[PATCH v2] media: i2c: mt9t112: fix incorrect PTR_ERR() call on non-error pointer

[Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>]

In mt9t112_probe(), the clock error check after devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get()
calls PTR_ERR(priv->clk) unconditionally, before testing IS_ERR().

On a successful lookup, priv->clk is a valid pointer and calling PTR_ERR()
on it is incorrect API usage.  While the comparison against -ENOENT happens
to be harmless in practice (valid kernel pointers never fall in the error
range), this is still a violation of the IS_ERR()/PTR_ERR() contract that
can mislead readers.

Restructure the check to guard PTR_ERR() inside IS_ERR(), using the
simpler != -ENOENT form to avoid an unnecessary else clause.

Signed-off-by: Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
index bd2268154ca7..b3a6c6d76632 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
@@ -1079,11 +1079,12 @@ static int mt9t112_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, client, &mt9t112_subdev_ops);
 
 	priv->clk = devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get(&client->dev, "extclk");
-	if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) == -ENOENT)
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
+		if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT)
+			return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
+					     "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
 		priv->clk = NULL;
-	else if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
-		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
-				     "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
+	}
 
 	priv->standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "standby",
 						     GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
-- 
2.55.0