mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of metadata blocks
Date: Tue,  1 Sep 2026 14:32:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901063301.984933-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

The ocfs2 metadata validators trust the on-disk suballoc slot and bit
without checking them against the slot range of the mounted filesystem
and the capacity of the block group bitmap.  A corrupted image can
carry OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or another out-of-range slot, or a suballoc
bit beyond the bitmap, and once the corresponding inode, extent block,
xattr block, dir index root or refcount block gets freed, the bad
value goes straight into ocfs2_get_system_file_inode() or
_ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits() and hits a BUG_ON() or runs off the end of
local_system_inodes[].

This series rejects such values at read time in the existing
validators, so a corrupted filesystem fails with -EROFS and remounts
read-only instead of crashing:

  patch 1 restricts dinodes with OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT to system inodes,
        completing fe7a283b3916 ("ocfs2: add suballoc slot check in
        ocfs2_validate_inode_block()"), and turns the "system file
        state is ambiguous" BUG_ON() in ocfs2_read_locked_inode() into
        an ocfs2_error();
  patch 2 rejects oversized suballoc bits in dinodes;
  patch 3 validates the suballoc slot and bit of xattr and dir index
        blocks;
  patch 4 validates the suballoc slot and bit of extent and refcount
        blocks.

The checks only enforce what the kernel and mkfs.ocfs2 already write:
a valid slot from meta_ac->ac_alloc_slot and a bit within the block
group bitmap, with system inodes carrying OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT plus
OCFS2_SYSTEM_FL and extent blocks using slot 0.  Nothing changes for
healthy filesystems.

Each new check was exercised under QEMU by corrupting the field in
question with an out-of-range value; with the series applied the
access fails with -EROFS and the filesystem remounts read-only instead
of hitting the BUG_ON().

Changes since v1:
  - Patch 1 also turns the system-file-state BUG_ON() in
    ocfs2_read_locked_inode() into ocfs2_error().  i_flags is on-disk
    data, so a crafted dinode with OCFS2_SYSTEM_FL passes the slot
    check and still hit that BUG() on a plain lookup.
  - Patches 2-4 now bound the suballoc bit against the block group
    bitmap capacity (block size minus the group descriptor header)
    instead of the raw block size, using a new
    ocfs2_suballoc_bits_per_block() helper.
  - Patch 3 also validates xb_suballoc_bit and dr_suballoc_bit.
  - Patch 4 also validates h_suballoc_bit, and adds rf_suballoc_slot
    and rf_suballoc_bit checks in ocfs2_validate_refcount_block().

Joseph Qi (4):
  ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes
  ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read
  ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of xattr and dir index blocks
  ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of extent and refcount blocks

 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c        | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/dir.c          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/inode.c        | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h        | 11 +++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c        | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.3


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  6:32 Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-09-01  6:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes Joseph Qi
2026-09-01  6:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read Joseph Qi
2026-09-01  6:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of xattr and dir index blocks Joseph Qi
2026-09-01  6:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of extent and refcount blocks Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901063301.984933-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®