From: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com
To: zhangzhanpeng.jasper@bytedance.com
Cc: ajones@ventanamicro.com, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com,
alex@ghiti.fr, anup@brainfault.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
atish.patra@linux.dev, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com,
fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com, guoren@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pjw@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, tjeznach@rivosinc.com, will@kernel.org,
yuanzhu@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: KVM/IOMMU: Fix MRIF irqfd notice handling
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 20:38:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703123835.41006-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701040017.42707-1-zhangzhanpeng.jasper@bytedance.com>
>Hi Fangyu,
>
>I put together a local test branch based on Andrew's RISC-V IOMMU
>irqbypass series [1] and your MRIF RFC series [2], then ran VFIO device
>assignment tests on hardware on top of that combined tree.
>
>One test case that exposed a problem was a VFIO guest started with QEMU's
>AIA emulation mode, e.g. `riscv-aia=emul`. The guest could hang because
>a normal MSI injection was classified as a MRIF notice, so KVM skipped
>the software IMSIC EIP update and the interrupt was never made pending.
>
>The issue is that the current code identifies a MRIF notice by comparing
>the injected guest interrupt ID with cached host MSI data:
>
> msg->data == iid
>
>That is a payload value comparison, not a source/provenance check. A
>normal MSI injection can carry the same interrupt ID value as a cached
>host MSI message. If the vCPU is currently using the software IMSIC file
>and this collision happens, KVM can misclassify the normal MSI as a MRIF
>notice, skip the software IMSIC EIP update, and leave the guest waiting
>for an interrupt that was never made pending.
Hi Zhanpeng,
Thanks for reviewing and testing my patches, and for pointing out
the race condition issues. Your analysis is very helpful.
A few notes on the current status:
My original patches were based on Andrew Jones's tree [1]. Andrew
has since published a v2 [2], and I have adapted my work on top of
that version with some additional fixes. However, Andrew's v2 still
needs further adjustments, so I plan to rebase onto his v3 once it
is available.
When I send out my v2, I will take your patchset into consideration.
Thanks again for your effort.
[1] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/tree/riscv/
iommu-irqbypass-rfc-v2-rc1
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/
20250920203851.2205115-20-ajones@ventanamicro.com/
Fangyu
>This series identifies MRIF notices by irqfd route provenance instead.
>irqfd_wakeup() already injects from a seqcount-protected copy of
>irqfd->irq_entry, so patch 2 keeps the architecture's MRIF notice metadata
>in that route snapshot. Userspace MSI injection and normal guest MSI
>injection do not carry irqfd MRIF provenance and therefore follow the
>normal software IMSIC path.
>
>The generic KVM change is needed because the decision must be made from
>the same copied route that irqfd_wakeup() injects from; keeping the
>provenance in RISC-V side state would not be tied to that route snapshot.
>
>Feel free to fold any of these patches into previous commits if you think
>that is a better shape for the next version. I also have a few other local
>adaptation and improvement patches on top, but kept them out of this series
>to focus on the MRIF notice issue. Please let me know if you already have a
>plan for the next revision, I am happy to support your next version in
>whichever form is useful.
>
>Zhanpeng Zhang (3):
> iommu/riscv: Complete MRIF MSI PTE setup
> KVM: Move irqfd arch data into route snapshots
> RISC-V: KVM: Identify MRIF notices from irqfd snapshots
>
>These patches are based on a combined tree, not a plain upstream tree.
>The combined tree is made up of the following pieces:
>In your series, patch 4/6 is already covered by the irqbypass series [1].
>I ported patches 1/6, 2/6, 3/6, the relevant MRIF MSI PTE part of 5/6,
>and the notice handler part of 6/6, with a few integration changes.
>
>Fangyu Yu's MRIF RFC series [2] (selected patches):
> [1/6] RISC-V: Add more elements to irqbypass vcpu_info
> [2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Transfer the physical address of MRIF to iommu-ir
> [3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Add a xarray to record host irq msg
> [5/6, adapted] iommu/riscv: Add MRIF mode support
> [6/6, adapted] RISC-V: KVM: Check the MRIF in notice MSI irq handler
>
>Andrew Jones et al. [1] (irqbypass series, omitted):
> [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] iommu/riscv: Add irqbypass support
>
>[1] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/2025-September/010148.html
>[2] https://lwn.net/ml/all/20250811061104.10326-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 6:10 [RFC PATCH 0/6] iommu/riscv: Add MRIF support fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: Add more elements to irqbypass vcpu_info fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Transfer the physical address of MRIF to iommu-ir fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Add a xarray to record host irq msg fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] iommu/riscv: Add irq_mask and irq_ack configure for iommu-ir fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] iommu/riscv: Add MRIF mode support fangyu.yu
2025-08-11 6:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] RISC-V: KVM: Check the MRIF in notice MSI irq handler fangyu.yu
2026-07-01 4:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: KVM/IOMMU: Fix MRIF irqfd notice handling Zhanpeng Zhang
2026-07-01 4:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] iommu/riscv: Complete MRIF MSI PTE setup Zhanpeng Zhang
2026-07-01 4:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] KVM: Move irqfd arch data into route snapshots Zhanpeng Zhang
2026-07-01 4:00 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: Identify MRIF notices from irqfd snapshots Zhanpeng Zhang
2026-07-03 12:38 ` fangyu.yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703123835.41006-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tjeznach@rivosinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuanzhu@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhangzhanpeng.jasper@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®