mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 6/9] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid()
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:16:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610081621.GE49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609050222.2458129-7-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>


Would not something like so work?

I could not find a reason we *have* to init arch lbr that early -- but
perhaps I didn't look hard enough?

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index d9488ade0f8e..4e551f240b2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -7534,14 +7534,14 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	struct attribute **td_attr    = &empty_attrs;
 	struct attribute **mem_attr   = &empty_attrs;
 	struct attribute **tsx_attr   = &empty_attrs;
+	struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu;
+	unsigned int fixed_mask;
 	union cpuid10_edx edx;
 	union cpuid10_eax eax;
 	union cpuid10_ebx ebx;
-	unsigned int fixed_mask;
+	int version, i, ret;
 	bool pmem = false;
-	int version, i;
 	char *name;
-	struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu;
 
 	/* Architectural Perfmon was introduced starting with Core "Yonah" */
 	if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON)) {
@@ -7611,9 +7611,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.lbr_read = intel_pmu_lbr_read_32;
 	}
 
-	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
-		intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init();
-
 	intel_pebs_init();
 
 	x86_add_quirk(intel_arch_events_quirk); /* Install first, so it runs last */
@@ -8216,7 +8213,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		 *
 		 * Initialize the common PerfMon capabilities here.
 		 */
-		intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = grt_latency_data;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = adl_get_event_constraints;
@@ -8274,7 +8273,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	case INTEL_METEORLAKE:
 	case INTEL_METEORLAKE_L:
 	case INTEL_ARROWLAKE_U:
-		intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = cmt_latency_data;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = mtl_get_event_constraints;
@@ -8313,7 +8314,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		name = "lunarlake_hybrid";
 
 	lnl_common:
-		intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = lnl_latency_data;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = mtl_get_event_constraints;
@@ -8337,7 +8340,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		break;
 
 	case INTEL_ARROWLAKE_H:
-		intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small_tiny);
+		ret = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small_tiny);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = arl_h_latency_data;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = arl_h_get_event_constraints;
@@ -8371,7 +8376,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	case INTEL_NOVALAKE_L:
 		pr_cont("Novalake Hybrid events, ");
 		name = "novalake_hybrid";
-		intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		ret  = intel_pmu_init_hybrid(hybrid_big_small);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = nvl_latency_data;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = mtl_get_event_constraints;
@@ -8478,6 +8485,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 	intel_pmu_check_event_constraints_all(NULL);
 
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init();
+
 	/*
 	 * Access LBR MSR may cause #GP under certain circumstances.
 	 * Check all LBR MSR here.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  5:02 [Patch v2 0/9] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 1/9] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 2/9] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 3/9] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 14:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 4/9] perf/x86/intel: Fallback to sw branch type decoding if no hw decoding Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 14:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:53     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 5/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop LBR entries whose privilege level mismatches br_sel Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:57     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 6/9] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10  8:16   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-10  8:34     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 7/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10  8:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  8:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  8:50     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 11:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 11:42         ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 22:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 8/9] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10  9:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-11  6:17     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 9/9] perf/core: Check kernel access when kernel callchains are requested Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610081621.GE49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome