From: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
To: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, lianux.mm@gmail.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, chenridong@xiaomi.com, david@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, kasong@tencent.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org,
lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, stevensd@chromium.org,
wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
zhangbo56@xiaomi.com, Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/mglru: batch move folios to the second-oldest gen's LRU
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:45:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830074531.79967-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827234704.63163-8-baohua@kernel.org>
On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 07:47:04 +0800 "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org> wrote:
> Detect folios that need to move from the oldest generation to
> the second-oldest generation, and batch-move them together.
> This can significantly reduce the sys time of inc_min_seq(),
> especially when the other type is significantly behind the
> preferred type.
>
> Assisted-by: gemini:gemini-3.6-flash
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
> Tested-by: Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 17524e96fe64..2b6f3f05ce60 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3931,6 +3931,19 @@ static void clear_mm_walk(void)
> kfree(walk);
> }
>
> +static inline void flush_lru_batch(struct list_head *head, struct list_head **batch_end,
> + struct list_head *dst)
> +{
> + LIST_HEAD(movable);
> +
> + if (!*batch_end)
> + return;
> +
> + list_cut_position(&movable, head, *batch_end);
> + list_splice_tail_init(&movable, dst);
> + *batch_end = NULL;
> +}
This is safe because `batch_end` always marks a contiguous prefix of `head`:
the loop walks from head to tail and flushes the prefix before moving any folio
that was already promoted by aging.
> +
> static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int swappiness)
> {
> int zone;
> @@ -3953,8 +3966,10 @@ static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int swappiness)
> lru_gen_is_active(lruvec, target_gen));
> /* prevent cold/hot inversion if the type is evictable */
> for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> + struct list_head *target_list = &lrugen->folios[target_gen][type][zone];
> struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[old_gen][type][zone];
> struct list_head *pos = head->next;
> + struct list_head *batch_end = NULL;
> long delta = 0;
>
> while (pos != head) {
> @@ -3974,7 +3989,7 @@ static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int swappiness)
> new_gen = __folio_inc_gen(folio, old_gen, &gen_increased);
> if (gen_increased) {
> delta += nr_pages;
> - list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[new_gen][type][zone]);
> + batch_end = &folio->lru;
>
> /* don't count the workingset being lazily promoted */
> if (refs + workingset != BIT(LRU_REFS_WIDTH) + 1) {
> @@ -3984,11 +3999,14 @@ static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int swappiness)
> lrugen->protected[hist][type][tier] + nr_pages);
> }
> } else {
> + flush_lru_batch(head, &batch_end, target_list);
> list_move(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[new_gen][type][zone]);
> }
> if (!--remaining)
> break;
> }
> + flush_lru_batch(head, &batch_end, target_list);
The flush in the `else` keeps every already-promoted folio ahead of the
normal old-to-target batch. This final flush also covers the batch-limit exit
before the counters are updated and the lock can be dropped.
> +
> WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[old_gen][type][zone],
> lrugen->nr_pages[old_gen][type][zone] - delta);
> WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[target_gen][type][zone],
> --
> 2.34.1
The moved list entries and `delta` therefore cover the same folios, while the
relative order of each normal-folio run is preserved. Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 23:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm/mglru: speed up inc_min_seq() and fix cold/hot inversions Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-27 23:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/mglru: separate folio generation update from LRU accounting Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 7:26 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->nr_pages in inc_min_seq() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 3:58 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-08-30 4:26 ` Barry Song
2026-08-30 4:47 ` KunWu Chan
2026-08-30 7:01 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/mglru: enhance cold/hot inversion handling " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 2:43 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-30 4:28 ` Barry Song
2026-08-30 7:02 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/mglru: exclude folios promoted by aging from protected " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 6:13 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-30 7:03 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/mglru: make LRU folio prefetch helper an inline function Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 7:43 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/mglru: move folios from oldest gen to second-oldest gen from head to tail Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-30 7:44 ` Lian Wang
2026-08-27 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/mglru: batch move folios to the second-oldest gen's LRU Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-28 3:29 ` Barry Song
2026-08-30 7:45 ` Lian Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830074531.79967-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--to=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®