* [PATCH 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task"
@ 2026-06-01 10:52 Vladislav Nikolaev
2026-06-01 13:59 ` Fedor Pchelkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladislav Nikolaev @ 2026-06-01 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Vladislav Nikolaev, Zhu Yanjun, Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe,
Haggai Eran, Kamal Heib, Amir Vadai, Moni Shoua, Yonatan Cohen,
Leon Romanovsky, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, Zhu Yanjun,
lvc-project, syzbot+cfcc1a3c85be15a40cba, Zhu Yanjun
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
commit b2b1ddc457458fecd1c6f385baa9fbda5f0c63ad upstream.
In the function rxe_create_qp(), rxe_qp_from_init() is called to
initialize qp, internally things like rxe_init_task are not setup until
rxe_qp_init_req().
If an error occurred before this point then the unwind will call
rxe_cleanup() and eventually to rxe_qp_do_cleanup()/rxe_cleanup_task()
which will oops when trying to access the uninitialized spinlock.
If rxe_init_task is not executed, rxe_cleanup_task will not be called.
Reported-by: syzbot+cfcc1a3c85be15a40cba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=fd85757b74b3eb59f904138486f755f71e090df8
Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Fixes: 2d4b21e0a291 ("IB/rxe: Prevent from completer to operate on non valid QP")
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413101115.1366068-1-yanjun.zhu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladislav Nikolaev <vlad102nikolaev@gmail.com>
---
Backport fix for CVE-2023-54028
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
index 13b237d93a61..687d4419388f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
@@ -785,8 +785,11 @@ void rxe_qp_destroy(struct rxe_qp *qp)
del_timer_sync(&qp->rnr_nak_timer);
}
- rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->req.task);
- rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->comp.task);
+ if (qp->req.task.func)
+ rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->req.task);
+
+ if (qp->comp.task.func)
+ rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->comp.task);
/* flush out any receive wr's or pending requests */
if (qp->req.task.func)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task"
2026-06-01 10:52 [PATCH 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task" Vladislav Nikolaev
@ 2026-06-01 13:59 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2026-06-03 12:42 ` Vladislav Nikolaev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fedor Pchelkin @ 2026-06-01 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladislav Nikolaev
Cc: stable, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Haggai Eran, lvc-project,
Leon Romanovsky, Yonatan Cohen, linux-rdma, Zhu Yanjun,
Amir Vadai, Kamal Heib, linux-kernel, Jason Gunthorpe,
Doug Ledford, Zhu Yanjun, Moni Shoua, Zhu Yanjun,
syzbot+cfcc1a3c85be15a40cba
On Mon, 01. Jun 13:52, Vladislav Nikolaev wrote:
> @@ -785,8 +785,11 @@ void rxe_qp_destroy(struct rxe_qp *qp)
> del_timer_sync(&qp->rnr_nak_timer);
> }
>
> - rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->req.task);
> - rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->comp.task);
> + if (qp->req.task.func)
> + rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->req.task);
> +
> + if (qp->comp.task.func)
> + rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->comp.task);
>
> /* flush out any receive wr's or pending requests */
> if (qp->req.task.func)
There is another
rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->resp.task);
call at the start of rxe_qp_destroy() in 5.10/5.15 kernels. Should that
be taken into account as well, like in upstream commit?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task"
2026-06-01 13:59 ` Fedor Pchelkin
@ 2026-06-03 12:42 ` Vladislav Nikolaev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladislav Nikolaev @ 2026-06-03 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fedor Pchelkin
Cc: Vladislav Nikolaev, stable, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Zhu Yanjun,
Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, Haggai Eran, Kamal Heib,
Amir Vadai, Moni Shoua, Yonatan Cohen, Leon Romanovsky,
linux-rdma, linux-kernel, Zhu Yanjun, lvc-project
On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 at 06:59:11 -0700, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> There is another
>
> rxe_cleanup_task(&qp->resp.task);
>
> call at the start of rxe_qp_destroy() in 5.10/5.15 kernels. Should that
> be taken into account as well, like in upstream commit?
Thanks for the review. Yes, you are right. I have sent v2 which takes
the responder task cleanup into account by matching the upstream cleanup
order and adding the missing qp->resp.task.func check.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-03 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-01 10:52 [PATCH 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task" Vladislav Nikolaev
2026-06-01 13:59 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2026-06-03 12:42 ` Vladislav Nikolaev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®