* [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
@ 2026-08-12 4:07 Hongfu Li
2026-08-14 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hongfu Li @ 2026-08-12 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, bvanassche; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, hongfu.li, Hongfu Li
From: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
deadline_next_request().
Remove these unused function parameters.
Signed-off-by: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
---
v2:
- Adjust code formatting.
- No functional changes.
---
block/mq-deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 824bfc17b2c6..5f643c0ce2a8 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static void dd_merged_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
/*
* move an entry to dispatch queue
*/
-static void
-deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
- struct request *rq)
+static void deadline_move_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+ struct request *rq)
{
/*
* take it off the sort and fifo list
@@ -269,9 +268,8 @@ static inline bool deadline_check_fifo(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
* For the specified data direction, return the next request to
* dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
*/
-static struct request *
-deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
- enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
+static struct request *deadline_fifo_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+ enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
{
if (list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir]))
return NULL;
@@ -283,9 +281,8 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
* For the specified data direction, return the next request to
* dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
*/
-static struct request *
-deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
- enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
+static struct request *deadline_next_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+ enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
{
return deadline_from_pos(per_prio, data_dir,
per_prio->latest_pos[data_dir]);
@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
/*
* batches are currently reads XOR writes
*/
- rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, dd->last_dir);
+ rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, dd->last_dir);
if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch) {
/* we have a next request and are still entitled to batch */
data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
@@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_READ])) {
BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&per_prio->sort_list[DD_READ]));
- if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
+ if (deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
(dd->starved++ >= dd->writes_starved))
goto dispatch_writes;
@@ -379,14 +376,14 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
/*
* we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir
*/
- next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
+ next_rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, data_dir);
if (deadline_check_fifo(per_prio, data_dir) || !next_rq) {
/*
* A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other
* direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests.
* Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time.
*/
- rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
+ rq = deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, data_dir);
} else {
/*
* The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in
@@ -409,7 +406,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
* rq is the selected appropriate request.
*/
dd->batching++;
- deadline_move_request(dd, per_prio, rq);
+ deadline_move_request(per_prio, rq);
return dd_start_request(dd, data_dir, rq);
}
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
2026-08-12 4:07 [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters Hongfu Li
@ 2026-08-14 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-14 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-08-14 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongfu Li; +Cc: axboe, bvanassche, linux-block, linux-kernel, Hongfu Li
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
2026-08-12 4:07 [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters Hongfu Li
2026-08-14 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-08-14 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-14 17:21 ` Tao Cui
2026-08-16 0:01 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2026-08-14 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongfu Li, axboe; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, Hongfu Li
On 8/11/26 9:07 PM, Hongfu Li wrote:
> Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
> left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
>
> Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
> write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
> deadline_next_request().
>
> Remove these unused function parameters.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
2026-08-12 4:07 [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters Hongfu Li
2026-08-14 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-14 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2026-08-14 17:21 ` Tao Cui
2026-08-16 0:01 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tao Cui @ 2026-08-14 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongfu Li, axboe, bvanassche
Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, hongfu.li, Hongfu Li
于 2026年8月12日 GMT+08:00 12:07:29,Hongfu Li <hongfu.li@linux.dev> 写道:
>From: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
>
>Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
>left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
>
>Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
>write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
>deadline_next_request().
>
>Remove these unused function parameters.
>
>Signed-off-by: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
>---
>v2:
>- Adjust code formatting.
>- No functional changes.
>---
> block/mq-deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
>index 824bfc17b2c6..5f643c0ce2a8 100644
>--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
>+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
>@@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static void dd_merged_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
> /*
> * move an entry to dispatch queue
> */
>-static void
>-deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>- struct request *rq)
>+static void deadline_move_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+ struct request *rq)
> {
> /*
> * take it off the sort and fifo list
>@@ -269,9 +268,8 @@ static inline bool deadline_check_fifo(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
> * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
> * dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
> */
>-static struct request *
>-deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>- enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
>+static struct request *deadline_fifo_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+ enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
> {
> if (list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir]))
> return NULL;
>@@ -283,9 +281,8 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
> * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
> * dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
> */
>-static struct request *
>-deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>- enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
>+static struct request *deadline_next_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+ enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
> {
> return deadline_from_pos(per_prio, data_dir,
> per_prio->latest_pos[data_dir]);
>@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> /*
> * batches are currently reads XOR writes
> */
>- rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, dd->last_dir);
>+ rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, dd->last_dir);
> if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch) {
> /* we have a next request and are still entitled to batch */
> data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
>@@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_READ])) {
> BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&per_prio->sort_list[DD_READ]));
>
>- if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
>+ if (deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
> (dd->starved++ >= dd->writes_starved))
> goto dispatch_writes;
>
>@@ -379,14 +376,14 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> /*
> * we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir
> */
>- next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
>+ next_rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, data_dir);
> if (deadline_check_fifo(per_prio, data_dir) || !next_rq) {
> /*
> * A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other
> * direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests.
> * Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time.
> */
>- rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
>+ rq = deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, data_dir);
> } else {
> /*
> * The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in
>@@ -409,7 +406,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> * rq is the selected appropriate request.
> */
> dd->batching++;
>- deadline_move_request(dd, per_prio, rq);
>+ deadline_move_request(per_prio, rq);
> return dd_start_request(dd, data_dir, rq);
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
2026-08-12 4:07 [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters Hongfu Li
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-14 17:21 ` Tao Cui
@ 2026-08-16 0:01 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2026-08-16 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche, Hongfu Li; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, Hongfu Li
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:07:29 +0800, Hongfu Li wrote:
> Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
> left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
>
> Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
> write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
> deadline_next_request().
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
commit: 7fab47863aa2a1680415bd73b7e0a4212a2ebf0e
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-16 0:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-12 4:07 [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters Hongfu Li
2026-08-14 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-14 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-14 17:21 ` Tao Cui
2026-08-16 0:01 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®