From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] workqueue: test WQ_UNBOUND explicitly in the hotplug loops
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:52:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-5-fd498d01d695@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-0-fd498d01d695@debian.org>
workqueue_online_cpu() and workqueue_offline_cpu() decide whether a
workqueue needs a pod affinity update by testing wq->unbound_attrs for
NULL, which is only meaningful because the attrs are allocated for
unbound workqueues alone.
Test the flag instead, so the attrs can later be allocated for every
workqueue.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 7b20d459d6442..b6458ee53852f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -6945,7 +6945,7 @@ int workqueue_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs = wq->unbound_attrs;
- if (attrs) {
+ if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
const struct wq_pod_type *pt = wqattrs_pod_type(attrs);
int tcpu;
@@ -6980,7 +6980,7 @@ int workqueue_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs = wq->unbound_attrs;
- if (attrs) {
+ if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
const struct wq_pod_type *pt = wqattrs_pod_type(attrs);
int tcpu;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/9] workqueue: base pwq pool release and nr_active on the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] workqueue: factor out get_percpu_pool() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] workqueue: factor out alloc_and_link_percpu_pwqs() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] workqueue: release pwq pools by pool type Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] workqueue: account nr_active by the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 21:41 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-11 10:15 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] workqueue: rename wq->unbound_attrs to wq->attrs Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] workqueue: allocate attrs for all workqueues Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] workqueue: rename alloc_unbound_pwq() to alloc_pwq() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] workqueue: skip the node_nr_active update for non-unbound workqueues Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] workqueue: base pwq pool release and nr_active on the backing pool Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-5-fd498d01d695@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®