* [PATCH] locking/local_lock: remove unused __spinlock_nested_bh_init()
@ 2026-08-17 13:03 Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-27 11:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhan Xusheng @ 2026-08-17 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
Cc: Will Deacon, Boqun Feng, Waiman Long, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
zhanxusheng, linux-kernel, Zhan Xusheng
From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Added by commit c5bcab755822 ("locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH
locking infrastructure.") and unused since: there is no public wrapper for
it in local_lock.h and no caller, and 'spinlock_nested_bh' appears nowhere
else in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
---
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 234be7f12c15..4cf947ffd02a 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -94,17 +94,6 @@ do { \
__local_lock_init((local_lock_t *)lock); \
} while (0)
-#define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock) \
-do { \
- static struct lock_class_key __key; \
- \
- debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));\
- lockdep_init_map_type(&(lock)->dep_map, #lock, &__key, \
- 0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
- LD_LOCK_NORMAL); \
- local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
-} while (0)
-
#define __local_lock_acquire(lock) \
do { \
local_trylock_t *__tl; \
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] locking/local_lock: remove unused __spinlock_nested_bh_init()
2026-08-17 13:03 [PATCH] locking/local_lock: remove unused __spinlock_nested_bh_init() Zhan Xusheng
@ 2026-08-27 11:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-08-27 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Will Deacon, Boqun Feng,
Waiman Long, zhanxusheng, linux-kernel
On 2026-08-17 21:03:54 [+0800], Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
>
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
>
> Added by commit c5bcab755822 ("locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH
> locking infrastructure.") and unused since: there is no public wrapper for
> it in local_lock.h and no caller, and 'spinlock_nested_bh' appears nowhere
> else in the tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> @@ -94,17 +94,6 @@ do { \
> __local_lock_init((local_lock_t *)lock); \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock) \
> -do { \
> - static struct lock_class_key __key; \
> - \
> - debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));\
> - lockdep_init_map_type(&(lock)->dep_map, #lock, &__key, \
> - 0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
> - LD_LOCK_NORMAL); \
> - local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
> -} while (0)
> -
This must have been something in-between because it uses LD_LOCK_NORMAL
and it should have been LD_LOCK_PERCPU if intended for this.
> #define __local_lock_acquire(lock) \
> do { \
> local_trylock_t *__tl; \
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-27 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-17 13:03 [PATCH] locking/local_lock: remove unused __spinlock_nested_bh_init() Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-27 11:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®