mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] pps: convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:37:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522143729.5nICtzAv@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4271939B-F5ED-4746-8C94-CD96F85285B3@by-online.de>

On 2026-04-25 19:21:14 [+0200], Michael Byczkowski wrote:
> Convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock from spinlock_t to raw_spinlock_t. This
> lock is held in pps_kc_event() which calls hardpps(). hardpps() takes
> tk_core.lock which is already a raw_spinlock — nesting a sleeping lock
> (PREEMPT_RT spinlock_t) over a raw_spinlock is invalid.
> 
> The locked section only checks a pointer comparison and calls
> hardpps(), both of which are non-sleeping.
> 
> On non-RT kernels, raw_spinlock_t compiles to identical code as
> spinlock_t — no behavioral change.

This looks okay. You need to swap patch #2 and #3 - this needs to come
first.

The bracket placement is terrible in pps_kc_bind(). Maybe if you swap to
guard() it becomes readable as a side effect.

> Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
> Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
> Tested-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-25 17:18 [PATCH v5 0/3] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance Michael Byczkowski
2026-04-25 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq and threaded parts Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-22 14:25   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-04-25 17:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT Michael Byczkowski
2026-04-25 17:21   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] pps: convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock " Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-22 14:37     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-05-22 14:33   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pps: convert pps_device lock " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-16 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-19 16:19   ` Calvin Owens
2026-05-22 15:56     ` Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-23 17:57       ` Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-22 14:13   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-23 17:58     ` Michael Byczkowski
2026-05-26 18:34       ` Michael Byczkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260522143729.5nICtzAv@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=by@by-online.de \
    --cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®