From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>
Cc: jacopo@jmondi.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: mt9t112: fix missing IS_ERR() check before PTR_ERR()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:34:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al4HvRWaRAMFPUrQ@kekkonen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720105935.16894-1-udaykhare77@gmail.com>
Hi Uday,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 04:29:35PM +0530, Uday Khare wrote:
> In mt9t112_probe(), the -ENOENT check after devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get() is
> missing an IS_ERR() guard.
>
> Without IS_ERR(), PTR_ERR(priv->clk) is executed unconditionally,
> including on successful clock lookups where priv->clk points to a valid
> struct clk pointer. Calling PTR_ERR() on a valid pointer reinterprets its
> address as a signed long integer; the result is arbitrary and leads to an
> invalid comparison against -ENOENT.
How can the result be arbitrary? Both are the same size.
The patch addresses an API usage issue but I don't think there was an
actual bug there.
>
> Fix this by nesting the -ENOENT check inside an IS_ERR() guard block.
>
> Fixes: 6a26f141bf62 ("media: i2c: mt9t112: Remove soc_camera dependencies")
> Signed-off-by: Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
> index a8e2a3cf3456..56b7c8910112 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9t112.c
> @@ -1079,10 +1079,12 @@ static int mt9t112_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, client, &mt9t112_subdev_ops);
>
> priv->clk = devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get(&client->dev, "extclk");
> - if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) == -ENOENT)
> - priv->clk = NULL;
> - else if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> - return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
> - "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) == -ENOENT)
You could test for !- -ENOENT and drop the else clause.
> + priv->clk = NULL;
> + else
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
> + "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
> + }
>
> priv->standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "standby",
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 10:59 Uday Khare
2026-07-20 11:34 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2026-07-20 11:48 ` [PATCH v2] media: i2c: mt9t112: fix incorrect PTR_ERR() call on non-error pointer Uday Khare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al4HvRWaRAMFPUrQ@kekkonen.localdomain \
--to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=udaykhare77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®