mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>
Cc: lorenzo@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com,
	andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iio: humidity: hts221: report available values via read_avail()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 01:09:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810010943.014d8db1@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808090026.34187-2-adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>

On Sat,  8 Aug 2026 17:00:22 +0800
Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Replace the custom oversampling_ratio_available sysfs attributes with
> the standard IIO read_avail() callback. This lets the IIO core create
> and format *_available attributes and exposes the lists to
> in-kernel consumers.

Sashiko points out that there is an ABI change in here as oddly
the driver uses
in_humidity_oversampling_ratio_available rather than
in_humidityrelative_oversampling_ratio_available

Which makes this an ABI fix.  Therefore this should have a fixes
tag and be moved to the start of the set.  Please check that logic
though as maybe I'm missing something.

J
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_core.c | 106 +++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_core.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_core.c
> index bfeb0a60d3af..76a391f421f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_core.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> -#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> @@ -49,7 +48,7 @@ struct hts221_odr {
>  struct hts221_avg {
>  	u8 addr;
>  	u8 mask;
> -	u16 avg_avl[HTS221_AVG_DEPTH];
> +	int avg_avl[HTS221_AVG_DEPTH];
>  };
>  
>  static const struct hts221_odr hts221_odr_table[] = {
> @@ -58,6 +57,8 @@ static const struct hts221_odr hts221_odr_table[] = {
>  	{ 13, 0x03 },	/* 12.5Hz */
>  };
>  
> +static const int hts221_odr_avail[] = { 1, 7, 13 };
> +
>  static const struct hts221_avg hts221_avg_list[] = {
>  	{
>  		.addr = 0x10,
> @@ -97,7 +98,11 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec hts221_channels[] = {
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
> +		.info_mask_separate_available =
> +				BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
>  		.info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_all_available =
> +				BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),
>  		.scan_index = 0,
>  		.scan_type = {
>  			.sign = 's',
> @@ -113,7 +118,11 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec hts221_channels[] = {
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
>  				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
> +		.info_mask_separate_available =
> +				BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
>  		.info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),
> +		.info_mask_shared_by_all_available =
> +				BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ),
>  		.scan_index = 1,
>  		.scan_type = {
>  			.sign = 's',
> @@ -192,53 +201,35 @@ static int hts221_update_avg(struct hts221_hw *hw,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static ssize_t hts221_sysfs_sampling_freq(struct device *dev,
> -					  struct device_attribute *attr,
> -					  char *buf)
> -{
> -	int i;
> -	ssize_t len = 0;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hts221_odr_table); i++)
> -		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d ",
> -				 hts221_odr_table[i].hz);
> -	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> -
> -	return len;
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t
> -hts221_sysfs_rh_oversampling_avail(struct device *dev,
> -				   struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				   char *buf)
> -{
> -	const struct hts221_avg *avg = &hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_H];
> -	ssize_t len = 0;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(avg->avg_avl); i++)
> -		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d ",
> -				 avg->avg_avl[i]);
> -	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> -
> -	return len;
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t
> -hts221_sysfs_temp_oversampling_avail(struct device *dev,
> -				     struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				     char *buf)
> +static int hts221_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +			     struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> +			     const int **vals, int *type, int *length,
> +			     long mask)
>  {
> -	const struct hts221_avg *avg = &hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_T];
> -	ssize_t len = 0;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(avg->avg_avl); i++)
> -		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d ",
> -				 avg->avg_avl[i]);
> -	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> -
> -	return len;
> +	switch (mask) {
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> +		switch (chan->type) {
> +		case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> +			*vals = hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_H].avg_avl;
> +			*length = ARRAY_SIZE(hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_H].avg_avl);
> +			break;
> +		case IIO_TEMP:
> +			*vals = hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_T].avg_avl;
> +			*length = ARRAY_SIZE(hts221_avg_list[HTS221_SENSOR_T].avg_avl);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +		*type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> +		return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		*vals = hts221_odr_avail;
> +		*type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> +		*length = ARRAY_SIZE(hts221_odr_avail);
> +		return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  int hts221_set_enable(struct hts221_hw *hw, bool enable)
> @@ -521,27 +512,10 @@ static int hts221_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  	return hw->trig == trig ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> -static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_humidity_oversampling_ratio_available, S_IRUGO,
> -		       hts221_sysfs_rh_oversampling_avail, NULL, 0);
> -static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_temp_oversampling_ratio_available, S_IRUGO,
> -		       hts221_sysfs_temp_oversampling_avail, NULL, 0);
> -static IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL(hts221_sysfs_sampling_freq);
> -
> -static struct attribute *hts221_attributes[] = {
> -	&iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
> -	&iio_dev_attr_in_humidity_oversampling_ratio_available.dev_attr.attr,
> -	&iio_dev_attr_in_temp_oversampling_ratio_available.dev_attr.attr,
> -	NULL,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct attribute_group hts221_attribute_group = {
> -	.attrs = hts221_attributes,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct iio_info hts221_info = {
> -	.attrs = &hts221_attribute_group,
>  	.read_raw = hts221_read_raw,
>  	.write_raw = hts221_write_raw,
> +	.read_avail = hts221_read_avail,
>  	.validate_trigger = hts221_validate_trigger,
>  };
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-08  9:00 [PATCH 0/5] iio: humidity: hts221: update probe and logging implementations Adi Nata
2026-08-08  9:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] iio: humidity: hts221: report available values via read_avail() Adi Nata
2026-08-10  0:09   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-08-12  0:22     ` Adinata Tan
2026-08-12  5:04       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-12 11:40         ` Adinata Tan
2026-08-12  0:27     ` Adi
2026-08-08  9:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio: humidity: hts221: Add a blank line after variable declarations Adi Nata
2026-08-10  8:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-08  9:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] iio: humidity: hts221: Allow unknown whoami for DT fallback Adi Nata
2026-08-10  8:43   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-08  9:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio: humidity: hts221: use dev_err_probe() in probe paths Adi Nata
2026-08-10  8:45   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-12  0:31     ` Adi
2026-08-08  9:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio: humidity: hts221: fix division by zero in calibration parsing Adi Nata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810010943.014d8db1@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®