mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Fabio Cesari <fabio.cesari@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Brian Masney" <bmasney@redhat.com>,
	"Joshua Crofts" <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: isl29028: fix runtime PM reference leak on error paths
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 03:07:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907030751.3da628d4@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906221517.201877-1-fabio.cesari@gmail.com>

On Mon,  7 Sep 2026 00:15:17 +0200
Fabio Cesari <fabio.cesari@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2026 18:43:58 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Whilst perhaps not best practice as such, it is pretty
> > common to just not bother checking the return of pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
> > at least partly because of that annoying -ENOSYS result if runtime pm isn't
> > enabled.  That is what happens with the ACQUIRE macros for instance.
> >
> > Do we have any particular reason to thing it is more likely to fail i this
> > case than any other?  
> 
> No reason: both functions already returned that value to userspace before the
> patch, and I left that unchanged only because the patch was aimed at the leak.
> It makes sense to fix it as well.
> 
> v2 will take the reference with PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_IF_ENABLED_AUTOSUSPEND() in
> both functions, as Joshua Crofts suggested, so the value goes away along with
> the manual put.

Why the if enabled variant?  I think that only makes sense in places that can
be hit prior to runtime pm being up and running. Maybe that's true here.

> 
> Thanks for the review. v2 follows shortly.
> 
> Fabio


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-06 13:11 Fabio Cesari
2026-09-06 13:55 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-06 22:09   ` Fabio Cesari
2026-09-06 17:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-06 22:15   ` Fabio Cesari
2026-09-07  2:07     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-07  7:29       ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-09 16:21         ` Fabio Cesari
2026-09-06 22:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Fabio Cesari
2026-09-07  7:19   ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-07 11:02     ` Fabio Cesari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260907030751.3da628d4@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fabio.cesari@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®