mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,  Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	 open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] NFS: Reduce nfsiod workqueue contention
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:28:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902-performance-v2-7-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-performance-v2-0-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org>

The default affinity scope for unbound workqueues is now
WQ_AFFN_CACHE_SHARD, which splits each LLC into shards of about
eight cores. On a single-socket system whose LLC fits in one
shard, every NFS I/O completion serializes on one nfsiod pool
lock. Profiling 4KB random writes over NFSv3/RDMA with nconnect=3
shows that lock consuming 17% of CPU cycles: 8% dequeuing work and
9% enqueuing follow-on work from rpciod and nfsiod workers.

Set nfsiod's affinity scope to WQ_AFFN_SMT so each SMT group gets
its own pool and queue_work_on() contends only with sibling
threads. Enqueue contention disappears and dequeue contention drops
to 1.4%. Throughput is unchanged because the workload is
transport-limited, but the freed cycles cut submission latency
variance by 67% (slat stdev 31.6 us to 10.5 us), IOPS stdev by
31%, and p99.9 completion latency by 11%.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
 fs/nfs/inode.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index 107a2135029d..21c4560696bd 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -2618,11 +2618,16 @@ static void nfsiod_stop(void)
  */
 static int nfsiod_start(void)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	dprintk("RPC:       creating workqueue nfsiod\n");
 	nfsiod_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("nfsiod",
 				WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_SYSFS, 0);
 	if (nfsiod_workqueue == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	err = workqueue_set_affn_scope(nfsiod_workqueue, WQ_AFFN_SMT);
+	if (err)
+		pr_warn("nfsiod: failed to set SMT affinity scope: %d\n", err);
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_LOCALIO)
 	/*
 	 * localio writes need to use a normal (non-memreclaim) workqueue.

-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 19:28 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Reduce lock contention in the NFS client Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] SUNRPC: Use atomic_t for XID allocation Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] SUNRPC: Split recv_lock out of xprt->queue_lock Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] SUNRPC: Set WQ_SYSFS on rpciod and xprtiod Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] NFS: Set WQ_SYSFS on nfsiod Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] workqueue: add workqueue_set_affn_scope() Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:36   ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-03 13:41     ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] SUNRPC: Reduce rpciod workqueue contention Chuck Lever
2026-09-02 19:28 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-09-02 19:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] SUNRPC: Reduce xprtiod " Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902-performance-v2-7-b71c0c082f9d@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®