mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: Use asm-generic/timex.h over the host architecture one
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 08:52:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830155212.97975-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819-uml-timex-fix-v1-1-f690b514fc9f@linutronix.de>

On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:24:21 +0200 Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> wrote:

> The removal of the architecture-specific asm/timex.h was meant to fall
> back to asm-generic/timex.h. However on UML, the host architecture
> headers are earlier on the include path and therefore asm/timex.h from
> the host architecture is used.
> On x86 that header in turn requires the generation of cpufeaturemasks.h,
> which is not set up for UML and the build fails.
> 
> In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:9,
>                  from ../arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6,
>                  from ../include/linux/timex.h:67,
>                  from ../include/linux/time32.h:13,
>                  from ../include/linux/time.h:60,
>                  from ../include/linux/jiffies.h:10,
>                  from ../include/linux/ktime.h:25,
>                  from ../include/linux/timer.h:6,
>                  from ../include/linux/uprobes.h:18,
>                  from ../include/linux/mm_types.h:16,
>                  from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
>                  from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
>                  from ../include/linux/slab.h:17,
>                  from ../include/linux/crypto.h:18,
>                  from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:6:
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h: In function ‘get_cycles’:
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>    52 |         (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
>       |                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
>    79 |         if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:115:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_static_cpu_has’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   115 |                 _static_cpu_has(bit)                            \
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:72: note: in expansion of macro ‘_static_cpu_has’
>    52 |         (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
>       |                                                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
>    79 |         if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:115:17: note: ‘_static_cpu_has’ is a function-like macro and might be used incorrectly
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:72: note: in expansion of macro ‘_static_cpu_has’
>    52 |         (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
>       |                                                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
>    79 |         if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The x86-specific timex.h also doesn't make sense on UML in general.
> 
> Reintroduce the UML-specific asm/timex.h and add a comment to document
> its necessity.

I got the same issue, and confirmed this patch fixes it on my setup.  Thank you
for sharing this patch.

> 
> Fixes: 3ed403bbc967 ("treewide: Remove CLOCK_TICK_RATE")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>

Tested-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19  7:24 Thomas Weißschuh
2026-08-21  8:22 ` David Gow
2026-08-25  1:53 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Weißschuh
2026-08-30 15:52 ` SJ Park [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260830155212.97975-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®