From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: Use asm-generic/timex.h over the host architecture one
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 08:52:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830155212.97975-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819-uml-timex-fix-v1-1-f690b514fc9f@linutronix.de>
On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:24:21 +0200 Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The removal of the architecture-specific asm/timex.h was meant to fall
> back to asm-generic/timex.h. However on UML, the host architecture
> headers are earlier on the include path and therefore asm/timex.h from
> the host architecture is used.
> On x86 that header in turn requires the generation of cpufeaturemasks.h,
> which is not set up for UML and the build fails.
>
> In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:9,
> from ../arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6,
> from ../include/linux/timex.h:67,
> from ../include/linux/time32.h:13,
> from ../include/linux/time.h:60,
> from ../include/linux/jiffies.h:10,
> from ../include/linux/ktime.h:25,
> from ../include/linux/timer.h:6,
> from ../include/linux/uprobes.h:18,
> from ../include/linux/mm_types.h:16,
> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> from ../include/linux/slab.h:17,
> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:18,
> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:6:
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h: In function ‘get_cycles’:
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 52 | (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
> 79 | if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:115:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_static_cpu_has’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 115 | _static_cpu_has(bit) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:72: note: in expansion of macro ‘_static_cpu_has’
> 52 | (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
> 79 | if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:115:17: note: ‘_static_cpu_has’ is a function-like macro and might be used incorrectly
> arch/um/include/asm/cpufeature.h:52:72: note: in expansion of macro ‘_static_cpu_has’
> 52 | (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : _static_cpu_has(bit))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:79:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_feature_enabled’
> 79 | if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The x86-specific timex.h also doesn't make sense on UML in general.
>
> Reintroduce the UML-specific asm/timex.h and add a comment to document
> its necessity.
I got the same issue, and confirmed this patch fixes it on my setup. Thank you
for sharing this patch.
>
> Fixes: 3ed403bbc967 ("treewide: Remove CLOCK_TICK_RATE")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 7:24 Thomas Weißschuh
2026-08-21 8:22 ` David Gow
2026-08-25 1:53 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Weißschuh
2026-08-30 15:52 ` SJ Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830155212.97975-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®