* [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr()
@ 2026-08-17 9:24 Mohamad Raizudeen
2026-09-02 17:51 ` Alex Williamson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mohamad Raizudeen @ 2026-08-17 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bhelgaas
Cc: alex, skhan, jkoolstra, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Mohamad Raizudeen
In nvme_disable_and_flr(), the PCI bar is mapped using
NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg) which is (0x14 + 4 = 0x18 bytes)
However, the function later reads the controller status from
NVME_REG_CSTS - offset 0x1C, which is outside the mapped 0x18 byte
boundary and it can cause a page fault or kernel panic on architectures
that enforce strict MMIO boundaries.
Fix this by increasing the mapping size to include NVME_REG_CSTS.
Fixes: ffb0863426eb9 ("PCI: Disable Samsung SM961/PM961 NVMe before FLR")
Signed-off-by: Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index b09f27f7846f..ed03892cc960 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -4090,7 +4090,7 @@ static int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
if (probe)
return 0;
- bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg));
+ bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CSTS + sizeof(cfg));
if (!bar)
return -ENOTTY;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() 2026-08-17 9:24 [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() Mohamad Raizudeen @ 2026-09-02 17:51 ` Alex Williamson 2026-09-03 3:24 ` Mohamad Raizudeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alex Williamson @ 2026-09-02 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mohamad Raizudeen Cc: bhelgaas, skhan, jkoolstra, linux-pci, linux-kernel, alex On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:54:47 +0530 Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > In nvme_disable_and_flr(), the PCI bar is mapped using > NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg) which is (0x14 + 4 = 0x18 bytes) > > However, the function later reads the controller status from > NVME_REG_CSTS - offset 0x1C, which is outside the mapped 0x18 byte > boundary and it can cause a page fault or kernel panic on architectures > that enforce strict MMIO boundaries. What are those architectures? The bug and fix look correct, but the risk seems overstated. Thanks, Alex > Fix this by increasing the mapping size to include NVME_REG_CSTS. > > Fixes: ffb0863426eb9 ("PCI: Disable Samsung SM961/PM961 NVMe before FLR") > Signed-off-by: Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > index b09f27f7846f..ed03892cc960 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > @@ -4090,7 +4090,7 @@ static int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) > if (probe) > return 0; > > - bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg)); > + bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CSTS + sizeof(cfg)); > if (!bar) > return -ENOTTY; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() 2026-09-02 17:51 ` Alex Williamson @ 2026-09-03 3:24 ` Mohamad Raizudeen 2026-09-03 4:21 ` Alex Williamson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mohamad Raizudeen @ 2026-09-03 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Williamson; +Cc: bhelgaas, skhan, jkoolstra, linux-pci, linux-kernel On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 11:51:17AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:54:47 +0530 > Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In nvme_disable_and_flr(), the PCI bar is mapped using > > NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg) which is (0x14 + 4 = 0x18 bytes) > > > > However, the function later reads the controller status from > > NVME_REG_CSTS - offset 0x1C, which is outside the mapped 0x18 byte > > boundary and it can cause a page fault or kernel panic on architectures > > that enforce strict MMIO boundaries. > > What are those architectures? The bug and fix look correct, but the > risk seems overstated. Thanks, > > Alex > Hi Alex, Arm64, risc-v do panic on out-of-bounds mmio. But you are right that the risk is overstated, since most standard servers return all ones instead of crashing. I will send a v2 shortly with a proper commit message focusing on the invalid data. Thanks, Mohamad Raizudeen > > Fix this by increasing the mapping size to include NVME_REG_CSTS. > > > > Fixes: ffb0863426eb9 ("PCI: Disable Samsung SM961/PM961 NVMe before FLR") > > Signed-off-by: Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > index b09f27f7846f..ed03892cc960 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > @@ -4090,7 +4090,7 @@ static int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) > > if (probe) > > return 0; > > > > - bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg)); > > + bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CSTS + sizeof(cfg)); > > if (!bar) > > return -ENOTTY; > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() 2026-09-03 3:24 ` Mohamad Raizudeen @ 2026-09-03 4:21 ` Alex Williamson 2026-09-03 6:07 ` Mohamad Raizudeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alex Williamson @ 2026-09-03 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mohamad Raizudeen Cc: bhelgaas, skhan, jkoolstra, linux-pci, linux-kernel, alex On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:54:56 +0530 Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 11:51:17AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:54:47 +0530 > > Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In nvme_disable_and_flr(), the PCI bar is mapped using > > > NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg) which is (0x14 + 4 = 0x18 bytes) > > > > > > However, the function later reads the controller status from > > > NVME_REG_CSTS - offset 0x1C, which is outside the mapped 0x18 byte > > > boundary and it can cause a page fault or kernel panic on architectures > > > that enforce strict MMIO boundaries. > > > > What are those architectures? The bug and fix look correct, but the > > risk seems overstated. Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > Hi Alex, > > Arm64, risc-v do panic on out-of-bounds mmio. But you are right that the > risk is overstated, since most standard servers return all ones instead > of crashing. Are you building with some sort of sanity or debug checking enabled? While we're clearly violating the API accessing beyond the requested length, it's my understanding that we're generally working with PAGE_SIZE mappings at the MMU, so unless we're crossing a page, the access should work regardless. Even for the cited archs. The -1 return is typically related to how the platform handles master-abort when accessing unimplemented or disabled MMIO space. This out-of-bounds access shouldn't be triggering that, it's still within the enabled BAR range of the device. Anyway, I'd be curious to see the backtrace and whether there's a config option to enable such sanity checking. Thanks, Alex > > > Fix this by increasing the mapping size to include NVME_REG_CSTS. > > > > > > Fixes: ffb0863426eb9 ("PCI: Disable Samsung SM961/PM961 NVMe before FLR") > > > Signed-off-by: Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > index b09f27f7846f..ed03892cc960 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > @@ -4090,7 +4090,7 @@ static int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) > > > if (probe) > > > return 0; > > > > > > - bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg)); > > > + bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CSTS + sizeof(cfg)); > > > if (!bar) > > > return -ENOTTY; > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() 2026-09-03 4:21 ` Alex Williamson @ 2026-09-03 6:07 ` Mohamad Raizudeen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mohamad Raizudeen @ 2026-09-03 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Williamson; +Cc: bhelgaas, skhan, jkoolstra, linux-pci, linux-kernel On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 10:21:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:54:56 +0530 > Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 11:51:17AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:54:47 +0530 > > > Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In nvme_disable_and_flr(), the PCI bar is mapped using > > > > NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg) which is (0x14 + 4 = 0x18 bytes) > > > > > > > > However, the function later reads the controller status from > > > > NVME_REG_CSTS - offset 0x1C, which is outside the mapped 0x18 byte > > > > boundary and it can cause a page fault or kernel panic on architectures > > > > that enforce strict MMIO boundaries. > > > > > > What are those architectures? The bug and fix look correct, but the > > > risk seems overstated. Thanks, > > > > > > Alex > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Arm64, risc-v do panic on out-of-bounds mmio. But you are right that the > > risk is overstated, since most standard servers return all ones instead > > of crashing. > > Are you building with some sort of sanity or debug checking enabled? > > While we're clearly violating the API accessing beyond the requested > length, it's my understanding that we're generally working with > PAGE_SIZE mappings at the MMU, so unless we're crossing a page, the > access should work regardless. Even for the cited archs. > > The -1 return is typically related to how the platform handles > master-abort when accessing unimplemented or disabled MMIO space. This > out-of-bounds access shouldn't be triggering that, it's still within > the enabled BAR range of the device. > > Anyway, I'd be curious to see the backtrace and whether there's a > config option to enable such sanity checking. Thanks, > > Alex > No, I am not runnning with any debug enabled, So I don't have a bactrace. You are completely right about the PAGE_SIZE mappings. I agree that I was mistaken about the panic. Also, I already sent a v2 that drops that speculation and just focuses on the undefined behavior of the out-of-bounds read. Thanks, Mohamad Raizudeen > > > > Fix this by increasing the mapping size to include NVME_REG_CSTS. > > > > > > > > Fixes: ffb0863426eb9 ("PCI: Disable Samsung SM961/PM961 NVMe before FLR") > > > > Signed-off-by: Mohamad Raizudeen <raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > > index b09f27f7846f..ed03892cc960 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > > @@ -4090,7 +4090,7 @@ static int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) > > > > if (probe) > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > - bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CC + sizeof(cfg)); > > > > + bar = pci_iomap(dev, 0, NVME_REG_CSTS + sizeof(cfg)); > > > > if (!bar) > > > > return -ENOTTY; > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-03 6:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-08-17 9:24 [PATCH] PCI: quirks: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO read in nvme_disable_and_flr() Mohamad Raizudeen 2026-09-02 17:51 ` Alex Williamson 2026-09-03 3:24 ` Mohamad Raizudeen 2026-09-03 4:21 ` Alex Williamson 2026-09-03 6:07 ` Mohamad Raizudeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®