From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] SUNRPC: Reduce rpciod workqueue contention
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:28:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902-performance-v2-6-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-performance-v2-0-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org>
rpciod drives the RPC client state machine. Under heavy NFS
workloads, multiple CPUs queue RPC task completions concurrently and
contend on the UNBOUND worker pool lock. perf profiles on a 12-core
system show 30-40% of cycles lost to
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath in the rpciod pool at the
WQ_AFFN_CACHE scope (one pool per LLC). The WQ_AFFN_CACHE_SHARD
default helps little here, because its 8-core shards split this
system into just two pools of six cores each.
Set WQ_AFFN_SMT on rpciod so each SMT group gets its own pool and
lock. Most UNBOUND workqueues never contend on the pool lock and
profit from a coarser scope's cache locality. rpciod's sustained
completion traffic makes the lock a first-order bottleneck, so the
override belongs on this workqueue rather than in the system-wide
default. The cost is one pool per SMT group, or per CPU on a system
without SMT, and each pool keeps up to two idle kworkers rather than
culling its last ones.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
net/sunrpc/sched.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
index e81419aa553c..2a1938b9e41e 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
@@ -1268,6 +1268,17 @@ void rpciod_down(void)
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
}
+static void rpc_set_wq_smt_affinity(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = workqueue_set_affn_scope(wq, WQ_AFFN_SMT);
+ if (err)
+ pr_warn("%s: failed to set SMT affinity scope: %d\n",
+ name, err);
+}
+
/*
* Start up the rpciod workqueue.
*/
@@ -1282,6 +1293,7 @@ static int rpciod_start(void)
wq = alloc_workqueue("rpciod", wq_flags, 0);
if (!wq)
goto out_failed;
+ rpc_set_wq_smt_affinity(wq, "rpciod");
rpciod_workqueue = wq;
wq = alloc_workqueue("xprtiod", wq_flags, 0);
if (!wq)
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 19:28 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Reduce lock contention in the NFS client Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] SUNRPC: Use atomic_t for XID allocation Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] SUNRPC: Split recv_lock out of xprt->queue_lock Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] SUNRPC: Set WQ_SYSFS on rpciod and xprtiod Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] NFS: Set WQ_SYSFS on nfsiod Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] workqueue: add workqueue_set_affn_scope() Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:36 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-03 13:41 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] NFS: Reduce nfsiod workqueue contention Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] SUNRPC: Reduce xprtiod " Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902-performance-v2-6-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®