mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qyousef@layalina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v3] sched/fair: Set next buddy for preempt short
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:08:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626080828.GJ1181229@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtAcOVUjLEU+MegjtEKUPbp=aXK-wz_cNhOf8mgqM7QEEA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 09:02:09AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> > But I suppose you want to violate the strict deadline order, but in that
> 
> yeah, and make sure that next is eligible
> 
> > case we should still order on slice length. We should not set next when
> > we already have one that is a shorter slice, no?
> 
> set_next_buddy() is only called for PREEMPT_WAKEUP_SHORT which is only
> used when (pse->slice < se->slice) with this patchset

Right, but you can get multiple wakeups, and in that case you want to
preserve the shortest slice, right?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24 15:12 [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Improve scheduling latency of short slice task Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/6 v3] sched/fair: Set next buddy for preempt short Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25  6:24   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 12:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25 12:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  6:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  7:02         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26  8:08           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-26  8:55             ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Take into account current's lag when updating slice protection Vincent Guittot
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 3/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Update slice protection even when resched is already set Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26  7:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  7:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30  9:03       ` [tip: sched/core] sched/core: Fix inter-class wakeup_preempt() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Update slice protection even when resched is already set tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 4/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Cancel slice protection if short slice task is eligible Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25  6:00   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 12:40     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26  5:51       ` Shubhang Kaushik
2026-06-26  7:39         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 5/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Always update slice protection Vincent Guittot
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
2026-06-24 15:12 ` [PATCH 6/6 v3] sched/eevdf: Speedup short slice task scheduling Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25  7:37   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-25 10:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-25 12:57         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25 12:59           ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25 22:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  3:57               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26  6:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  7:05                 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26  7:18                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  7:54                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  8:55                       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-26 13:55                         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-29 14:25                           ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25 14:55       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25 12:51     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-25  8:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30  9:03   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626080828.GJ1181229@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome