From: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH slab/for-next v4 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:44:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-4-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-0-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org>
__kfree_rcu_sheaf() cannot invoke call_rcu() when spinning is not
allowed and IRQs are disabled. To relax the limitation, extend the
deferred free fallback so that a full rcu sheaf can be submitted to
call_rcu() via the existing IRQ work.
Since the deferred mechanism does more than deferred freeing of objects,
rename the struct to deferred_percpu_work and adjust names accordingly.
When a sheaf is queued on an IRQ work, it is detached from
pcs->rcu_free but call_rcu() is not invoked until the irq_work runs.
To keep the kvfree_rcu barrier's promise, call irq_work_sync() on each
CPU before calling rcu_barrier().
In the meantime, remove the TODO item as apparently there is no simple
and effective way to achieve that. This is because, unlike sheaves,
kfree_rcu() batches objects from different caches together.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
---
mm/slab.h | 2 +-
mm/slab_common.c | 7 ++---
mm/slub.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 85ef2ebc9812..fdd293b3efa5 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ void __kmem_obj_info(struct kmem_obj_info *kpp, void *object, struct slab *slab)
void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
const struct slab *slab, bool to_user);
-void defer_free_barrier(void);
+void deferred_work_barrier(void);
static inline bool slub_debug_orig_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
{
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index e07b4e6d6679..9c9ae1384f47 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
}
/* Wait for deferred work from kmalloc/kfree_nolock() */
- defer_free_barrier();
+ deferred_work_barrier();
cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
@@ -2113,13 +2113,10 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
cpus_read_lock();
flush_rcu_sheaves_on_cache(s);
cpus_read_unlock();
+ deferred_work_barrier();
rcu_barrier();
}
- /*
- * TODO: Introduce a version of __kvfree_rcu_barrier() that works
- * on a specific slab cache.
- */
__kvfree_rcu_barrier();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache);
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 680fe64aff72..8afa6b47b1f2 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ struct slab_sheaf {
union {
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
struct list_head barn_list;
+ /* only used to defer call_rcu() in unknown context */
+ struct llist_node llnode;
/* only used for prefilled sheafs */
struct {
unsigned int capacity;
@@ -4077,6 +4079,20 @@ static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
cpus_read_unlock();
}
+struct deferred_percpu_work {
+ struct llist_head objects;
+ struct llist_head rcu_sheaves;
+ struct irq_work work;
+};
+
+static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work);
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct deferred_percpu_work, deferred_percpu_work) = {
+ .objects = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects),
+ .rcu_sheaves = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(rcu_sheaves),
+ .work = IRQ_WORK_INIT(deferred_percpu_work_fn),
+};
+
static void flush_rcu_sheaf(struct work_struct *w)
{
struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
@@ -4148,6 +4164,7 @@ void flush_all_rcu_sheaves(void)
mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
+ deferred_work_barrier();
rcu_barrier();
}
@@ -6136,16 +6153,6 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
if (likely(rcu_sheaf->size < s->sheaf_capacity)) {
rcu_sheaf = NULL;
} else {
- /*
- * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
- * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
- * we know that's not the case.
- */
- if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
- rcu_sheaf->size--;
- local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
- goto fail;
- }
pcs->rcu_free = NULL;
rcu_sheaf->node = numa_node_id();
}
@@ -6154,8 +6161,22 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
* we flush before local_unlock to make sure a racing
* flush_all_rcu_sheaves() doesn't miss this sheaf
*/
- if (rcu_sheaf)
- call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
+ if (rcu_sheaf) {
+ /*
+ * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
+ * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
+ * we know that's not the case.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
+ struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
+
+ dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
+ if (llist_add(&rcu_sheaf->llnode, &dpw->rcu_sheaves))
+ irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
+ } else {
+ call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
+ }
+ }
local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
@@ -6354,31 +6375,21 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
}
}
-struct defer_free {
- struct llist_head objects;
- struct irq_work work;
-};
-
-static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work);
-
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct defer_free, defer_free_objects) = {
- .objects = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects),
- .work = IRQ_WORK_INIT(free_deferred_objects),
-};
-
/*
* In PREEMPT_RT irq_work runs in per-cpu kthread, so it's safe
* to take sleeping spin_locks from __slab_free().
* In !PREEMPT_RT irq_work will run after local_unlock_irqrestore().
*/
-static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work)
+static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work)
{
- struct defer_free *df = container_of(work, struct defer_free, work);
- struct llist_head *objs = &df->objects;
+ struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
+ struct llist_head *objs, *rcu_sheaves;
struct llist_node *llnode, *pos, *t;
+ struct slab_sheaf *sheaf, *next;
- if (llist_empty(objs))
- return;
+ dpw = container_of(work, struct deferred_percpu_work, work);
+ rcu_sheaves = &dpw->rcu_sheaves;
+ objs = &dpw->objects;
llnode = llist_del_all(objs);
llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) {
@@ -6402,27 +6413,31 @@ static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work)
__slab_free(s, slab, x, x, 1, _THIS_IP_);
stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
}
+
+ llnode = llist_del_all(rcu_sheaves);
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(sheaf, next, llnode, llnode)
+ call_rcu(&sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
}
static void defer_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *head)
{
- struct defer_free *df;
+ struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
guard(preempt)();
head = kasan_reset_tag(head);
- df = this_cpu_ptr(&defer_free_objects);
- if (llist_add(head + s->offset, &df->objects))
- irq_work_queue(&df->work);
+ dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
+ if (llist_add(head + s->offset, &dpw->objects))
+ irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
}
-void defer_free_barrier(void)
+void deferred_work_barrier(void)
{
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- irq_work_sync(&per_cpu_ptr(&defer_free_objects, cpu)->work);
+ irq_work_sync(&per_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work, cpu)->work);
}
static __fastpath_inline
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 12:44 [PATCH slab/for-next v4 0/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 1/8] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 3:27 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-22 7:16 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 8:32 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 2/8] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 10:07 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:28 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 7:37 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 3/8] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 12:44 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle) [this message]
2026-07-20 13:03 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 10:27 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-24 11:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-24 14:10 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 5/8] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 5:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-23 9:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-23 10:02 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-21 10:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:41 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 6/8] mm/slab: introduce struct kvfree_rcu_head for kvfree_rcu batching Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 7/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 13:09 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 8:15 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 10:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 8/8] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-4-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®