From: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH slab/for-next v4 8/8] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:44:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-8-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-0-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org>
When slub_kunit is not built-in, call kfree_rcu() and kfree_rcu_nolock()
to test kfree_rcu_nolock() in slub_kunit.
Rename the test case as the test covers more _nolock() APIs.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
---
lib/tests/slub_kunit.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c b/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
index a391467c1aa6..e3b63f0338d5 100644
--- a/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
@@ -162,7 +162,10 @@ static void test_kmalloc_redzone_access(struct kunit *test)
}
struct test_kfree_rcu_struct {
- struct rcu_head rcu;
+ union {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct kvfree_rcu_head kvrcu;
+ };
};
static void test_kfree_rcu(struct kunit *test)
@@ -296,7 +299,7 @@ static void test_krealloc_redzone_zeroing(struct kunit *test)
#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) || (defined(CONFIG_KPROBES) && defined(CONFIG_SMP))
#define NR_ITERATIONS 1000
#define NR_OBJECTS 1000
-static void *objects[NR_OBJECTS];
+static struct test_kfree_rcu_struct *objects[NR_OBJECTS];
struct test_nolock_context {
struct kunit *test;
@@ -311,13 +314,14 @@ struct test_nolock_context {
#endif
};
-static void test_kmalloc_kfree(void)
+static void test_kmalloc_and_friends(void)
{
int i, j;
+ bool can_use_kfree_rcu = !IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SLUB_KUNIT_TEST);
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERATIONS; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < NR_OBJECTS; j++) {
- gfp_t gfp = (i % 2) ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT;
+ gfp_t gfp = (i & 1) ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT;
objects[j] = kmalloc_obj(*objects[j], gfp);
if (!objects[j]) {
@@ -328,26 +332,35 @@ static void test_kmalloc_kfree(void)
}
}
- for (j = 0; j < NR_OBJECTS; j++)
- kfree(objects[j]);
+ for (j = 0; j < NR_OBJECTS; j++) {
+ if (can_use_kfree_rcu && (i & 2))
+ kfree_rcu(objects[j], rcu);
+ else
+ kfree(objects[j]);
+ }
}
}
static void test_nolock(struct test_nolock_context *ctx)
{
- void *objp;
+ struct test_kfree_rcu_struct *objp;
gfp_t gfp;
+ bool can_use_kfree_rcu = !IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SLUB_KUNIT_TEST);
/* __GFP_ACCOUNT to test kmalloc_nolock() in alloc_slab_obj_exts() */
- gfp = (ctx->callback_count % 2) ? 0 : __GFP_ACCOUNT;
- objp = kmalloc_nolock(64, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+ gfp = (ctx->callback_count & 1) ? 0 : __GFP_ACCOUNT;
+ objp = kmalloc_nolock(sizeof(*objp), gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE);
if (objp)
ctx->alloc_ok++;
else
ctx->alloc_fail++;
- kfree_nolock(objp);
+ if (can_use_kfree_rcu && (ctx->callback_count & 2))
+ kfree_rcu_nolock(objp, kvrcu);
+ else
+ kfree_nolock(objp);
+
ctx->callback_count++;
}
#endif
@@ -397,14 +410,14 @@ static void disable_perf_events(struct test_nolock_context *ctx)
perf_event_release_kernel(ctx->event);
}
-static void test_kmalloc_kfree_nolock_perf(struct kunit *test)
+static void test_kmalloc_nolock_and_friends_perf(struct kunit *test)
{
struct test_nolock_context ctx = { .test = test };
if (!enable_perf_events(&ctx))
kunit_skip(test, "Failed to enable perf event, skipping");
- test_kmalloc_kfree();
+ test_kmalloc_and_friends();
disable_perf_events(&ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, slab_errors);
@@ -438,14 +451,14 @@ static void unregister_slab_kprobes(struct test_nolock_context *ctx)
unregister_kprobe(&ctx->kprobe);
}
-static void test_kmalloc_kfree_nolock_kprobe(struct kunit *test)
+static void test_kmalloc_nolock_and_friends_kprobe(struct kunit *test)
{
struct test_nolock_context ctx = { .test = test };
if (!register_slab_kprobes(&ctx))
kunit_skip(test, "Failed to register kprobe, skipping");
- test_kmalloc_kfree();
+ test_kmalloc_and_friends();
unregister_slab_kprobes(&ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, slab_errors);
@@ -477,10 +490,10 @@ static struct kunit_case test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(test_leak_destroy),
KUNIT_CASE(test_krealloc_redzone_zeroing),
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
- KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(test_kmalloc_kfree_nolock_perf),
+ KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(test_kmalloc_nolock_and_friends_perf),
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_KPROBES) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(test_kmalloc_kfree_nolock_kprobe),
+ KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(test_kmalloc_nolock_and_friends_kprobe),
#endif
{}
};
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 12:44 [PATCH slab/for-next v4 0/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 1/8] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 3:27 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-22 7:16 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 8:32 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 2/8] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 10:07 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:28 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 7:37 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 3/8] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 10:27 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-24 11:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-24 14:10 ` hu.shengming
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 5/8] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 5:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-23 9:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-23 10:02 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-21 10:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:41 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 6/8] mm/slab: introduce struct kvfree_rcu_head for kvfree_rcu batching Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 7:42 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next v4 7/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-20 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 13:09 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 8:15 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-22 10:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-22 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-20 12:44 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720-kfree_rcu_nolock-v4-8-964e03c41a4e@kernel.org \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®