mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/13] srcutree: Add reader-free fastpath to synchronize_srcu_atomic()
Date: Mon,  7 Sep 2026 15:58:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907075829.2073224-4-kunwu.chan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907075829.2073224-1-kunwu.chan@linux.dev>

From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>

synchronize_srcu_atomic() is restricted to srcu_read_lock_atomic() and
srcu_read_unlock_atomic(), whose read-side critical sections disable
preemption.  In the common case where there are no readers at all, the
grace period therefore need not do the index flip.  Add a fastpath
that sums both ranks of the per-CPU ->srcu_ctrs[] counters and, if the
lock counts match the unlock counts on both ranks, ends the grace
period immediately, skipping the srcu_advance_state() scans, mirroring
the similar Tiny SRCU fastpath.

Correctness requires the counter-sum proof to follow the grace-period
anchor written by srcu_gp_start(); placing it before the anchor could
let this grace period miss a pre-existing reader and return without
waiting for it.  The smp_mb() between the unlock and lock sums pairs
with the smp_mb() in __srcu_read_lock().  The grace period is ended
manually under ->lock and ->srcu_atomic_gp_flag.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 7dd705eec573..533607de5728 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -2113,6 +2113,8 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
 	unsigned long srcu_state;
 	struct srcu_usage *sup = ssp->srcu_sup;
+	unsigned long rdm0, rdm1;
+	unsigned long unlocks0, unlocks1;
 
 	// Initialize.	Either init_srcu_struct() was invoked or
 	// DEFINE_SRCU() or similar was used.  Therefore, no allocation
@@ -2149,6 +2151,52 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	srcu_gp_start(ssp);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sup);
 
+	//
+	// Fastpath:  If there are no readers at all, neither grace-period
+	// scan need wait, so both can be satisfied at once without doing
+	// the index flip.  The counter-sum proof is the same as that of
+	// srcu_readers_active_idx_check(), but spanning both indices.
+	// Atomic SRCU guarantees that all readers are of
+	// SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC, so the SLOWGP check never triggers and
+	// the ->srcu_reader_flavor masks returned by
+	// srcu_readers_unlock_idx() are unused.
+	//
+	// This proof must follow the grace-period anchor written by the
+	// srcu_gp_start() above, never precede it.  With the anchor first,
+	// a reader whose lock increment is missed by the sums below cannot
+	// have incremented its lock counter before the anchor, and therefore
+	// cannot be a pre-existing reader of this grace period.  Placing the
+	// proof before the anchor would let this grace period miss a
+	// pre-existing reader and return without waiting for it.
+	//
+	// The smp_mb() pairs with the smp_mb() in __srcu_read_lock()
+	// (store-buffering pattern), which guarantees that a lock is always
+	// counted if the corresponding unlock is counted, the same
+	// memory-ordering guarantee as is provided by
+	// srcu_readers_active_idx_check().
+	//
+	unlocks0 = srcu_readers_unlock_idx(ssp, 0, &rdm0);
+	unlocks1 = srcu_readers_unlock_idx(ssp, 1, &rdm1);
+	smp_mb(); /* A */
+	if (srcu_readers_lock_idx(ssp, 0, false, unlocks0) &&
+	    srcu_readers_lock_idx(ssp, 1, false, unlocks1)) {
+		// No readers, so end this grace period manually, skipping
+		// the index flip.  Advancing the sequence number via
+		// rcu_seq_start() in srcu_gp_start() above and rcu_seq_end()
+		// below keeps get_state_synchronize_srcu() and
+		// poll_state_synchronize_srcu() working, all under ->lock
+		// and ->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, which excludes concurrent
+		// sequence-number updates.
+		raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(sup);
+		rcu_seq_end(&sup->srcu_gp_seq);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sup);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp, srcu_state));
+		atomic_set_release(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 0);
+		preempt_enable();
+		non_block_end();
+		return;
+	}
+
 	// Wait for it to complete, helping it along.
 	while (!poll_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp, srcu_state)) {
 		cpu_relax();
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  7:58 [PATCH 00/13] srcu: Round out atomic SRCU support Kunwu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 01/13] litmus: Add SRCU fastpath anchor-before-scan test Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-09  3:02     ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 02/13] litmus: Add SRCU fastpath scan-before-anchor test Kunwu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-09-08 20:29   ` [PATCH 03/13] srcutree: Add reader-free fastpath to synchronize_srcu_atomic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-08 21:13     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-08 21:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-08 22:09         ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-08 22:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-08 22:26     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-08 22:53       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-08 22:56         ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-08 23:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-09  3:35       ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 04/13] rcutorture: Add atomic-SRCU support to torture.sh Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:34   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-09 22:35     ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10  1:30       ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-10  3:47         ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10  4:31           ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 05/13] srcutree: Honor is_atomic in check_init_srcu_struct() Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 20:27   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 06/13] srcutree: Make init_srcu_struct_atomic() prevent transition to big Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:36   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-09  2:34     ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-10  0:08       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 07/13] srcutree: Don't transition atomic SRCU to big in srcu_gp_end() Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-09  2:45     ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-10  0:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10  3:18         ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-10  3:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10  4:27             ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 08/13] srcutree: Forbid srcu_expedite_current() on atomic SRCU Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:43   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 09/13] rcutorture: Disable srcu_expedite_current() for " Kunwu Chan
2026-09-08 23:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 10/13] srcutree: Skip callback scheduling for atomic SRCU grace periods Kunwu Chan
2026-09-09  0:01   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 11/13] srcutree: Remove srcu_barrier() sleep for atomic SRCU Kunwu Chan
2026-09-09  0:05   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 12/13] srcutree: Remove debug pr_alert()s Kunwu Chan
2026-09-09  0:06   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-07  7:58 ` [PATCH 13/13] srcu: Restrict atomic-SRCU non_block annotation to task context Kunwu Chan
2026-09-09  0:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-10 12:16 ` [PATCH 00/13] srcu: Round out atomic SRCU support Zqiang
2026-09-11  2:31   ` KunWu Chan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260907075829.2073224-4-kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
    --to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®