mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	smostafa@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, praan@google.com, skhawaja@google.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommupt: Drop pagealloc references during domain deinit
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:16:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831061623.2164384-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827161828.GA3769797@ziepe.ca>

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 01:18:28PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> It is not misusing iommupt, but it is definitely misusing any iommu
> API built on top of it. How did you trigger this?

The kunit suite, nothing else.  test_pgsize_boundary() maps 128K at a
hard-coded OA and never unmaps it, so with iommu.debug_pagealloc=1 those
32 pages stay counted after pt_iommu_deinit() and every later allocation
or free of one of them WARNs.  The out-of-tree module in the cover letter
was something I wrote to confirm the mechanism, not a real driver.

The only non-test path I found that frees a populated domain is
iommu_setup_default_domain(), which releases the old domain with its
IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT mappings still installed.  I have not seen that WARN,
presumably because those pages do not come from the page allocator, so it
is not evidence of a bug and I am not proposing to change it.

> If this is the only trigger, then it is different testing things
> interacting badly and I don't think it should be fixed like this.
>
> Probably have the kunits directly unmap as they were being lazy

Agreed, and my "not driver misuse" framing was wrong: the iommupt deinit
contract says nothing about unmapping, but the iommu API above it does.
Dropping this series.

You were right about the tests: adding a count_valids() == 0 check to
pt_kunit_iommu_exit() without touching anything else fails exactly
test_increase_level(), test_pgsize_boundary() and test_mixed(); the other
cases already unmap.  I will send that as a single patch.

Thanks,
Yuanhe

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27 14:58 [PATCH 0/2] iommu: Drop IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC refs on iommupt domain teardown Yuanhe Shu
2026-08-27 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Add __iommu_debug_unmap_phys() to drop refs by physical address Yuanhe Shu
2026-08-27 16:13   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-08-27 16:17     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-08-27 16:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-31  6:21     ` Yuanhe Shu
2026-08-27 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommupt: Drop pagealloc references during domain deinit Yuanhe Shu
2026-08-27 16:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-31  6:16     ` Yuanhe Shu [this message]
2026-08-27 16:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] iommu: Drop IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC refs on iommupt domain teardown Mostafa Saleh
2026-08-31  6:23   ` Yuanhe Shu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831061623.2164384-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®