Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] perf/dwc_pcie: Convert to faux device interface

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:34:59 +0800
"Yicong Yang" <yang.yicong@picoheart.com> wrote:

> The DWC PCIe PMU makes use of the platform device interface but
> is not the real device, it's actually the RAS DES capability of
> the root port. It's more appropriate to use the lightweight
> faux framework to abstract this, it'll be more simple and no
> need for the complete device and drivers model. So convert to
> the faux device interface.
I'd perhaps add a little here to say that he cpu hp callbacks might
be reordered wrt to the registration.  That looks fine to me but
it's a little more complex than this patch description made me think.

> 
> No functional changes intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yang.yicong@picoheart.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> index abf50f173202..fee040f8b833 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
>  #include <linux/pcie-dwc.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/device/faux.h>
>  
Why there?  Seems like they are alphabetical order so should be up
under d.

Other than that looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>