* [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation @ 2026-08-26 7:00 Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sairaj Kodilkar, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, Uros Bizjak, kvm, linux-kernel, x86 Cc: vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit This series adds 128-bit compare-exchange support needed for KVM to emulate guest cmpxchg16b instructions. The AMD IOMMU driver updates 256-bit device table entries with two 128-bit cmpxchg operations. For hardware-accelerated vIOMMU, QEMU traps those DTE accesses to install nested page tables [1]. KVM must emulate guest cmpxchg16b on the trapped MMIO regions; without that, DTE access emulation fails. Patch 1: extends the x86 user CMPXCHG helpers with __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm() (cmpxchg16b on x86-64), wired into unsafe_try_cmpxchg_user(). Patch 2: extends KVM CMPXCHG8B emulation to 16-byte operands (REX.W=1) and uses the new helper for atomic 16-byte compare-exchange on guest RAM via emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(). You can find the KUT to test this series at [2]. [1] https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu-iommu/blob/wip/for_iommufd_hw_queue-v8_amd_viommu_20260106/hw/i386/amd_viommu.c#L517 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260706062153.346-1-sarunkod@amd.com/T/#u Changes since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260706063035.1139-1-sarunkod@amd.com/ Patch 1: Trigger build failure if __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm is called on 32 bit machines [Sean] Sairaj Kodilkar (2): x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 6 ++++ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++++- 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) base-commit: 45c13f3f9e3bb15fd89ff2864c6f627a3b4b4229 -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands 2026-08-26 7:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 7:00 ` Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 12:30 ` Dave Hansen 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sairaj Kodilkar, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, Uros Bizjak, kvm, linux-kernel, x86 Cc: vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit Extend the existing user CMPXCHG helpers to support 16-byte operands on x86-64, using LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b". This mirrors the existing __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm() / cmpxchg8b path provided for 32-bit kernels, where KVM needs an atomic compare-exchange wider than the generic cmpxchg helper can provide. On 32-bit kernels, stub the helper to always return failure because cmpxchg16b requires 64-bit GPRs and is not available. KVM uses this to atomically emulate guest cmpxchg16b on guest RAM mapped via userspace addresses. Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 3a0dd3c2b233..39bcf327664e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -407,6 +407,25 @@ do { \ if (unlikely(!success)) \ *_old = __old; \ likely(success); }) +#else // !CONFIG_X86_32 +#define __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm(_ptr, _pold, _new, label) ({ \ + bool success; \ + __typeof__(_ptr) _old = (__typeof__(_ptr))(_pold); \ + __typeof__(*(_ptr)) __old = *_old; \ + __typeof__(*(_ptr)) __new = (_new); \ + asm_goto_output("\n" \ + "1: " LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b %[ptr]\n" \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, %l[label]) \ + : "=@ccz" (success), \ + "+A" (__old), \ + [ptr] "+m" (*_ptr) \ + : "b" ((u64)__new), \ + "c" ((u64)((u128)__new >> 64)) \ + : "memory" \ + : label); \ + if (unlikely(!success)) \ + *_old = __old; \ + likely(success); }) #endif // CONFIG_X86_32 #else // !CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_TIED_OUTPUT #define __try_cmpxchg_user_asm(itype, ltype, _ptr, _pold, _new, label) ({ \ @@ -463,6 +482,30 @@ do { \ if (unlikely(!__result)) \ *_old = __old; \ likely(__result); }) +#else //!CONFIG_X86_32 +#define __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm(_ptr, _pold, _new, label) ({ \ + int __result; \ + __typeof__(_ptr) _old = (__typeof__(_ptr))(_pold); \ + __typeof__(*(_ptr)) __old = *_old; \ + __typeof__(*(_ptr)) __new = (_new); \ + asm volatile("\n" \ + "1: " LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b %[ptr]\n" \ + "mov $0, %[result]\n\t" \ + "setz %b[result]\n" \ + "2:\n" \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE_REG(1b, 2b, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, \ + %[result]) \ + : [result] "=q" (__result), \ + "+A" (__old), \ + [ptr] "+m" (*_ptr) \ + : "b" ((u64)__new), \ + "c" ((u64)((u128)__new >> 64)) \ + : "memory", "cc"); \ + if (unlikely(__result < 0)) \ + goto label; \ + if (unlikely(!__result)) \ + *_old = __old; \ + likely(__result); }) #endif // CONFIG_X86_32 #endif // CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_TIED_OUTPUT @@ -551,11 +594,18 @@ do { \ extern void __try_cmpxchg_user_wrong_size(void); -#ifndef CONFIG_X86_32 +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 +/* Always fail on 32 bit arch as it do not support 128 cmpxchg (i.e. cmpxchg16b + * instruction). + */ +#define __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm(_ptr, _pold, _new, label) ({ BUILD_BUG_ON(1); 0; }) +#else #define __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm(_ptr, _oldp, _nval, _label) \ __try_cmpxchg_user_asm("q", "r", (_ptr), (_oldp), (_nval), _label) + #endif + /* * Force the pointer to u<size> to match the size expected by the asm helper. * clang/LLVM compiles all cases and only discards the unused paths after @@ -580,6 +630,10 @@ extern void __try_cmpxchg_user_wrong_size(void); case 8: __ret = __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm((__force u64 *)(_ptr), (_oldp),\ (_nval), _label); \ break; \ + case 16: \ + __ret = __try_cmpxchg128_user_asm((__force u128 *)(_ptr), \ + (_oldp), (_nval), _label); \ + break; \ default: __try_cmpxchg_user_wrong_size(); \ } \ __ret; }) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 12:30 ` Dave Hansen 2026-08-26 13:19 ` Uros Bizjak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dave Hansen @ 2026-08-26 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sairaj Kodilkar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, Uros Bizjak, kvm, linux-kernel, x86 Cc: vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit On 8/26/26 00:00, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: > Extend the existing user CMPXCHG helpers to support 16-byte operands on > x86-64, using LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b". This mirrors the existing > __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm() / cmpxchg8b path provided for 32-bit kernels, > where KVM needs an atomic compare-exchange wider than the generic > cmpxchg helper can provide. Please take a good look at the Sashiko review: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826070004.8100-2-sarunkod%40amd.com It looks like the "A" constraint isn't one that you can cleanly mirror from cmpxchg8b => cmpxchg16b. Uros, any chance you can give these a good once-over? This seems to be just the kind of thing you've been fixing up lately. It would be nice to get them right the first time. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands 2026-08-26 12:30 ` Dave Hansen @ 2026-08-26 13:19 ` Uros Bizjak 2026-08-26 13:28 ` Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-27 9:01 ` David Laight 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Uros Bizjak @ 2026-08-26 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Hansen Cc: Sairaj Kodilkar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, kvm, linux-kernel, x86, vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 2:30 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote: > > On 8/26/26 00:00, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: > > Extend the existing user CMPXCHG helpers to support 16-byte operands on > > x86-64, using LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b". This mirrors the existing > > __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm() / cmpxchg8b path provided for 32-bit kernels, > > where KVM needs an atomic compare-exchange wider than the generic > > cmpxchg helper can provide. > > Please take a good look at the Sashiko review: > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826070004.8100-2-sarunkod%40amd.com > > It looks like the "A" constraint isn't one that you can cleanly mirror > from cmpxchg8b => cmpxchg16b. Actually, "+A" will work for 64bit targets, as long as the variable is 128-bit. The comment in asm.h applies to 64-bit values, where on 32-bit targets they fit in eax *and* edx, while on 64-bit targets, the 64-bit values fit into rax *or* rdx. This is documented in GCC documentation: ‘A’ The ‘a’ and ‘d’ registers. This class is used for instructions that return double word results in the ‘ax:dx’ register pair. Single word values will be allocated either in ‘ax’ or ‘dx’. And can be confirmed with e.g.: __int128 val; void foo (void) { __int128 _v = val; asm volatile ("" : "+A" (_v)); val = _v; } which will fail compilation with -ffixed-rax or -ffixed-rdx. That said, the approach with union of two 64-bit halves can lead to slightly better code, because the compiler splits the value earlier in the compilation pipeline. > Uros, any chance you can give these a good once-over? This seems to be > just the kind of thing you've been fixing up lately. It would be nice to > get them right the first time. Based on the above explanation, these *can* be copied from 32-bit asm patterns. Even "q" constraint will include all integer registers on 64-bit targets. Uros. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands 2026-08-26 13:19 ` Uros Bizjak @ 2026-08-26 13:28 ` Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-27 9:01 ` David Laight 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Uros Bizjak, Dave Hansen Cc: sarunkod, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, kvm, linux-kernel, x86, vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit On 8/26/2026 6:49 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > [You don't often get email from ubizjak@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 2:30 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote: >> >> On 8/26/26 00:00, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: >>> Extend the existing user CMPXCHG helpers to support 16-byte operands on >>> x86-64, using LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b". This mirrors the existing >>> __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm() / cmpxchg8b path provided for 32-bit kernels, >>> where KVM needs an atomic compare-exchange wider than the generic >>> cmpxchg helper can provide. >> >> Please take a good look at the Sashiko review: >> >> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826070004.8100-2-sarunkod%40amd.com >> >> It looks like the "A" constraint isn't one that you can cleanly mirror >> from cmpxchg8b => cmpxchg16b. > > Actually, "+A" will work for 64bit targets, as long as the variable is > 128-bit. The comment in asm.h applies to 64-bit values, where on > 32-bit targets they fit in eax *and* edx, while on 64-bit targets, the > 64-bit values fit into rax *or* rdx. > > This is documented in GCC documentation: > > ‘A’ > The ‘a’ and ‘d’ registers. This class is used for > instructions that return double word results in the ‘ax:dx’ > register pair. Single word values will be allocated either in > ‘ax’ or ‘dx’. > > And can be confirmed with e.g.: > > __int128 val; > > void foo (void) > { > __int128 _v = val; > asm volatile ("" : "+A" (_v)); > val = _v; > } > > which will fail compilation with -ffixed-rax or -ffixed-rdx. > > That said, the approach with union of two 64-bit halves can lead to > slightly better code, because the compiler splits the value earlier in > the compilation pipeline. > >> Uros, any chance you can give these a good once-over? This seems to be >> just the kind of thing you've been fixing up lately. It would be nice to >> get them right the first time. > > Based on the above explanation, these *can* be copied from 32-bit asm > patterns. Even "q" constraint will include all integer registers on > 64-bit targets. Yep, this is what I was trying to say in my reply to sashiko. Basically +A can be safely used for 64 bit values on 32 bit machines and 128 bit values on 64 bit machines. Also if you prefer split one, I can do that as well. Sairaj > > Uros. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands 2026-08-26 13:19 ` Uros Bizjak 2026-08-26 13:28 ` Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-27 9:01 ` David Laight 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: David Laight @ 2026-08-27 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Uros Bizjak Cc: Dave Hansen, Sairaj Kodilkar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, kvm, linux-kernel, x86, vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:19:57 +0200 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 2:30 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/26/26 00:00, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: > > > Extend the existing user CMPXCHG helpers to support 16-byte operands on > > > x86-64, using LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg16b". This mirrors the existing > > > __try_cmpxchg64_user_asm() / cmpxchg8b path provided for 32-bit kernels, > > > where KVM needs an atomic compare-exchange wider than the generic > > > cmpxchg helper can provide. > > > > Please take a good look at the Sashiko review: > > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826070004.8100-2-sarunkod%40amd.com > > > > It looks like the "A" constraint isn't one that you can cleanly mirror > > from cmpxchg8b => cmpxchg16b. > > Actually, "+A" will work for 64bit targets, as long as the variable is > 128-bit. The comment in asm.h applies to 64-bit values, where on > 32-bit targets they fit in eax *and* edx, while on 64-bit targets, the > 64-bit values fit into rax *or* rdx. > ... > > That said, the approach with union of two 64-bit halves can lead to > slightly better code, because the compiler splits the value earlier in > the compilation pipeline. I think I agree... From experiments I did with 64bit values on 32bit it is more the case that the value never gets assigned to a 64bit (on 32bit) 'virtual' register. If that ever happens all the operations are initially done with the 'wide' register and then later split (rather than being generated as a pair of 32bit ops). This causes excessive register pressure and even spilling of constant zero values to stack. You do seem to 'get away' with returning hi << 32 | lo. I'd guess the same happens for 128bit values on 64bit. (This is gcc, clang does a lot better.) David > > > Uros, any chance you can give these a good once-over? This seems to be > > just the kind of thing you've been fixing up lately. It would be nice to > > get them right the first time. > > Based on the above explanation, these *can* be copied from 32-bit asm > patterns. Even "q" constraint will include all integer registers on > 64-bit targets. > > Uros. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation 2026-08-26 7:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 7:00 ` Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 12:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Mathieu Desnoyers, Paolo Bonzini, Sairaj Kodilkar, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, Uros Bizjak, kvm, linux-kernel, x86 Cc: vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit AMD and Intel both provides support for 128 bit cmpxchg operands using cmpxchg8b/cmpxchg16b instructions (opcode 0FC7). However, kvm does not support emulating cmpxchg16b (i.e when destination memory is 128 bit and REX.W = 1) which causes emulation failure when QEMU guest performs a cmpxchg16b on a memory region setup as a IO. This failure is seen on the AMD IOMMU driver which writes 256-bit device table entries with two 128-bit cmpxchg operations. For guests using hardware-accelerated vIOMMU, QEMU traps device table accesses to set up nested page tables (see [1]). Without 128-bit cmpxchg emulation, KVM cannot handle these traps and DTE access emulation fails. Hence extend cmpxchg8b to perform cmpxchg16b when the destination memory is 128 bit. [1] https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu-iommu/blob/wip/for_iommufd_hw_queue-v8_amd_viommu_20260106/hw/i386/amd_viommu.c#L517 Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 6 +++++ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c index c1b21282187f..f38c4f1a99c3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c @@ -2184,24 +2184,36 @@ static int em_call_near_abs(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) return rc; } +#define em_cmpxchg8b_16b(__c, rbits, mbits)\ +do { \ + u##mbits old = __c->dst.orig_val##mbits; \ + \ + BUILD_BUG_ON(rbits * 2 != mbits); \ + \ + if (((u##rbits) (old >> 0) != (u##rbits) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX)) || \ + ((u##rbits) (old >> rbits) != (u##rbits) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX))) { \ + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u##rbits) (old >> 0); \ + *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = (u##rbits) (old >> rbits); \ + ctxt->eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_ZF; \ + } else { \ + ctxt->dst.val##mbits = ((u##mbits)reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) << rbits) | \ + (u##rbits) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX); \ + \ + ctxt->eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; \ + } \ +} while(0) + static int em_cmpxchg8b(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) { - u64 old = ctxt->dst.orig_val64; - - if (ctxt->dst.bytes == 16) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(8 + !!(ctxt->rex_bits & REX_W) * 8 != ctxt->dst.bytes)) return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; - if (((u32) (old >> 0) != (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX)) || - ((u32) (old >> 32) != (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX))) { - *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = (u32) (old >> 0); - *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = (u32) (old >> 32); - ctxt->eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_ZF; - } else { - ctxt->dst.val64 = ((u64)reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) << 32) | - (u32) reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX); - - ctxt->eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; - } + if (!(ctxt->rex_bits & REX_W)) + em_cmpxchg8b_16b(ctxt, 32, 64); +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + else + em_cmpxchg8b_16b(ctxt, 64, 128); +#endif return X86EMUL_CONTINUE; } @@ -5414,8 +5426,14 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, bool check_intercepts) goto done; } } - /* Copy full 64-bit value for CMPXCHG8B. */ - ctxt->dst.orig_val64 = ctxt->dst.val64; + /* Copy full 64/128-bit value for CMPXCHG8B. */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + if (ctxt->dst.bytes == 16) + ctxt->dst.orig_val128 = ctxt->dst.val128; + else +#endif + ctxt->dst.orig_val64 = ctxt->dst.val64; special_insn: diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h index 3e375af15c03..89911845233d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ struct operand { union { unsigned long orig_val; u64 orig_val64; +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + u128 orig_val128; +#endif }; union { unsigned long *reg; @@ -276,6 +279,9 @@ struct operand { union { unsigned long val; u64 val64; +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + u128 val128; +#endif char valptr[sizeof(avx256_t)]; sse128_t vec_val; avx256_t vec_val2; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 79468ddfe473..60be16f05d79 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -5271,7 +5271,7 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int r; /* guests cmpxchg8b have to be emulated atomically */ - if (bytes > 8 || (bytes & (bytes - 1))) + if (bytes > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long) || (bytes & (bytes - 1))) goto emul_write; gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, addr, NULL); @@ -5311,6 +5311,11 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, case 8: r = emulator_try_cmpxchg_user(u64, hva, old, new); break; +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + case 16: + r = emulator_try_cmpxchg_user(u128, hva, old, new); + break; +#endif default: BUG(); } -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar @ 2026-08-26 12:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2026-08-26 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sairaj Kodilkar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Ingo Molnar, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Thomas Gleixner, Uros Bizjak, kvm, linux-kernel, x86 Cc: vasant.hegde, suravee.suthikulpanit On 2026-08-26 03:00, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: > AMD and Intel both provides support for 128 bit cmpxchg operands using > cmpxchg8b/cmpxchg16b instructions (opcode 0FC7). However, kvm does not > support emulating cmpxchg16b (i.e when destination memory is 128 bit and > REX.W = 1) which causes emulation failure when QEMU guest performs a > cmpxchg16b on a memory region setup as a IO. > > This failure is seen on the AMD IOMMU driver which writes 256-bit device > table entries with two 128-bit cmpxchg operations. For guests using > hardware-accelerated vIOMMU, QEMU traps device table accesses to set up > nested page tables (see [1]). Without 128-bit cmpxchg emulation, KVM > cannot handle these traps and DTE access emulation fails. > > Hence extend cmpxchg8b to perform cmpxchg16b when the destination memory > is 128 bit. > > [1] https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu-iommu/blob/wip/for_iommufd_hw_queue-v8_amd_viommu_20260106/hw/i386/amd_viommu.c#L517 > You may want to test for the X86_FEATURE_CX16 cpu feature and only enable this on 64-bit x86 CPUs implementing this instruction. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-27 9:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-08-26 7:00 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/uaccess: Extend CMPXCHG user helpers to 128-bit operands Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 12:30 ` Dave Hansen 2026-08-26 13:19 ` Uros Bizjak 2026-08-26 13:28 ` Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-27 9:01 ` David Laight 2026-08-26 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Add support for cmpxchg16b emulation Sairaj Kodilkar 2026-08-26 12:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®