* [PATCH 01/14] genirq: fix typos in comments
@ 2026-09-07 6:53 Hemanth Selam
2026-09-13 18:11 ` Radu Rendec
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hemanth Selam @ 2026-09-07 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Radu Rendec; +Cc: linux-kernel
Fix typos in comments, reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt. Only touches comments, no code
changes.
Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
---
kernel/irq/msi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index fb5f372215bf..b22d74496af1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int msi_insert_desc(struct device *dev, struct msi_desc *desc,
* insert it at @init_desc->msi_index
*
* @dev: Pointer to the device for which the descriptor is allocated
- * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the desriptor is added
+ * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the descriptor is added
* @init_desc: Pointer to an MSI descriptor to initialize the new descriptor
*
* Return: 0 on success or an appropriate failure code.
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(msi_domain_first_desc);
* @domid: The id of the interrupt domain which should be walked.
* @filter: Descriptor state filter
*
- * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceeded by a
+ * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceded by a
* successful invocation of __msi_first_desc(). Consecutive invocations are
* only valid if the previous one was successful. All these operations have
* to be done within the same MSI mutex held region.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/14] genirq: fix typos in comments
2026-09-07 6:53 [PATCH 01/14] genirq: fix typos in comments Hemanth Selam
@ 2026-09-13 18:11 ` Radu Rendec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Radu Rendec @ 2026-09-13 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hemanth Selam, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 2026-09-07 at 12:23 +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> Fix typos in comments, reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
> misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt. Only touches comments, no code
> changes.
>
> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index fb5f372215bf..b22d74496af1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int msi_insert_desc(struct device *dev, struct msi_desc *desc,
> * insert it at @init_desc->msi_index
> *
> * @dev: Pointer to the device for which the descriptor is allocated
> - * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the desriptor is added
> + * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the descriptor is added
> * @init_desc: Pointer to an MSI descriptor to initialize the new descriptor
> *
> * Return: 0 on success or an appropriate failure code.
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(msi_domain_first_desc);
> * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain which should be walked.
> * @filter: Descriptor state filter
> *
> - * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceeded by a
> + * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceded by a
> * successful invocation of __msi_first_desc(). Consecutive invocations are
> * only valid if the previous one was successful. All these operations have
> * to be done within the same MSI mutex held region.
Thanks for the patch. For your next patch series, please send all the
patches in the series in a single git-send-email command and make sure
email threads are enabled. That way, all the patches in the series will
be grouped, both on lore.kernel.org and in people's mailboxes.
I tried to look up the thread on lore.kernel.org to see if the entire
series consisted solely of typo fixes. I couldn't. But then I
accidentally searched just for "typo" and noticed you had sent many of
these, across multiple subsystems. So I guess I have my answer.
Anyway, the patch itself looks good, so...
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-13 18:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-07 6:53 [PATCH 01/14] genirq: fix typos in comments Hemanth Selam
2026-09-13 18:11 ` Radu Rendec
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®