kunit/platform_device.h |  4 ++++
 lib/kunit/platform.c            | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/kunit/platform_device.h b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
index f8236a8536f7ebcee6b0e00a7bd799a14b345c1b..8cad6e1c3e7efba862862b579089f2f317784a73 100644
--- a/include/kunit/platform_device.h
+++ b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
@@ -6,10 +6,14 @@ struct completion;
 struct kunit;
 struct platform_device;
 struct platform_driver;
+struct platform_device_info;
 
 struct platform_device *
 kunit_platform_device_alloc(struct kunit *test, const char *name, int id);
 int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev);
+struct platform_device *
+kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
+				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo);
 
 int kunit_platform_device_prepare_wait_for_probe(struct kunit *test,
 						 struct platform_device *pdev,
diff --git a/lib/kunit/platform.c b/lib/kunit/platform.c
index 0b518de26065d65dac3bd49dd94a4b3e7ea0634b..583b50b538c79599ebbf33e261fe2e9ced35efa9 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/platform.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/platform.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/device/bus.h>
 #include <linux/device/driver.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
 #include <kunit/platform_device.h>
@@ -130,6 +131,36 @@ int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_add);
 
+/**
+ * kunit_platform_device_register_full() - Register a KUnit test-managed platform
+ *                                         device described by platform device info
+ * @test: test context
+ * @pdevinfo: platform device information describing the new device
+ *
+ * Register a test-managed platform device. The device is unregistered when the
+ * test completes.
+ *
+ * Return: New platform device on success, IS_ERR() on error.
+ */
+struct platform_device *
+kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
+				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	int ret;
+
+	pdev = platform_device_register_full(pdevinfo);
+	if (IS_ERR(pdev))
+		return pdev;
+
+	ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, platform_device_unregister_wrapper, pdev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+	return pdev;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_register_full);
+
 struct kunit_platform_device_probe_nb {
 	struct completion *x;
 	struct device *dev;

-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_register_full()

[David Gow]

Le 22/05/2026 à 9:42 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> Provide a kunit-managed variant of platform_device_register_full().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

Thanks! This looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>

Cheers,
-- David

>  include/kunit/platform_device.h |  4 ++++
>  lib/kunit/platform.c            | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/platform_device.h b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> index f8236a8536f7ebcee6b0e00a7bd799a14b345c1b..8cad6e1c3e7efba862862b579089f2f317784a73 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> @@ -6,10 +6,14 @@ struct completion;
>  struct kunit;
>  struct platform_device;
>  struct platform_driver;
> +struct platform_device_info;
>  
>  struct platform_device *
>  kunit_platform_device_alloc(struct kunit *test, const char *name, int id);
>  int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev);
> +struct platform_device *
> +kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
> +				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo);
>  
>  int kunit_platform_device_prepare_wait_for_probe(struct kunit *test,
>  						 struct platform_device *pdev,
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/platform.c b/lib/kunit/platform.c
> index 0b518de26065d65dac3bd49dd94a4b3e7ea0634b..583b50b538c79599ebbf33e261fe2e9ced35efa9 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/platform.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/platform.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
>  #include <linux/device/bus.h>
>  #include <linux/device/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
>  #include <kunit/platform_device.h>
> @@ -130,6 +131,36 @@ int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_add);
>  
> +/**
> + * kunit_platform_device_register_full() - Register a KUnit test-managed platform
> + *                                         device described by platform device info
> + * @test: test context
> + * @pdevinfo: platform device information describing the new device
> + *
> + * Register a test-managed platform device. The device is unregistered when the
> + * test completes.
> + *
> + * Return: New platform device on success, IS_ERR() on error.
> + */
> +struct platform_device *
> +kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
> +				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	pdev = platform_device_register_full(pdevinfo);
> +	if (IS_ERR(pdev))
> +		return pdev;
> +
> +	ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, platform_device_unregister_wrapper, pdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	return pdev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_register_full);
> +
>  struct kunit_platform_device_probe_nb {
>  	struct completion *x;
>  	struct device *dev;
> 

[PATCH v3 2/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_unregister()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

Tests may want to unregister a platform device as part of the test case
logic. Using the regular platform_device_register() with kunit
assertions may result in a platform device leak or otherwise requires
cumbersome error handling. Provide a function that unregisters a
kunit-managed platform device and drops the release action from the
test's list.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 include/kunit/platform_device.h |  2 ++
 lib/kunit/platform.c            | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/kunit/platform_device.h b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
index 8cad6e1c3e7efba862862b579089f2f317784a73..eee565d5d1d35c1d1bc82b45eb91d21d00c68428 100644
--- a/include/kunit/platform_device.h
+++ b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev);
 struct platform_device *
 kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
 				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo);
+void kunit_platform_device_unregister(struct kunit *test,
+				      struct platform_device *pdev);
 
 int kunit_platform_device_prepare_wait_for_probe(struct kunit *test,
 						 struct platform_device *pdev,
diff --git a/lib/kunit/platform.c b/lib/kunit/platform.c
index 583b50b538c79599ebbf33e261fe2e9ced35efa9..737758d710b2839fab29c5cbcf3bc5ba00e20094 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/platform.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/platform.c
@@ -161,6 +161,39 @@ kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_register_full);
 
+static bool
+kunit_platform_device_add_match(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res,
+				void *match_data)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev = match_data;
+
+	return res->data == pdev && res->free == kunit_platform_device_add_exit;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kunit_platform_device_unregister() - Unregister a KUnit-managed platform device
+ * @test: test context
+ * @pdev: platform device to unregister
+ *
+ * Unregister a test-managed platform device and cancel its release action.
+ */
+void kunit_platform_device_unregister(struct kunit *test,
+				      struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct kunit_resource *res;
+
+	res = kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_platform_device_add_match, pdev);
+	if (res) {
+		res->free = NULL;
+		kunit_put_resource(res);
+	} else {
+		kunit_remove_action(test, platform_device_unregister_wrapper, pdev);
+	}
+
+	platform_device_unregister(pdev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_unregister);
+
 struct kunit_platform_device_probe_nb {
 	struct completion *x;
 	struct device *dev;

-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_unregister()

[David Gow]

Le 22/05/2026 à 9:42 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> Tests may want to unregister a platform device as part of the test case
> logic. Using the regular platform_device_register() with kunit
> assertions may result in a platform device leak or otherwise requires
> cumbersome error handling. Provide a function that unregisters a
> kunit-managed platform device and drops the release action from the
> test's list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

Looks good, thanks.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>

Cheers,
-- David

>  include/kunit/platform_device.h |  2 ++
>  lib/kunit/platform.c            | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/platform_device.h b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> index 8cad6e1c3e7efba862862b579089f2f317784a73..eee565d5d1d35c1d1bc82b45eb91d21d00c68428 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/platform_device.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ int kunit_platform_device_add(struct kunit *test, struct platform_device *pdev);
>  struct platform_device *
>  kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
>  				    const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo);
> +void kunit_platform_device_unregister(struct kunit *test,
> +				      struct platform_device *pdev);
>  
>  int kunit_platform_device_prepare_wait_for_probe(struct kunit *test,
>  						 struct platform_device *pdev,
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/platform.c b/lib/kunit/platform.c
> index 583b50b538c79599ebbf33e261fe2e9ced35efa9..737758d710b2839fab29c5cbcf3bc5ba00e20094 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/platform.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/platform.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,39 @@ kunit_platform_device_register_full(struct kunit *test,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_register_full);
>  
> +static bool
> +kunit_platform_device_add_match(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res,
> +				void *match_data)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = match_data;
> +
> +	return res->data == pdev && res->free == kunit_platform_device_add_exit;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kunit_platform_device_unregister() - Unregister a KUnit-managed platform device
> + * @test: test context
> + * @pdev: platform device to unregister
> + *
> + * Unregister a test-managed platform device and cancel its release action.
> + */
> +void kunit_platform_device_unregister(struct kunit *test,
> +				      struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct kunit_resource *res;
> +
> +	res = kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_platform_device_add_match, pdev);
> +	if (res) {
> +		res->free = NULL;
> +		kunit_put_resource(res);
> +	} else {
> +		kunit_remove_action(test, platform_device_unregister_wrapper, pdev);
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_platform_device_unregister);
> +
>  struct kunit_platform_device_probe_nb {
>  	struct completion *x;
>  	struct device *dev;
> 

[PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: add kunit test cases for the GPIO subsystem

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

Add a module containing kunit test cases for GPIO core. The idea is to
use it to test functionalities that can't easily be tested from
user-space with kernel selftests or GPIO character device test suites
provided by the libgpiod package.

For now add test cases that verify software node based lookup and ensure
that a GPIO provider unbinding with active consumers does not cause a
crash.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig         |   8 +
 drivers/gpio/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c | 358 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 367 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index 00fcab5d09a4294ed778cea78af5867a0f6e481b..0306005fb7d65ae85905e967b9065fd74db753db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ config GPIO_CDEV_V1
 	  This ABI version is deprecated.
 	  Please use the latest ABI for new developments.
 
+config GPIO_KUNIT
+	tristate "Build GPIO Kunit test cases"
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  Say Y here to build the module containing Kunit test cases verifying
+	  the functionality of the GPIO subsystem.
+
 config GPIO_GENERIC
 	depends on HAS_IOMEM # Only for IOMEM drivers
 	tristate
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index 2ea47d9d3dca948e1cdc46965e83b0e1b6de5f70..c66b6dd659b16b80b6bb6b15fac3e3f462dec596 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI)		+= gpiolib-acpi.o
 gpiolib-acpi-y			:= gpiolib-acpi-core.o gpiolib-acpi-quirks.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)		+= gpiolib-swnode.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED)	+= gpiolib-shared.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_KUNIT)	+= gpiolib-kunit.o
 
 # Device drivers. Generally keep list sorted alphabetically
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_REGMAP)	+= gpio-regmap.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..380b68f879e55433668353bb88067d561142a5bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries
+ */
+
+#include <linux/fwnode.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/property.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+
+#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#define GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER		"gpio-test-provider"
+#define GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER	"gpio-swnode-test-consumer"
+#define GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER	"gpio-unbind-test-consumer"
+
+static int gpio_test_provider_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
+}
+
+static int gpio_test_provider_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int gpio_test_provider_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc;
+
+	gc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	gc->base = -1;
+	gc->ngpio = 4;
+	gc->label = "gpio-swnode-consumer-test-device";
+	gc->parent = dev;
+	gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+	gc->get_direction = gpio_test_provider_get_direction;
+	gc->set = gpio_test_provider_set;
+
+	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, gc, NULL);
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver gpio_test_provider_driver = {
+	.probe = gpio_test_provider_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct software_node gpio_test_provider_swnode = {
+	.name = "gpio-test-provider-primary",
+};
+
+struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata {
+	bool gpio_ok;
+};
+
+static const struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata gpio_swnode_pdata_template = {
+	.gpio_ok = false,
+};
+
+static int gpio_swnode_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+	struct gpio_desc *desc;
+
+	desc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "foo", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(desc))
+		return PTR_ERR(desc);
+
+	pdata->gpio_ok = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver gpio_swnode_consumer_driver = {
+	.probe = gpio_swnode_consumer_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
+	},
+};
+
+static void gpio_swnode_lookup_by_primary(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata;
+	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+	struct property_entry properties[2];
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	bool bound = false;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_swnode_consumer_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+	};
+
+	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
+					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.data = &gpio_swnode_pdata_template,
+		.size_data = sizeof(gpio_swnode_pdata_template),
+		.properties = properties,
+	};
+
+	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+	wait_for_device_probe();
+	scoped_guard(device, &pdev->dev)
+		bound = device_is_bound(&pdev->dev);
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
+
+	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, pdata->gpio_ok);
+}
+
+static void gpio_swnode_lookup_by_secondary(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata;
+	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+	struct property_entry properties[2];
+	struct fwnode_handle *primary;
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	bool bound = false;
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Can't live on the stack as it will still get referenced in cleanup
+	 * path after this function returns.
+	 */
+	primary = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*primary), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, primary);
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_swnode_consumer_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	fwnode_init(primary, NULL);
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.fwnode = primary,
+		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+	};
+
+	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
+					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.data = &gpio_swnode_pdata_template,
+		.size_data = sizeof(gpio_swnode_pdata_template),
+		.properties = properties,
+	};
+
+	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+	wait_for_device_probe();
+	scoped_guard(device, &pdev->dev)
+		bound = device_is_bound(&pdev->dev);
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
+
+	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, pdata->gpio_ok);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case gpio_swnode_lookup_tests[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_swnode_lookup_by_primary),
+	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_swnode_lookup_by_secondary),
+	{ }
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite gpio_swnode_lookup_test_suite = {
+	.name = "gpio-swnode-lookup",
+	.test_cases = gpio_swnode_lookup_tests,
+};
+
+static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(gpio_unbind_notifier);
+
+struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct gpio_desc *desc;
+	struct notifier_block nb;
+	int set_retval;
+};
+
+static int gpio_unbind_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+			      void *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *drvdata =
+		container_of(nb, struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata, nb);
+	struct device *dev = data;
+
+	if (dev != drvdata->dev)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	drvdata->set_retval = gpiod_set_value_cansleep(drvdata->desc, 0);
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static void gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier(void *data)
+{
+	struct notifier_block *nb = data;
+
+	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&gpio_unbind_notifier, nb);
+}
+
+static int gpio_unbind_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *data;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	data->dev = dev;
+
+	data->desc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "foo", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(data->desc))
+		return PTR_ERR(data->desc);
+
+	data->nb.notifier_call = gpio_unbind_notify;
+	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_unbind_notifier, &data->nb);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier, &data->nb);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver gpio_unbind_consumer_driver = {
+	.probe = gpio_unbind_consumer_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER,
+	},
+};
+
+static void gpio_unbind_with_consumers(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *cons_data;
+	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+	struct property_entry properties[2];
+	struct platform_device *prvd, *cons;
+	bool bound = false;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_unbind_consumer_driver);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+	};
+
+	prvd = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prvd);
+
+	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
+					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
+					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
+
+	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+		.name = GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER,
+		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+		.properties = properties,
+	};
+
+	cons = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cons);
+
+	wait_for_device_probe();
+	scoped_guard(device, &cons->dev)
+		bound = device_is_bound(&cons->dev);
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
+
+	kunit_platform_device_unregister(test, prvd);
+
+	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_unbind_notifier, 0, &cons->dev);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, NOTIFY_OK);
+
+	scoped_guard(device, &cons->dev) {
+		cons_data = platform_get_drvdata(cons);
+		ret = cons_data->set_retval;
+	}
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, -ENODEV);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_unbind_with_consumers),
+	{ }
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite gpio_unbind_with_consumers_test_suite = {
+	.name = "gpio-unbind-with-consumers",
+	.test_cases = gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(
+	&gpio_swnode_lookup_test_suite,
+	&gpio_unbind_with_consumers_test_suite,
+);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for the GPIO subsystem");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: add kunit test cases for the GPIO subsystem

[David Gow]

Le 22/05/2026 à 9:42 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> Add a module containing kunit test cases for GPIO core. The idea is to
> use it to test functionalities that can't easily be tested from
> user-space with kernel selftests or GPIO character device test suites
> provided by the libgpiod package.
> 
> For now add test cases that verify software node based lookup and ensure
> that a GPIO provider unbinding with active consumers does not cause a
> crash.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

This is a nice looking test, thanks.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>

Happy for this (and the previous two patches) to go in via gpio, but if
you'd rather them go in via the KUnit tree, let me know.

Cheers,
-- David

>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig         |   8 +
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c | 358 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 367 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 00fcab5d09a4294ed778cea78af5867a0f6e481b..0306005fb7d65ae85905e967b9065fd74db753db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ config GPIO_CDEV_V1
>  	  This ABI version is deprecated.
>  	  Please use the latest ABI for new developments.
>  
> +config GPIO_KUNIT
> +	tristate "Build GPIO Kunit test cases"
> +	depends on KUNIT
> +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here to build the module containing Kunit test cases verifying
> +	  the functionality of the GPIO subsystem.
> +


FYI: If you want to add CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y to
tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config, we can enable these tests
when the --alltests flag is passed to kunit.py.

>  config GPIO_GENERIC
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM # Only for IOMEM drivers
>  	tristate
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index 2ea47d9d3dca948e1cdc46965e83b0e1b6de5f70..c66b6dd659b16b80b6bb6b15fac3e3f462dec596 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI)		+= gpiolib-acpi.o
>  gpiolib-acpi-y			:= gpiolib-acpi-core.o gpiolib-acpi-quirks.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)		+= gpiolib-swnode.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED)	+= gpiolib-shared.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_KUNIT)	+= gpiolib-kunit.o
>  
>  # Device drivers. Generally keep list sorted alphabetically
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_REGMAP)	+= gpio-regmap.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..380b68f879e55433668353bb88067d561142a5bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/fwnode.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/property.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#define GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER		"gpio-test-provider"
> +#define GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER	"gpio-swnode-test-consumer"
> +#define GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER	"gpio-unbind-test-consumer"
> +
> +static int gpio_test_provider_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +	return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_test_provider_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_test_provider_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct gpio_chip *gc;
> +
> +	gc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!gc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	gc->base = -1;
> +	gc->ngpio = 4;
> +	gc->label = "gpio-swnode-consumer-test-device";
> +	gc->parent = dev;
> +	gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +
> +	gc->get_direction = gpio_test_provider_get_direction;
> +	gc->set = gpio_test_provider_set;
> +
> +	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, gc, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver gpio_test_provider_driver = {
> +	.probe = gpio_test_provider_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct software_node gpio_test_provider_swnode = {
> +	.name = "gpio-test-provider-primary",
> +};
> +
> +struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata {
> +	bool gpio_ok;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata gpio_swnode_pdata_template = {
> +	.gpio_ok = false,
> +};
> +
> +static int gpio_swnode_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +	struct gpio_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "foo", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +	if (IS_ERR(desc))
> +		return PTR_ERR(desc);
> +
> +	pdata->gpio_ok = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver gpio_swnode_consumer_driver = {
> +	.probe = gpio_swnode_consumer_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static void gpio_swnode_lookup_by_primary(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata;
> +	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> +	struct property_entry properties[2];
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	bool bound = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_swnode_consumer_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +	};
> +
> +	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> +	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
> +					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.data = &gpio_swnode_pdata_template,
> +		.size_data = sizeof(gpio_swnode_pdata_template),
> +		.properties = properties,
> +	};
> +
> +	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> +	wait_for_device_probe();
> +	scoped_guard(device, &pdev->dev)
> +		bound = device_is_bound(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
> +
> +	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, pdata->gpio_ok);
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_swnode_lookup_by_secondary(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_swnode_consumer_pdata *pdata;
> +	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> +	struct property_entry properties[2];
> +	struct fwnode_handle *primary;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	bool bound = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Can't live on the stack as it will still get referenced in cleanup
> +	 * path after this function returns.
> +	 */
> +	primary = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*primary), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, primary);
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_swnode_consumer_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	fwnode_init(primary, NULL);
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.fwnode = primary,
> +		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +	};
> +
> +	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> +	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
> +					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_SWNODE_TEST_CONSUMER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.data = &gpio_swnode_pdata_template,
> +		.size_data = sizeof(gpio_swnode_pdata_template),
> +		.properties = properties,
> +	};
> +
> +	pdev = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> +	wait_for_device_probe();
> +	scoped_guard(device, &pdev->dev)
> +		bound = device_is_bound(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
> +
> +	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, pdata->gpio_ok);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case gpio_swnode_lookup_tests[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_swnode_lookup_by_primary),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_swnode_lookup_by_secondary),
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite gpio_swnode_lookup_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "gpio-swnode-lookup",
> +	.test_cases = gpio_swnode_lookup_tests,
> +};
> +
> +static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(gpio_unbind_notifier);
> +
> +struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct gpio_desc *desc;
> +	struct notifier_block nb;
> +	int set_retval;
> +};
> +
> +static int gpio_unbind_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> +			      void *data)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *drvdata =
> +		container_of(nb, struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata, nb);
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +
> +	if (dev != drvdata->dev)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	drvdata->set_retval = gpiod_set_value_cansleep(drvdata->desc, 0);
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct notifier_block *nb = data;
> +
> +	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&gpio_unbind_notifier, nb);
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_unbind_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *data;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data->dev = dev;
> +
> +	data->desc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "foo", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->desc))
> +		return PTR_ERR(data->desc);
> +
> +	data->nb.notifier_call = gpio_unbind_notify;
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_unbind_notifier, &data->nb);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier, &data->nb);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver gpio_unbind_consumer_driver = {
> +	.probe = gpio_unbind_consumer_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static void gpio_unbind_with_consumers(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *cons_data;
> +	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> +	struct property_entry properties[2];
> +	struct platform_device *prvd, *cons;
> +	bool bound = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_test_provider_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &gpio_unbind_consumer_driver);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_TEST_PROVIDER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.swnode = &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +	};
> +
> +	prvd = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prvd);
> +
> +	properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO("foo-gpios",
> +					    &gpio_test_provider_swnode,
> +					    0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +	properties[1] = (struct property_entry){ };
> +
> +	pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
> +		.name = GPIO_UNBIND_TEST_CONSUMER,
> +		.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +		.properties = properties,
> +	};
> +
> +	cons = kunit_platform_device_register_full(test, &pdevinfo);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cons);
> +
> +	wait_for_device_probe();
> +	scoped_guard(device, &cons->dev)
> +		bound = device_is_bound(&cons->dev);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, bound);
> +
> +	kunit_platform_device_unregister(test, prvd);
> +
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_unbind_notifier, 0, &cons->dev);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, NOTIFY_OK);
> +
> +	scoped_guard(device, &cons->dev) {
> +		cons_data = platform_get_drvdata(cons);
> +		ret = cons_data->set_retval;
> +	}
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, -ENODEV);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(gpio_unbind_with_consumers),
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite gpio_unbind_with_consumers_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "gpio-unbind-with-consumers",
> +	.test_cases = gpio_unbind_with_consumers_tests,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> +	&gpio_swnode_lookup_test_suite,
> +	&gpio_unbind_with_consumers_test_suite,
> +);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for the GPIO subsystem");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: add kunit test cases for the GPIO subsystem

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 11:07 AM David Gow <david@davidgow.net> wrote:
>
> Le 22/05/2026 à 9:42 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski a écrit :
> > Add a module containing kunit test cases for GPIO core. The idea is to
> > use it to test functionalities that can't easily be tested from
> > user-space with kernel selftests or GPIO character device test suites
> > provided by the libgpiod package.
> >
> > For now add test cases that verify software node based lookup and ensure
> > that a GPIO provider unbinding with active consumers does not cause a
> > crash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
>
> This is a nice looking test, thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
>
> Happy for this (and the previous two patches) to go in via gpio, but if
> you'd rather them go in via the KUnit tree, let me know.
>

I'll take it through the GPIO tree, thanks.

> Cheers,
> -- David
>
> >  drivers/gpio/Kconfig         |   8 +
> >  drivers/gpio/Makefile        |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c | 358 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 367 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > index 00fcab5d09a4294ed778cea78af5867a0f6e481b..0306005fb7d65ae85905e967b9065fd74db753db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ config GPIO_CDEV_V1
> >         This ABI version is deprecated.
> >         Please use the latest ABI for new developments.
> >
> > +config GPIO_KUNIT
> > +     tristate "Build GPIO Kunit test cases"
> > +     depends on KUNIT
> > +     default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> > +     help
> > +       Say Y here to build the module containing Kunit test cases verifying
> > +       the functionality of the GPIO subsystem.
> > +
>
>
> FYI: If you want to add CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y to
> tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config, we can enable these tests
> when the --alltests flag is passed to kunit.py.
>

Sure, I'll send a separate patch for this.

Bart

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] gpio: add kunit tests for GPIO core

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 3:42 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> This series adds a first batch of kunit tests for GPIO core. I intend to
> gradually add more coverage for functionalities that can't really be
> tested from user-space with the existing kernel selftests or libgpiod
> tests.
>
> Merging strategy: with an Ack from kunit maintainers, this can go
> through the GPIO tree for v7.2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>

The series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] gpio: add kunit tests for GPIO core

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Fri, 22 May 2026 15:42:15 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> This series adds a first batch of kunit tests for GPIO core. I intend to
> gradually add more coverage for functionalities that can't really be
> tested from user-space with the existing kernel selftests or libgpiod
> tests.
> 
> Merging strategy: with an Ack from kunit maintainers, this can go
> through the GPIO tree for v7.2.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_register_full()
      https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/4c237ab773c93959aa2a7750f9dba772b5f1baee
[2/3] kunit: provide kunit_platform_device_unregister()
      https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/136569e6bc7b2d62e6777ef47caf0a417d70bf4a
[3/3] gpio: add kunit test cases for the GPIO subsystem
      https://git.kernel.org/brgl/c/a6d2a3b403cbcbcdb3ffdb63e52ac090c1003d05

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>